Search found 22 matches

by tomtruthteller
Fri Jan 18, 2013 5:38 pm
Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
Topic: An official revision of Majdanek ?
Replies: 57
Views: 10694

Re: An official revision of Majdanek ?

Revisio: tomtruthteller, I think it is a misunderstanding. When you said "gas chambers", Bob didn't understand that you meant "some gas chambers", he believed that you meant "all gas chambers". No place for big words like "illogical" or "dishonest". ...
by tomtruthteller
Fri Jan 18, 2013 12:47 pm
Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
Topic: An official revision of Majdanek ?
Replies: 57
Views: 10694

Re: An official revision of Majdanek ?

Bob makes this statement: 5 [alleged homicidal gas] chambers were dropped/abandoned Yet Bob's answer to this question: Is it - True. - or - False. - that: The Majdanek museum has admitted that places in the camp, which were formerly alleged to be “homicidal gas chambers,” were in fact never used to ...
by tomtruthteller
Fri Jan 18, 2013 10:15 am
Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
Topic: An official revision of Majdanek ?
Replies: 57
Views: 10694

Re: An official revision of Majdanek ?

Thanks Bob. So just to clarify, would you please answer the question just as it is asked:

Is it - True. - or - False. - that: The Majdanek museum has admitted that places in the camp, which were formerly alleged to be “homicidal gas chambers,” were in fact never used to gas human beings?
by tomtruthteller
Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:56 am
Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
Topic: An official revision of Majdanek ?
Replies: 57
Views: 10694

Re: An official revision of Majdanek ?

Thanks Bob. But the question in question made no distinction between an explicit or tacit admission. A tacit admission is still an admission. Besides, even the plain old definition of just "admission" proves that the museum "has admitted that places in the camp, which were formerly al...
by tomtruthteller
Thu Jan 17, 2013 7:37 pm
Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
Topic: An official revision of Majdanek ?
Replies: 57
Views: 10694

Re: An official revision of Majdanek ?

Bob: Answer is "no" or as you said - "false", there are still two rooms alleged to be homicidal gas chambers as far as I know, i.e. rooms A (III) and B1 (I). Thanks bob, but just because "there are still two rooms alleged to be homicidal gas chambers," doesn't mean that...
by tomtruthteller
Thu Jan 17, 2013 6:44 pm
Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
Topic: An official revision of Majdanek ?
Replies: 57
Views: 10694

Re: An official revision of Majdanek ?

Bob: I cannot give you an universal answer, for example I must say "True" for room II/BII, admitted to be not used.[1]. But I must say "No" or "False" for the others since I am not aware of any official statement which says something like what I see in your question, th...
by tomtruthteller
Thu Jan 17, 2013 6:24 pm
Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
Topic: Holocaust denial and sexual abuse of children
Replies: 20
Views: 4775

Re: Holocaust denial and sexual abuse of children

The crux of this Jewish woman's argument* seems to be: Tangible evidence for sexual abuse is usually scant, often it's just the say-so of the victim once they reach adulthood, and tangible evidence for the Big H is scant, it's mostly survivor testimony. Therefore the Holocaust and sexual abuse of c...
by tomtruthteller
Thu Jan 17, 2013 2:29 pm
Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
Topic: An official revision of Majdanek ?
Replies: 57
Views: 10694

Re: An official revision of Majdanek ?

Thanks for your input Bob. (Though I did post that same map, in English, earlier.) You seem quite knowledgable about Majdanek, so I would like you to confirm something for me if you would. Bob: They dropped five homicidal gas chambers so far, but everything else is true! So the answer to this questi...
by tomtruthteller
Tue Jan 08, 2013 9:21 pm
Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
Topic: An official revision of Majdanek ?
Replies: 57
Views: 10694

Re: An official revision of Majdanek ?

FYI - I was examining the figures concerning the incredible reduction in Majdanek's death toll claims over the years and thought I would compare the number claimed by the museum's director in 1944 with the number claimed by Graf and Matoggno in 2005. G & M's findings reduce the original claim by...
by tomtruthteller
Mon Jan 07, 2013 11:01 am
Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
Topic: An official revision of Majdanek ?
Replies: 57
Views: 10694

Re: An official revision of Majdanek ?

While searching for answers, I found the following on the rodoh forum site that I think is very apropo: Majdanek’s Shrinking Death Toll A microcosm of the fraudulently alleged - “jewish holocaust of WW II” According to orthodox historians, during WW II the Germans allegedly set up six so-called “ext...
by tomtruthteller
Sat Jan 05, 2013 10:22 am
Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
Topic: An official revision of Majdanek ?
Replies: 57
Views: 10694

Re: An official revision of Majdanek ?

Goethe: That is unless you think Jews have given up on making 'death camp' claims about Majdanek. Did you even read my posts? I made it clear that I understood that the number of AHGC's claimed by the Majdanek museum has been reduced from 7 down to 2. Does that sound like "I think Jews have giv...
by tomtruthteller
Sat Jan 05, 2013 10:10 am
Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
Topic: another embarrassing 'excavation' / Chelmno
Replies: 39
Views: 8651

Re: another embarrassing 'excavation' / Chelmno

borjastick: Seems to me the Chelmno excavations were done under cover, in secret and without any intention of being scientific and thorough. They were as usual done for PR purposes so as to keep the holocaust in the news. Where are the detailed study reports of the physical excavation process, the p...
by tomtruthteller
Wed Jan 02, 2013 6:41 pm
Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
Topic: An official revision of Majdanek ?
Replies: 57
Views: 10694

Re: An official revision of Majdanek ?

It's a matter of clarity and focus Goethe. If Cole's "Gas Chamber 1" has been admitted by the Majdanek museum to be something other than a HGC, then the questions about it should be purged from his list of questions and the focus should be placed on the two remaining rooms that are still a...
by tomtruthteller
Wed Jan 02, 2013 12:38 pm
Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
Topic: An official revision of Majdanek ?
Replies: 57
Views: 10694

Re: An official revision of Majdanek ?

Thanks again rabbit. So what questions that Cole asked are still relevant? Isn't it time to come up with some new ones?

Also, when you were at Majdanek, did the museum make any claims about mass graves?
by tomtruthteller
Mon Dec 31, 2012 8:15 pm
Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
Topic: An official revision of Majdanek ?
Replies: 57
Views: 10694

Re: An official revision of Majdanek ?

I found this on another thread and thought it would be a good idea to bring it back to life on this thread: Unanswered Questions Regarding the Physical Evidence at the Majdanek Concentration Camp (Poland) from: 'Forty-Six Important Unanswered Questions Regarding the Nazi Gas Chambers' by David Cole ...

Go to advanced search