Agreed. The exposure of Cole's work would most likely bring in more curiosity which inevitably leads to more doubt, but the underlying problem is the Cole story really isn't getting as much coverage as Revisionists would like. We all know who controls the information, and we know they don't want mor...

Perhaps the Golden Dawn will share their insights when the time comes.

astro3 wrote:
THREE MILLION JEWS - that is the total number of Jews who lived in countries ever occupied by the Nazis during WW2.

That may be the total number of Jews who were willing to be counted, but it's likely that the total number of Jews is far more based on the discussion in this thread.

The Warden wrote: "I respectfully disagree, especially since it took about 4 seconds to see Nordling used Sanning as a source." No. If you had taken 5 seconds, you could have seen (in the very article you quote) that Nordling took 722 identified European Jews from the German sphere of inf...

I respectfully disagree, especially since it took about 4 seconds to see Nordling used Sanning as a source. Sources: Adler, H.G.: Theresienstadt, 1941-1945. Tübingen, 1960 Encyclopaedia Judaica. Jerusalem, 1972. Sanning, W.N.: The Dissolution of Eastern European Jewry. Costa Mesa, California, 1990. ...

Just so everyone is aware, I don't want anyone to think Halakha is some be all, end all to the numbers game. It's just a set of rules to live by, a "path", which people either abide by or not. We all know religions have aspects similar, and we all know a lot of people don't necessarily fol...

Yes, it's called Halakhah or "Halakhan Law. " It's just another reason to understand using population figures to make a case one way or another is nothing but fruit of the poisonous tree. Although the methodologies such as the ones Lohengrin stands by might be foolproof, unless you know th...

Indeed. I started a thread a while back to show just how unreliable ANY population numbers can be when trying to prove either side of the story. There's such a wide range of "proof" and claiming one side is right using those numbers is blatant ignorance of the real issue. It's the typical ...

The U.S. Census didn't record religion as part of their information. Any religious affiliation was recorded by the actual religious groups themselves. Seeing that the theory is "Jews went where Jews are", a certain bias has to be considered with all the known information to date. The Burea...

I remember reading Allegory Of The Cave, and now suddenly it seems poignant.

Jerzy Ulicki-Rek wrote:

Kingfisher wrote:Jerzy, your link doesn't work.

Try this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... KDeyuM0-Og

Jerzy

Fantastic use of sarcasm once again from the white rabbit crew.

Their video about how whites took over America from the Indians is worthy of a viewing as well.

It's crucial that every Revisionist ask themselves:

"Why are Exterminationists constantly trying to prove a story to people who already believe it in the first place?"

I don't have any specific links or videos, but once I started looking into the psychology behind the blind faith believers of religion and other entities that rely on word of mouth, it helped me understand why people insist on perpetuating the Holocaust fables. It's easier to go along to get along r...

I'll have to step in and say I think you're the one who's missing the point here, Jim Voss. It's not what she's claiming that's significant, it's the act of making a claim overall. Holocaust claims or new studies are nothing more than another Holocaust Remembrance Day, another museum opening, anothe...

That's just laughable. This is the best the Industry could afford? Apparently this Sturdy-Colls lady must have some merit to her name otherwise they would never flaunt / hype her the way it's been. Something tells me the Industry must be somewhat disappointed - because what good does these findings...