Search found 19 matches

by MarkTurley
Sun Jul 22, 2007 10:46 am
Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
Topic: The IMT at Nuremberg
Replies: 54
Views: 16650

I'd like to come back on a few of the points raised here. I've read the Weber article before and dipped into bits of Porter. Weber is guilty of the same mistake some of you are making in that he tries to treat all the trials as one animal. The IMT was a separate entity. It was truly international. P...
by MarkTurley
Sat Jul 21, 2007 6:02 pm
Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
Topic: The IMT at Nuremberg
Replies: 54
Views: 16650

also, while i think of it, you quoted this... "There is one known exception. Dr. Otto Zippel, defense attorney of the accused Dr. Bruno Tesch and Karl Weinbacher..." But I'm talking about the IMT. Those people weren't 'accused' by the IMT. They may have been defendants at one of the later ...
by MarkTurley
Sat Jul 21, 2007 5:43 pm
Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
Topic: The IMT at Nuremberg
Replies: 54
Views: 16650

'technical rules of evidence' are not commonly used in all courts. Although it is common practice for American Courts to have 'technical rules', European courts generally don't and never have. As two of the three men (Jackson, Nikitchenko and Falco) who wrote the London charter and set up the IMT we...
by MarkTurley
Sat Jul 21, 2007 10:36 am
Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
Topic: The IMT at Nuremberg
Replies: 54
Views: 16650

The IMT at Nuremberg

I have been investigating the IMT for a little while now and have read opinions from all sides of the debate on it. Am presently weighing them up to try to arrive at some sort of conclusion. I'd be interested to know from some of the revisionists on here how they explain the following two points. 1)...

Go to advanced search