Holocaust imposter, Joseph Hirt, lied about Auschwitz imprisonment and escape, historian says

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
User avatar
Sannhet
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 274
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 6:12 pm
Location: USA

Re: Holocaust imposter, Joseph Hirt, lied about Auschwitz imprisonment and escape, historian says

Postby Sannhet » 1 week 5 days ago (Mon Aug 07, 2017 12:31 pm)

On the Jesse Owens and Black aspect to Holocaustism (as Hirt equated them.)

When I think of it, I do notice that Blacks do not figure much in the standard Nazi persecution and broadly-defined Holocaust narrative(s); at most, very far at the margins. One claim I have rarely come across is that the Germans exterminated thousands of captured French black-colonial troops in 1940, a claim that is unverified as usual.

The most obvious reason why stories of Black mistreatment, which may be just as valid as stories of Jewish mistreatment, may be that when the earliest proto-Holocaust stories were coalescing, Blacks were, in many ways, second-class citizens in the USA and essentially not present at all in any other Western society. (I note that the U.S. Holocaust Museum relegates Blacks to second-class victimhood, as follows, on its "Blacks During the Holocaust" page: "The fate of black people from 1933 to 1945 in Nazi Germany and in German-occupied territories ranged from isolation to persecution, sterilization, medical experimentation, incarceration, brutality, and murder. However, there was no systematic program for their elimination as there was for Jews and other groups.")

__________________________________
Here is an interesting snapshot of Black attitudes in the very beginning of U.S. involvement in the war:

Poll of Blacks in Harlem, NY, early 1942 [this poll is often cited; I cannot find an original for this online,
but it is quoted in the Washington Post, Oct 11, 1987]

(Asked whether Blacks in America would be better off, worse off, or the same in the event of Japanese victory.)
28% Worse off
18% Better off
49% Same as now
5% No Opinion

Asked the same question about a possible German victory, 67% replied "Worse off." That leaves, of course, a substantial 33% saying "Same," "No Opinion," or (very few) "Better."

And this:

The editor of the Pittsburgh Courier proclaimed that Negroes had their
"own war" at home "against oppression and exploitation from without and
against disorganization and lack of confidence within" [Sept. 9, 1939]; and the Chicago
Defender
thought that "peace at home" should be the main concern of
black Americans [May 25, 1940].

Many Negroes agreed with columnist Schuyler that "Our war is not
against Hitler in Europe, but against the Hitlers in America" [Dec. 21, 1940]. The isolationist
view of the war in Europe and the antagonism toward Great Britain
led to an attitude that was rather neutral toward the Nazis and the Japanese,
or, in some extreme cases, pro-Axis. Appealing to this latent feeling,
isolationist periodicals tried to gain Negro support in their struggle against
American entrance into the war
.23 By 1940 there were also Negro cults
such as the Ethiopian Pacific Movement, the World Wide Friends of Africa,
the Brotherhood of Liberty for the Black People of America, and
many others, which preached unity among the world's darker people, including
Japanese. Many of these groups exploited the latent anti-semitism
common among Negroes in the urban ghettos by claiming that the racial
policies of Germany were correct.24
From "The 'Forgotten Years' of the Negro Revolution" by Richard M. Dalfiume in The Journal of American History, Vol. 55, No. 1 (Jun., 1968), pp. 90-106.Link to PDF.



User avatar
Hektor
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2731
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 7:59 am

Re: Holocaust imposter, Joseph Hirt, lied about Auschwitz imprisonment and escape, historian says

Postby Hektor » 1 week 5 days ago (Mon Aug 07, 2017 12:57 pm)

Hannover wrote:Jews like liar Joseph Hirt try to lure in supporters for their impossible 'holocaust' scam.
Setting up blacks with lies about Jesse Owens is a classic example.
Also recall the contrived and now thoroughly debunked lies about homosexuals & gypsies.
...


Contriving together a real Clinton Coalition including anyone except self-reliant, heterosexual, White, Males.

It seems they mostly filtered out the more absurd Holocaust stories from their narrative, but from time to time some fairy tale persists.

User avatar
Sannhet
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 274
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 6:12 pm
Location: USA

Re: Holocaust imposter, Joseph Hirt, lied about Auschwitz imprisonment and escape, historian says

Postby Sannhet » 1 week 4 days ago (Tue Aug 08, 2017 10:15 am)

Hektor wrote:It seems they mostly filtered out the more absurd Holocaust stories from their narrative, but from time to time some fairy tale persists.

A Google News search for 'Jesse Owens' reveals many recent news stories (about something that happened over 80 years ago), most of which imply the 'Hitler Snub' story. The anniversary of the gold medal event was this past week. Still, there is no reason full articles should be written about some gold medal race 81 years ago -- unless it supports the all-important Holocaust Narrative!

Here is a late July 2017 Washington Post obituary on a recently-deceased Jewish-German would-be Olympian allegedly barred from the 1936 Olympics on racial grounds: "Margaret Bergmann Lambert, Jewish high jumper barred from the Berlin Olympics, dies at 103." (Note that there is no reason the prestige Washington Post should publish a major obituary for such a frankly minor figure, again except insofar as it props up the all-important 'Big H.') This obituary includes the following words: "the African American athlete Jesse Owens further humiliated Aryan supremacists by capturing four gold medals for the United States." Two sentences later, the word 'Holocaust' appears!

_____________________________________

A Google News search for 'Jewish lampshades' reveals an article last week in the prestigious (the number one top-selling) Australian newspaper making some bold claims, mostly not supported even in the orthodox Holocaust story:

"Israel Losing the Public Relations War Against Palestinians" by Caroline Overington / July 31, 2017 / Link

[....] The creation of Israel, two years after the Holocaust, was reason to feel hopeful about humanity.

A panel of global leaders, in the form of UN representatives, had taken a look at what happened to the Jewish people — how they had been driven from their homes and murdered in the streets; how they had been skinned, so their hides could be turned into lampshades and soap; how their infant children had been taken by the ankles and belted against brick walls; how they had been used for medical experiments, or taken by cattle train to extermination camps, where they were gassed, before their naked bodies were bulldozed into pits — and they had voted to create a permanent home for that most forsaken of people, the Jewish people, in Israel.

The idea was always for Jews to share the Holy Land with the Palestinians.

Israel accepted those terms in 1947.

The Palestinians did not.


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Kingfisher and 7 guests