The Importance of the Eichmann Trial According to Jewish Professor of history, Peter Novick, The Eichmann trial was the "catalyst" of the Holocaust lie. From his book "The Holocaust in American Life" (pp.128 and 144) : "Would those things by themselves have been the catalyst...

This is very interesting. The two scripts surely look very different, but it's difficult to compare here. I don't know how to do this but maybe you could take out a small part of each text and place them next to each other. Or maybe one of the moderators could do it, and post it in the Eichmann tria...

For some reason the link did work on my computer, but otherwise you could just try this: http://www.yadvashem.org/wps/portal/IY_HON_Welcome and search for Richard Klement. The two Richard Klements are both born 15/04/1898 in Czechoslovakia and would be the same person. In the Auschwitz version the m...

From where do those writings of his during the war come, is it from among those writings which were handed over to David Irving as I remember it about ten years ago from a friend of the Klement family? Looking at the Yad Vashem records, there are two Richard Klement claimed to have died during the w...

Summing up the main points of the case: 1. The Holocaust story telling Pseudo Eichmann begins with the statement: "I think this is one of the greatest crimes in history". He keeps on playing the reversed role of a holocaust witness, again and again postulating that the story is true and th...

Comparing with the videos this actually could be the photo of the same man, which would mean that the identity of pseudo-Eichmann would allready be found. Shaving of the bird, putting on some other glasses, becomig thinner and ten years older and making some strange facial expressions this could ver...

It appears to be a picture of man number 3. Neither Eichmann nor the (pseudo) Eichmann in the glass case at the trial.

Well, the investigation shouldn't be about if or not some Jew under the name of Ricardo Eichmann is walking around in Berlin claiming to be the son of Eichmann and bad-mouthing him, because that would be difficult to prove with certainty. However, with the evidence brought forward about the trial, i...

Bradley,

Hannover loves you, but Goethe and Mads are bringing up some questions. Take the film to the market, create a bigger market afterwards. There has been a good preview at a major film festival. The market is there now.

Mads, I don't think it would be the end of "holocaust", but it probably could go a long way in creating an understanding for all those hoaxes which the Jews have later made, those small games and actors, and that, of course, could be the beginning of something very important, given that su...

Bradley Smith,
when you wrote "on the other side there is only empty space", did you mean it that way, to which Haldan apparently alludes, that the zionists will slaughter off the revisionists like pets as in a kind of horror movie?

Speaking in a "robotic-monotonic kind of way" as well as saying openly that one has been tortured are some very strong signs of having been tortured. Now, (pseudo) Eichmann does, in fact, not only openly cooperate with the Israelis in court, he seems balanced emotionally and only becomes d...

Of course Eichmann would have said that he had killed millions of people? With torture, and there isn't the least sign of it.

The eyewitnesses used to all have their own story (and as far as I know they still do). Apart from being meaningless, (pseudo) Eichmanns stories show how much he was a holocaust witness, but the set-up was different than the usual, with the holocaust witness playing the nazi, who admits it all.

I think those testimonies you refer to were made with the intention of prooving the holocaust story, as for example when he talks about an "geyser of blood". Of course these stories are incoherent just like the holocaust story itself. Do you think Eichmann would have said such things? No, ...