Pizzaman/Wroclaw/Andy: Your filthy and desperate language response makes you just another run-of-the-mill, typical representative for a storyline you obviously cannot defend. Those with truth on their side do not engage is such infantile displays and threats BTW, everything you have said, in posts a...

Pizzaman, Among your assorted allegations about the participants at this forum, you repeatedly ask why some of your posts are not approved. It's because they usually are not related to the thread in which they occur, or even the subject of the forum, and you simply repeat your previous statements, w...

A number of participants stated that this thread was off topic, we should have heeded their notifications and pulled the thread. This topic was tolerated in the hopes that it would generate some discussion related to the 'holocaust' story. It has not, the result being statements by both side which a...

The questionnaire and "transit" are separate topics. He posts his list of transitees to thumb his nose that he has dodged my position on the five criteria necessary to prove transit as a policy. Once again: Entirely unfair and severely loaded. Not at all, Mr Pizzaman. Hannover's initial p...

Pizzaman, you listed SEVEN separate questions in one thread that you want Revisionists to answer without giving any background on them or even stating your position on each of them. That's a non-starter. The guidelines say specifically, one topic per post. Please start threads on each or post to exi...

Pizzaman wrote:This is absurd. Why is Hannover allowed to constantly go off topic and change the subject?

Where has Hannover gone off topic? He started the thread on the questionnaire under discussion. HIs replies all relate to the quesionnaire.

Pizzaman, you've already made this 'challenge' in another thread. Enough is enough.

Again, what I'd said was that the Hydrokop firm identified bones and hair at several dozen locations in Auschwitz. I didn't just refer to the report; I said something about what they found. And I also said that Udo Walendy published parts for it. I have a PDF. Show us the full Hydrokop report, don'...

Sorry, Raymond one topic at time. What camp is it going to be?
Read the guidelines.
http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=358

Keep your posts limited to one point.

We have decided that there was so much spam by so many: off topic posts, subject changing, use of strawmen arguments, intentional disinformation, intentional disruption, name calling, and duplicity by those who oppose freedom of speech and freedom of research, that is was necessary to get back to th...

Several posts of mine have been deleted, most importantly both mine and Kageki's posts about the Hydrokop report. You essentially posted; 'There is the Hydrokop report', without commenting about it, or even producing it. Not what would be considered open debate, which is what this Forum emphasizes....

SSeth: I slightly edited your last post because of the unacceptable language that was directed at an active participant of this forum. The post did raise some good points for readers to see, hence it was not deleted straight away. However, future posts containing such language directed at an active ...

I've sent your message to our webmaster. BTW, we have a private message function (PM), but it is to be earned (once it's determined that the registrant is not a spammer), it is not automatic upon registration. There has been abuse of it by those who wish to stifle free speech. Welcome to The CODOH R...

Hans, You have not provided information which you were challenged to give. IOW, you are dodging. And what "testimonies" are you supposedly referring to? Where were these so called "testimonies" submitted? In courts of law? If so, show us the complete transcripts with verbatim cro...

Hans:
Your response, which was simply 'so & so said so', will not cut it here. Tell us what they supposedly said in regards to the leichenkeller inventory list.