typical Nizkor phoney 'holocaust' photo

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
avatar
Vallon
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 292
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 3:55 pm

Postby Vallon » 1 decade 1 year ago (Wed Jul 27, 2005 3:54 pm)

Turpitz wrote:I bet no revisionists has ever been allowed access to the negatives, all the grand titles and labels you attach to things to add an air of validity, but it's all wind and piss at the end of the day.
The negatives are supposed to be lost. There seem to be two sets of original contact prints.

The story on the camera is changing, it seems.
A photoenthusiast cut and glued and pasted, and concludes that the negatives had a square format:
Image



avatar
Richard Perle
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 647
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 9:45 am

Postby Richard Perle » 1 decade 1 year ago (Wed Jul 27, 2005 4:31 pm)

The story on the camera is changing, it seems.
A photoenthusiast cut and glued and pasted, and concludes that the negatives had a square format:


Changed from what to what? Does the square format conclusion contradict something?

User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 8985
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Postby Hannover » 1 decade 1 year ago (Wed Jul 27, 2005 4:38 pm)

Interesting that the first two photos show no 'window frame' like the last two. In fact they show no relationship to the last two whatsoever. They appear to be an attempt at creating a dramatic, secretive, in-a-hurry appearance.

And, the very first photo appears to have been taken directly below a tree. Not possible if we accept the 'inside a building, through a window' presentation of the last two.

Ofcourse, this is all rather moot in lieu of the spaghetti legs of the 'corpses' that show up clearly when enlarged.

A complete fraud.

- Hannover
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

avatar
Vallon
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 292
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 3:55 pm

Postby Vallon » 1 decade 1 year ago (Wed Jul 27, 2005 4:59 pm)

Richard Perle wrote:
The story on the camera is changing, it seems.
A photoenthusiast cut and glued and pasted, and concludes that the negatives had a square format:


Changed from what to what? Does the square format conclusion contradict something?
Pressac wrote that he published the complete photographs, not just the "interesting part":
http://www.mazal.org/Pressac/Page%20Scans/Page422.htm

User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 8985
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Postby Hannover » 1 decade 1 year ago (Wed Jul 27, 2005 9:01 pm)

Vallon:

- Why are there no physical remains?
- Where are the necessary ashes?
- Where are the bones?
- The standard storyline says that human fat was scooped upon the corpses for fuel. Do you believe that?
- Where are the indications of pits of the size that are alleged?
- Why hasn't the 'holocau$t' Industry authorized verifiable excavations of the alleged sites?

Hannover
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

avatar
code yellow
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 210
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2003 8:07 am

Postby code yellow » 1 decade 1 year ago (Wed Jul 27, 2005 9:21 pm)

:) According to Udo Walendy, if you look at the very first photo in this thread, the bodies and other manipulations are drawn, like a sketch, then a photo is taken which gives the images in the photo a more realistic looking affect. I have not seen a close up version of this photo yet, which would probably give the hoax away. Why is the picture being taken from such a distance?

avatar
Goethe
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 360
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2003 3:41 am

Postby Goethe » 1 decade 1 year ago (Wed Jul 27, 2005 10:06 pm)

I have not seen a close up version of this photo yet, which would probably give the hoax away. Why is the picture being taken from such a distance?

The photo was not taken, it was made.

Here's a close-up, a dead give away for sure:
Image

avatar
Turpitz
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 966
Joined: Sun May 11, 2003 12:57 pm

Postby Turpitz » 1 decade 1 year ago (Thu Jul 28, 2005 1:51 am)

The negatives are supposed to be lost.


I could have told you it would come to this obvious conclusion in the first line of the first page of the thread.

A photoenthusiast cut and glued and pasted, and concludes that the negatives had a square format:


And how could anyone believe they are forgeries after seeing that?

User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 8985
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Postby Hannover » 1 decade 1 year ago (Thu Jul 28, 2005 2:02 am)

Notice how these are called 'negatives'; they aren't negatives:

http://w3.msi.vxu.se/users/pku/Historia ... PolResist_ negstrip.png

Image
And there's the silly color added in order to give it an aura of credibility.

Revisionists have the 'holocau$t' scam by the throat and aren't letting go.

- Hannover
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

avatar
Vallon
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 292
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 3:55 pm

Postby Vallon » 1 decade 1 year ago (Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:20 am)

I agree with Moderator #3 that the discussion is better continued in this thread.

On the Auschwitz-museum site I found a version of the photograph with the pile of bodies with good contrast:
Image
http://www.auschwitz-muzeum.oswiecim.pl ... lanie.html

The spaghetti-photo seems retouched, to make some features in the photograph into the body of a women, with legs, knees, a breast, a face, and hair. Little of that can be discerned in the original. According to Walendy, this picture comes from Schoenberner, "The Yellow Star".

Schoenberner's book has been analyzed and critized in Cornelia Brink's Ikonen der Vernichting. I do not know if this picture was discussed, or if Walendy was given credit there. I can try to borrow the book.

User avatar
Scott
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 306
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2002 7:00 am

Postby Scott » 1 decade 1 year ago (Sun Sep 25, 2005 11:57 am)

In the above photo posted by Vallon the retouching makes it appear that the guy to the left in the group at the right is carrying a gasmask in his right hand. If so it is a mask huge enough for a horse!

:D

avatar
Bergmann
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 382
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 4:29 pm

Postby Bergmann » 1 decade 1 year ago (Mon Sep 26, 2005 10:57 am)

Burning human fat produces black smoke, similar to burning oil (Remember the burning oil fields in Kuweit). Ask any fire fighter.

What comes geyser like out of the earth in above pictures looks to me more like condensed water steam.
:D

User avatar
Hektor
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2644
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 7:59 am

Postby Hektor » 1 decade 7 months ago (Sun Oct 01, 2006 8:21 pm)

Bergmann wrote:Burning human fat produces black smoke, similar to burning oil (Remember the burning oil fields in Kuweit). Ask any fire fighter.

What comes geyser like out of the earth in above pictures looks to me more like condensed water steam.
:D
Are you sure about this(black smoke)? Do you have references for this? Is the smoke not supposed to come from the fuel/wood/coal used for making the fire?

User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 8985
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Re: typical Nizkor phoney 'holocaust' photo

Postby Hannover » 6 years 8 months ago (Thu Sep 16, 2010 8:03 pm)

Yet, forum participants such as 'Hans' claims these fakes are proof of the 'holocaust' storyline. See his recent post here:
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=6160&p=43513

This is too easy.

- Hannover
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

avatar
JustTheTruth
Member
Member
Posts: 32
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 2:53 pm

Re: typical Nizkor phoney 'holocaust' photo

Postby JustTheTruth » 6 years 7 months ago (Wed Oct 06, 2010 12:58 pm)

What about the super-long body lying right at the front-center?

They sure are some LONG legs....


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Yahoo [Bot] and 4 guests