Search found 134 matches

by Toshiro
Tue Jan 31, 2012 6:18 am
Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
Topic: Challenge number 14 - Zyklon B Introduction holes
Replies: 62
Views: 18051

Re: Challenge number 14 - Zyklon B Introduction holes

Again, you are completely wrong, here is true location of your circled area in photo from 1991 which allegedly match photo in 2004. As you can see, blue circle marks correct location of your circled piece in 1991, see violet border which is almost identical, your red circle is completely off. Is al...
by Toshiro
Mon Jan 30, 2012 7:55 pm
Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
Topic: Challenge number 14 - Zyklon B Introduction holes
Replies: 62
Views: 18051

Re: Challenge number 14 - Zyklon B Introduction holes

I am most certainly not wrong. It's not always on the same place, as evidenced by the 1992 photo, where it is farther from the edge. Once you look at the full-sized photograph , you notice it's actually not a spot at all, but just random luminescence of the flash/sun hitting the concrete. It is obvi...
by Toshiro
Mon Jan 30, 2012 4:19 pm
Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
Topic: Challenge number 14 - Zyklon B Introduction holes
Replies: 62
Views: 18051

Re: Challenge number 14 - Zyklon B Introduction holes

How can I ignore something that isn't even on the photo? That was my point, that that part of the hole/concrete wasn't photographed in those two photos. The photos are clearly cropped before the part seen in the other two photographs. You can't see the trees in the background either, but you know th...
by Toshiro
Mon Jan 30, 2012 3:15 pm
Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
Topic: Mass Graves claimed to be found at Treblinka
Replies: 108
Views: 47726

Re: Mass Graves claimed to be found at Treblinka

From http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-16657363 Bone fragments can still be seen on the surface of the ground, especially after rain. Considerable evidence also exists to suggest that not all of the bodies were exhumed and cremated. Photographs show bodies littering the landscape as late as the ear...
by Toshiro
Mon Jan 30, 2012 3:00 pm
Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
Topic: Challenge number 14 - Zyklon B Introduction holes
Replies: 62
Views: 18051

Re: Challenge number 14 - Zyklon B Introduction holes

I am using logic, Mattogno said "enlarged, especially in its eastern part" which implicate that there are other alterations. If you are correct he would choose different words "enlarged in its eastern part". Sound plausible? So there must be other alterations and I see them easi...
by Toshiro
Mon Jan 30, 2012 4:48 am
Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
Topic: Challenge number 14 - Zyklon B Introduction holes
Replies: 62
Views: 18051

Re: Challenge number 14 - Zyklon B Introduction holes

He did not say the hole was altered at any of those locations, he only said the hole was "enlarged, especially in its eastern part." This does not necessarily mean there were alterations at the other sides, therefore I am not disagreeing with Mattogno at all. My answer is the same for the ...
by Toshiro
Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:25 pm
Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
Topic: Challenge number 14 - Zyklon B Introduction holes
Replies: 62
Views: 18051

Re: Challenge number 14 - Zyklon B Introduction holes

I apologise. It seems to me no alterations were made on the western, northern and southern side, only on eastern and south-eastern, where it was chiselled into a rectangular shape. I don't see any evidence of the western, northern or southern side being altered at all. I'm not saying the hole couldn...
by Toshiro
Sun Jan 29, 2012 8:33 pm
Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
Topic: Challenge number 14 - Zyklon B Introduction holes
Replies: 62
Views: 18051

Re: Challenge number 14 - Zyklon B Introduction holes

He was mistaken only in captioning it "hole no. 7." In the English version of his article, he corrected the mistake: http://vho.org/GB/c/CM/noholes.html Photograph 26: "Hole no. 2 in October 1991" It doesn't "fill up," it's the angle! It looks that way because of the an...
by Toshiro
Sun Jan 29, 2012 6:24 pm
Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
Topic: Challenge number 14 - Zyklon B Introduction holes
Replies: 62
Views: 18051

Re: Challenge number 14 - Zyklon B Introduction holes

Would someone else be willing to try and make a model of a 70x70 cm and 50x50 cm holes on this photo: http://oi44.tinypic.com/98gkjp.jpg According to these measurements: Nevertheless, when I measured it in June 1990, hole no.2 had a trapezoidal form of greatest side 86 cm and a maximum breadth of 50...
by Toshiro
Sun Jan 29, 2012 5:34 pm
Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
Topic: Challenge number 14 - Zyklon B Introduction holes
Replies: 62
Views: 18051

Re: Challenge number 14 - Zyklon B Introduction holes

http://www.vho.org/VffG/2002/3/Mattogno284-304.html

Fotografie 26

I don't know why it says hole no. 7. It's a mistake on Mattogno's part.
by Toshiro
Sun Jan 29, 2012 5:24 pm
Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
Topic: Challenge number 14 - Zyklon B Introduction holes
Replies: 62
Views: 18051

Re: Challenge number 14 - Zyklon B Introduction holes

The photo on the left is from 1991, the one one the right is 1992. According to you, the hole got filled up.

For the last time, it's the angle that is distorting the photo.
by Toshiro
Sun Jan 29, 2012 4:49 pm
Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
Topic: Challenge number 14 - Zyklon B Introduction holes
Replies: 62
Views: 18051

Re: Challenge number 14 - Zyklon B Introduction holes

You should have inverted the photo like this: http://oi40.tinypic.com/atonpu.jpg The angle is too different. It is not "almost the same." It's because of the distortion that your eyes are playing a trick on you. Look at photo 4 that I have posted (now flipped): 4.jpg It was taken in Octobe...
by Toshiro
Sun Jan 29, 2012 3:34 pm
Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
Topic: Challenge number 14 - Zyklon B Introduction holes
Replies: 62
Views: 18051

Re: Challenge number 14 - Zyklon B Introduction holes

No way that hole in 1992 was 50cm, is clearly visible that hole in 1997 is larger and vertical side is longer, you can even see the remainnig rebars which were exposed by removing of concrete. In 1992, this rebar was almost whole covered. The angle is almost the same, no major distortion. The July ...
by Toshiro
Sun Jan 29, 2012 11:16 am
Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
Topic: Challenge number 14 - Zyklon B Introduction holes
Replies: 62
Views: 18051

Re: Challenge number 14 - Zyklon B Introduction holes

Good point, I didn't think of that. I wonder why Mattogno didn't provide a measurement for his 1997 photo, seeing as he had a ruler placed over the hole. Ah well. Mazal et al. said "We estimate its size at approximately 0.5 m square," note the "estimate." If they had measured it ...
by Toshiro
Sun Jan 29, 2012 6:43 am
Forum: 'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News
Topic: Challenge number 14 - Zyklon B Introduction holes
Replies: 62
Views: 18051

Re: Challenge number 14 - Zyklon B Introduction holes

You are too generous, you used photos from time when the hole was already altered as is shown with comparisons, in 1945 and in 1992, the hole is clearly smaller so believers must change the dimensions far below 40cm, when we take into consideration that according to believers the holes were "m...

Go to advanced search