Kingfisher is correct. Kohlenoxyd is a valid term in German. At least it was.

I agree that this has no impact on the other arguments.

Thanks for the quote, Mkk! Just another in the long series of fabrications, then. No surprise here.

Ingrid Weckert mentioned this letter in " The Gas Vans: A Critical Assessment of the Evidence ", but only mentioned: 1. Letter from the RSHA to the Forensic Institute, Berlin, dated March 26, 1942, (R 58/871 fol. 7); [...] The letter mentioned in point 1. stands on its own and does not req...

Seeing as the thread is not closed yet, I'll take this opportunity and add another photo, from 2000: Auschwitz03.jpg I'll also add this comparison with the broken concrete marked in green (from L to R: 1992, 1991, 1997, 1998, 2000): sigh2.jpg Now, one can obviously see how the angle of the shot and ...

I don't know whether my vote counts, seeing as I'm the debater, but I already asked for the topic to get locked. Me and SKcz, along with everybody else here at CODOH, agree that the hole is not an introduction hole for Zyklon-B. It was made by the Soviets, or more correctly, as SKcz pointed out, the...

Moderator, SKcz is still ignoring the laws of physics. It is clear logic is not his best side. He is ignoring the importance of the broken concrete which is relative to the western edge on the 1997 photo by not comparing it to the 1992 photo. He instead compares it to two useless photographs. He cla...

I completely agree with Hannover that the debate I am having with SKcz is superfluous. But nonetheless, I think it is worth having it, and then locking it. Moderator, I will make my summary short, because unlike SKcz, my explanation is simple. The 1992 photo of Mazal's hole no. 1 (Provan's hole no. ...

http://rt.com/news/anonymous-nazi-hacker-wikileaks-273/ "Anonymous" has decided to start a cyber-war against neo-Nazi websites and any websites related to them a month ago. Related of course by their own definition. Their operation is still going on. Several websites got hacked in the last...

SKcz, you claim my comments were already addressed and "refuted," but you have refuted absolutely nothing. Your tactic is dirty, dishonest, childish and low. I will not tolerate this, hence my harsh tone in my comments. To start of, you claimed you "refuted" my point about the an...

And I've demolished that claim of yours by pointing out here: viewtopic.php?p=49451#p49451 that it is the angle that makes the photo look like that.

Moderator, please lock this thread, this is getting stupid beyond belief.

Somebody please give SKcz a logic lesson, and explain to him that in order to prove that the black square object has moved or increased at its western side, you don't need to use the circled red object on its western side as a reference, because the green square object above it is relative to the we...

I don't have to! I totally and completely refuted every point you're trying to make with my demonstration. You are wrong and that is it. You are avoiding addressing my point because you know I am right. You therefore want me to address your useless points which I've debunked with my latest demonstra...

My god, do you understand logic? Look, let me demonstrate it for you with simple squares: http://oi43.tinypic.com/11s007r.jpg I really can't believe I'm doing this. Do you understand, that if you make the hole bigger, the broken concrete I marked with green, and on this simple demonstration with a g...

SKcz, you're not thinking this through. I didn't show or claim with my picture whether the north side did or did not get altered. I'm using the cracked concrete in green and the other circled spots on the northern side as a point of reference, to show you that the west edge is identical in all the p...

Moderator, I will make my post short this time. SKcz, I will not address your post in its entirety, because it is pointless. Instead, I will show you a picture, a collage of photos, which I've named "sigh" for an obvious reason. sigh.jpg From left to right: 1992 photo, 1991 photo, 1997 pho...