I know this report prepared for Irving/Lipstadt trial
But I came across another report which you can find here
This report looks mostly like a response to this critique from Germar Rudolf
I was quite shocked by this report, aside the usual attacks on G. Rudolf or on revisionists, aside all the usual lies about revisionists, I was shocked by the rest of the report which is consited from absurd claims or from long refuted claims, here are some examples: (emphasies added)
About relocation of stairs needed for better access to crematoria because of morgues which prostruded above ground
Which brings us to the question if the location of crematoria 2 and 3 in Birkenau would have made it necessary to relocate the entrance. While the use of semi-basements for the morgue did provide some difficulties for vehicles seeking access from the side of the station, it did not cause more than a detour of a little over 120 meters (morgue 2, which caused the obstruction, jutted 49 meters west from the footprint of the main building, and it was some 9 meters wide)
About inventory document regarding the morgues and about wire mesh columns.
in a second inventory attached as an appendix for that same morgue 1 four Drahtnetzeinschiebvorrichtung(en) or wire mesh introduction devices, and four Holzblenden or wooden covers.[..]the four wire mesh introduction devices with their wooden covers mentioned in the inventory of March 31, 1943.
I do not know what possible "ordinary mortuary use" these wire mesh introduction devices could have served, and Rudolf ignores them. It seems, however, very likely that these Drahtnetzeinschiebvorrichtungen are identical to the four wire mesh gas columns which Henryk Tauber and Michael Kula described in detail in their 1945 affidavits
About evidence for air-raid shelter use in crematoria
And, once again, there is not a single document that directly refers to such a use of those spaces as air raid shelters, and neither is there a single piece of eyewitness evidence.
About spy-hole in gas-tight door
also letter of March 31, 1943 with its reference to a Gastür - yet one would wonder why this door would need a spy-hole of double 8mm glass.
About Zyklon B introduction holes
But all of this is probably no longer of importance because the holes in the roof of the gas chamber of crematorium 2 have been found. Attached to this report is a paper on the holes of crematorium 2. Entitled "A Report on Some Findings Concerning the Gas Chamber of Krematorium II in Auschwitz-Birkenau," it written by Daniel Keren, Ph.D., Jamie McCarthy, and Harry Mazal OBE.
According to eyewitness evidence which seems confirmed by aerial photos taken in 1944, these four gas columns were connected to four openings in the roof of the gas chamber, and were with removable covers - the four Holzblenden listed in the inventory.
About Nazi code language
He also suggests that the designation "SB," commonly known to refer to Sonderbehandlung or "special treatment," which also means killing during the war, in fact refers to some infirmary.
About what happened to inmates who had died of "natural" causes. (really extraordinary explanation and true gem)
Which brings us to the question if, after their conversion to killing centers, crematoria 2 and 3 were meant to store the bodies of those who had died of "natural" causes, which according to Rudolf "amounted to thousands of bodies." (p. 17). Rudolf does not provide any evidence that this indeed happened, and I do not know of any evidence that corpses of people who had died in the camp were stored in these crematoria. In fact, given the great incineration capacity of these buildings, and crematoria 4 and 5, there was no need for morgues. Even if the camp would have achieved its intended population of 140,000, and even if there would have been a repetition of the 1% daily mortality that occurred during the typhus epidemic of August 1942, the combined incineration capacity of crematoria 2-5 of over 4,000 corpses per day would have more than sufficient to take care of the corpses.
These are only a few examples. Did anybody here see this shocking piece of text before? I really wonder, is this man serious? Why he do this, why he lies so obviously? Why he makes such an absurd claims and why he lied so many times when his lies could be easily exposed with documents which he verbally falsified in his report to support his agenda? Why he lie when his lies could be easily exposed by his witness testimonies which is the most imporatant evidence for Pelt? Why he lies when his lies could be easily exposed by material evidence? Why he lies about missing evidence in cases mentioned above when he as an "expert" must know very well that evidence is not missing? And finally, why he lies that Rudolf ignore some evidence when Rudolf clearly adressed this evidence in article which is quoted by Pelt (and even in previous articles dated to 90´s) and Pelt has no problem to present refuted evidence again?
I don´t assume that he don´t have the knowledge, he must know all these basic facts as an "expert", so I really wonder why he do this, he must know that what he claims is not true, but he has no problem to lie, I can´t understand how is this possible for normal human being. He just expect that most of the readers are uneducated or that they will don´t waste time to verify his claims and the negligible part consited from educated peoples are too small to be worry about false claims and lies? I really wonder.