Search found 1651 matches

by Moderator
Wed Jan 15, 2003 8:05 pm
Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
Topic: Manufacturing 'historical facts'
Replies: 33
Views: 21437

Hebden, there is a definite lack of response by you to direct queries about your posts. Respond to them or leave the thread. Please see posted guidelines.

Thanks, Moderator
by Moderator
Fri Jan 03, 2003 6:20 pm
Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
Topic: More document forgeries
Replies: 43
Views: 13769

I hate to get so directly involved, but let's cut to the chase. If you feel the document is a forgery, then say so & why; if not, then say so & why. If the alleged original document is nowhere to be found then say it. Too much sparring and not enough discussion. Stay true to the point of the thread....
by Moderator
Thu Jan 02, 2003 1:36 pm
Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
Topic: the "vergasungskeller" note
Replies: 13
Views: 7030

My apologies to Hebden. In deleting another of alpha's naughty posts, I mistakenly deleted one by Hebden.
Hebden, please repost . I will then try to arrange the order of the posts in the sequence that was intended.

My apologies again to Hebden.

Moderator
by Moderator
Thu Dec 26, 2002 6:04 pm
Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
Topic: Cremation patent & 3.5 kg of coke per corpse debunked
Replies: 17
Views: 21150

Moderating is a no win situation to be in. I hear from Revisionists, I hear from Believers....everyone wants it their way. Without some form of moderation we'll end up like alt. revisionism, a vertitable sewer. Nobody is tossed for their viewpoints on the issues of this forum, they are tossed for th...
by Moderator
Thu Dec 26, 2002 4:42 pm
Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
Topic: Cremation patent & 3.5 kg of coke per corpse debunked
Replies: 17
Views: 21150

Okay gents, let's get back to the topic of the thread.

Thanks, Moderator
by Moderator
Sun Dec 15, 2002 8:41 pm
Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
Topic: fake Einsatzgruppen document
Replies: 72
Views: 27705

Sailor: The point of deleting the post was that it contained nothing relevant to the specific points under discussion, it was a digression/distraction with personal implications; you missed nothing of substance. And yes, having a tough skin is pretty much required for Revisionists. The Forum appreci...
by Moderator
Wed Dec 11, 2002 3:15 am
Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
Topic: Stay on Topic
Replies: 0
Views: 3880

Stay on Topic

Members: I'm seeing a lot of drift, unintentional and otherwise. Remember, there are new readers here everyday, some not well versed in the details. They are looking for specific, understandable points; not wandering digressions. Stay on topic. I suggest that everyone re-read the posting guidelines....
by Moderator
Wed Dec 11, 2002 3:00 am
Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
Topic: Typical nature of Holocaust 'facts'
Replies: 22
Views: 18463

Maybe I should have watched this thread a little closer, but it's gotten out of hand. I won't state who I think is to blame, but I certainly hope that such obfuscation and lack of specific, genuine debate does not occur again.
I've locked this thread.

Moderator
by Moderator
Wed Dec 11, 2002 2:44 am
Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
Topic: attempted switch from alleged diesel 'gassings' to gasoline
Replies: 41
Views: 19674

Okay, everybody got their 2 cents worth; but stay on topic to the original post in the thread.

Thanks, Moderator.
by Moderator
Tue Dec 10, 2002 11:38 am
Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
Topic: Typical nature of Holocaust 'facts'
Replies: 22
Views: 18463

Max:
Clean it up. No personal attacks.

Thanks, Moderator
by Moderator
Mon Dec 09, 2002 11:06 am
Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
Topic: New format
Replies: 1
Views: 3893

Welcome online.

- Moderator
by Moderator
Sun Dec 08, 2002 5:05 pm
Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
Topic: aerial photos
Replies: 29
Views: 28044

Max: Please leave this thread. You are going in circles without addressing challenges to support the points you attempt to make. Rambling assertions without support can only be tolerated so long, I had hoped you would eventually address the challenges. Instead you keep posting while ignoring legitim...
by Moderator
Mon Dec 02, 2002 6:08 pm
Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
Topic: reduce the size of your quotes
Replies: 4
Views: 6568

Nope, let's keep the quotes specific and to the point as stated.

Nope, no dodging.

I have seen nothing that qualifies as spam, but have seen much which qualifies as dodging and cluttering the board. :wink:

- Moderator
by Moderator
Mon Dec 02, 2002 3:36 pm
Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
Topic: reduce the size of your quotes
Replies: 4
Views: 6568

It's really just a volume issue. Large quotes make it difficult and time consuming for the reader to digest. The number of quotes does not seem to be a problem at this point as long as they stay on topic. Also, each thread should be centered on a specific point, rather than wandering all over the pl...
by Moderator
Mon Dec 02, 2002 1:41 pm
Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
Topic: reduce the size of your quotes
Replies: 4
Views: 6568

reduce the size of your quotes

We are getting too much text posted as quotes, please limit them. Pick specific points to quote rather than large amounts of text which clutter the board and make digesting any point more difficult. This is a typical tactic of those who wish to distract and clutter the board. Let's get this under co...

Go to advanced search