Kingfisher is correct. Kohlenoxyd is a valid term in German. At least it was.
I agree that this has no impact on the other arguments.
Search found 134 matches
- Sun Feb 05, 2012 10:19 am
- Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
- Topic: Walter Rauff, March 26, 1942 letter
- Replies: 11
- Views: 5997
- Sun Feb 05, 2012 9:18 am
- Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
- Topic: Walter Rauff, March 26, 1942 letter
- Replies: 11
- Views: 5997
Re: Walter Rauff, March 26, 1942 letter
Thanks for the quote, Mkk! Just another in the long series of fabrications, then. No surprise here.
- Sun Feb 05, 2012 8:05 am
- Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
- Topic: Walter Rauff, March 26, 1942 letter
- Replies: 11
- Views: 5997
Walter Rauff, March 26, 1942 letter
Ingrid Weckert mentioned this letter in " The Gas Vans: A Critical Assessment of the Evidence ", but only mentioned: 1. Letter from the RSHA to the Forensic Institute, Berlin, dated March 26, 1942, (R 58/871 fol. 7); [...] The letter mentioned in point 1. stands on its own and does not req...
- Sat Feb 04, 2012 3:50 pm
- Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
- Topic: Challenge number 14 - Zyklon B Introduction holes
- Replies: 62
- Views: 18019
Re: Challenge number 14 - Zyklon B Introduction holes
Seeing as the thread is not closed yet, I'll take this opportunity and add another photo, from 2000: Auschwitz03.jpg I'll also add this comparison with the broken concrete marked in green (from L to R: 1992, 1991, 1997, 1998, 2000): sigh2.jpg Now, one can obviously see how the angle of the shot and ...
- Thu Feb 02, 2012 2:39 pm
- Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
- Topic: opinions on: Challenge number 14 - Zyklon B Introductio
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1031
Re: opinions on: Challenge number 14 - Zyklon B Introductio
I don't know whether my vote counts, seeing as I'm the debater, but I already asked for the topic to get locked. Me and SKcz, along with everybody else here at CODOH, agree that the hole is not an introduction hole for Zyklon-B. It was made by the Soviets, or more correctly, as SKcz pointed out, the...
- Thu Feb 02, 2012 11:01 am
- Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
- Topic: Challenge number 14 - Zyklon B Introduction holes
- Replies: 62
- Views: 18019
Re: Challenge number 14 - Zyklon B Introduction holes
Moderator, SKcz is still ignoring the laws of physics. It is clear logic is not his best side. He is ignoring the importance of the broken concrete which is relative to the western edge on the 1997 photo by not comparing it to the 1992 photo. He instead compares it to two useless photographs. He cla...
- Thu Feb 02, 2012 6:52 am
- Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
- Topic: Challenge number 14 - Zyklon B Introduction holes
- Replies: 62
- Views: 18019
Re: Challenge number 14 - Zyklon B Introduction holes
I completely agree with Hannover that the debate I am having with SKcz is superfluous. But nonetheless, I think it is worth having it, and then locking it. Moderator, I will make my summary short, because unlike SKcz, my explanation is simple. The 1992 photo of Mazal's hole no. 1 (Provan's hole no. ...
- Wed Feb 01, 2012 2:20 pm
- Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
- Topic: Warning
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2069
Warning
http://rt.com/news/anonymous-nazi-hacker-wikileaks-273/ "Anonymous" has decided to start a cyber-war against neo-Nazi websites and any websites related to them a month ago. Related of course by their own definition. Their operation is still going on. Several websites got hacked in the last...
- Wed Feb 01, 2012 5:17 am
- Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
- Topic: Challenge number 14 - Zyklon B Introduction holes
- Replies: 62
- Views: 18019
Re: Challenge number 14 - Zyklon B Introduction holes
SKcz, you claim my comments were already addressed and "refuted," but you have refuted absolutely nothing. Your tactic is dirty, dishonest, childish and low. I will not tolerate this, hence my harsh tone in my comments. To start of, you claimed you "refuted" my point about the an...
- Tue Jan 31, 2012 8:25 pm
- Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
- Topic: Challenge number 14 - Zyklon B Introduction holes
- Replies: 62
- Views: 18019
Re: Challenge number 14 - Zyklon B Introduction holes
And I've demolished that claim of yours by pointing out here: viewtopic.php?p=49451#p49451 that it is the angle that makes the photo look like that.
Moderator, please lock this thread, this is getting stupid beyond belief.
Moderator, please lock this thread, this is getting stupid beyond belief.
- Tue Jan 31, 2012 8:07 pm
- Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
- Topic: Challenge number 14 - Zyklon B Introduction holes
- Replies: 62
- Views: 18019
Re: Challenge number 14 - Zyklon B Introduction holes
Somebody please give SKcz a logic lesson, and explain to him that in order to prove that the black square object has moved or increased at its western side, you don't need to use the circled red object on its western side as a reference, because the green square object above it is relative to the we...
- Tue Jan 31, 2012 7:49 pm
- Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
- Topic: Challenge number 14 - Zyklon B Introduction holes
- Replies: 62
- Views: 18019
Re: Challenge number 14 - Zyklon B Introduction holes
I don't have to! I totally and completely refuted every point you're trying to make with my demonstration. You are wrong and that is it. You are avoiding addressing my point because you know I am right. You therefore want me to address your useless points which I've debunked with my latest demonstra...
- Tue Jan 31, 2012 7:38 pm
- Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
- Topic: Challenge number 14 - Zyklon B Introduction holes
- Replies: 62
- Views: 18019
Re: Challenge number 14 - Zyklon B Introduction holes
My god, do you understand logic? Look, let me demonstrate it for you with simple squares: http://oi43.tinypic.com/11s007r.jpg I really can't believe I'm doing this. Do you understand, that if you make the hole bigger, the broken concrete I marked with green, and on this simple demonstration with a g...
- Tue Jan 31, 2012 7:10 pm
- Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
- Topic: Challenge number 14 - Zyklon B Introduction holes
- Replies: 62
- Views: 18019
Re: Challenge number 14 - Zyklon B Introduction holes
SKcz, you're not thinking this through. I didn't show or claim with my picture whether the north side did or did not get altered. I'm using the cracked concrete in green and the other circled spots on the northern side as a point of reference, to show you that the west edge is identical in all the p...
- Tue Jan 31, 2012 3:55 pm
- Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
- Topic: Challenge number 14 - Zyklon B Introduction holes
- Replies: 62
- Views: 18019
Re: Challenge number 14 - Zyklon B Introduction holes
Moderator, I will make my post short this time. SKcz, I will not address your post in its entirety, because it is pointless. Instead, I will show you a picture, a collage of photos, which I've named "sigh" for an obvious reason. sigh.jpg From left to right: 1992 photo, 1991 photo, 1997 pho...