For the Benda quote our in the middle of the MGK blah-blah our silly bugger could have obtained a better translation in my "first round" blog: If I missed it, fine. But Roberto also 'missed' quoting and responding to the part of my post where I explicitly talked about what the hateblogwat...

Remember how Roberto was saying how he found it odd that MGK took three paragraphs in German and reduced it to one paragraph in English? He says, it must be incriminating to their revisionist cause. But if that is the case, then why the hell would they bother to put something incriminating into Germ...

The first highlighted term (Sonderlager) means "special camp", and it may well be the reason, or one of the reasons, why MGK thought it wise to withhold the document’s wording from their readers. Otherwise they would have had to explain why a transit camp, or a transit camp partially conv...

it must stay on the one topic, Kues vs. Muehlenkamp's Sobibor.

And aren't I staying to that by exposing Robert's mistakes with his code language conspiracy theory and his arguments/questions from ignorance? I am confused because I don't know how else I could have tackeld Roberto's problems.

Since the topic is duplicity of Muehlenkamp, I will take this as an invite to attack his tactics. Muehlenkamp has made some errors. Since I wanted to comment on two things Roberto Muehlenkamp talked about in his second round with Kues, I will have to pick one. I choose the Sonder issue (over the Kol...

So what you are saying is that one group of exterminationist theorists is fighting against another? And that the hateblogwatch team thinks Kues is RIGHT? Should I be expected to believe the hateblogwatch side really believes that Kues is correct? Or are they merely pretending to be just to get under...