Was there any retaliation against Rassinier for his revisionist publications? Or were there no laws in the late 1940s, the 1950s and the 1960s that prohibit questioning and/or debunking the "Holocaust"? There was no law against revisionism ( négationnisme ) in France until the loi Gayssot...

He says he is the only member of his family who takes his view of what happened. He says that it makes no sense and he doesn't understand it.. I seem to remember a daughter was in the papers a few years ago.

Over the past few days, various large YouTube accounts and subreddits have been banned, ostensibly for "Hate speech." [.....] On YouTube they banned David Duke, American Renaissance, and even Stefan Molyneux . Molyneux had over 1 million subscribers and claimed to have the "Largest p...

... Those two protocols about evidence and fact being taken for granted. Was it 19 and 20. Someone help me out here. Sure, It's IMT Charter Articles 19 and 21: Article 19. The Tribunal shall not be bound by technical rules of evidence. It shall adopt and apply to the greatest possible extent expedi...

I'm sorry to say that revisionist supporter and Seattle artist Charles Krafft has died:
http://www.charleskrafft.com/obituary/

Thanks. The review says: Beyond the perpetrators, only prisoner survivors could bear witness to the unspeakable crimes of Aktion 1005. Accordingly, the Nazis planned to murder every prisoner involved. Once assigned to Aktion 1005, Jewish or other prisoners were often chained together by foot manacle...

I'm afraid that we seemed to lack energy to engage much with Mattogno's book on the Einsatzgruppen. Since then, a tangentially relevant books has appeared, presumably from the exterminationist perspective: “Aktion 1005”—Spurenbeseitigung von NS-Massenverbrechen 1942–1945: Eine “geheime Reichssache” ...

This recent book looks like worth reviewing from a revisionist perspective: “Aktion 1005”—Spurenbeseitigung von NS-Massenverbrechen 1942–1945: Eine “geheime Reichssache” im Spannungsfeld von Kriegswende und Propaganda: Spurenbeseitigung von NS-Massenverbrechen 1942–1945: Eine “geheime Reichssache” i...

Your first option seems closer to the truth. However, the Allies were amongst the principal purveyors of the myth, though individual Jews were involved, e,g, at Nuremberg. The Eichmann trial, in the wake of Raul Hilberg's myth-making Destruction of the European Jews , gave the story new legs and inc...

I am not sure about the extent of Allied press reports of atrocities during the war and the German response. The German leaders would almost certainly have expected a barrage of atrocity propaganda, as happened in WW1. Deborah Lipstadt's Beyond Belief (1986) deals with the American wartime press. It...

Eric Hunt's videos were removed from HolocaustHandbooks because he complained about them after he was arrested for supposedly assaulting Wiesel (tugging on his shirt, really). So yes, those are removed from CODOH main site and HolocaustHandbooks.. They were removed long after that, when Eric Hunt c...

This is certainly part of the story. At the moment in the Anglosphere though, we are hearing much more about Atlantic slavery and the British Empire.

That is a fascinating book from 1943, Hektor. It's interesting that it talks about "biologisch zu vernichten", suggesting that the term needed to be qualified to mean kill. It sounds like there was atrocity propaganda on both sides.

Do you know of any similar books?

Deborah Lipstadt supports some key aspects of free speech. She opposes criminalization of revisionism for example and has said so publicly. We should give her credit for that. Not everyone does it.

My one paragraph would be that the holocaust increasingly comes up as a touchstone in dealing with other subjects and doesn't deserve the credit it gets. It affects our view of human nature - psychology, history, poetry, even music, according to Adorno. Our culture should not be led astray by a few ...