I see one 'document' that attempts to look like a scan of an original:
and it has no signature or following pages that I can see, it has been cropped (see bottom).
The rest are someone's claimed text, not authentic German documents. What are they trying to hide?
Did I miss something?
The last three examples of German documents with 1005 on them are not actual examples. They are block quotations from entire documents that are not presented. Romanov scolds us for not believing him simply because he takes scans from books that OTHER AUTHORS have written. He scolds us for not believing in SECONDARY SOURCES. He says the footnotes point to the archive location. FINE. GO TO THE ARCHIVES AND GET THEM AND PROVE TO US THEY ARE ORIGINALS OR AT LEAST COPIES OF AUTHENTIC ORIGINALS! This lack of evidence undercuts their argument against Mattogno that Mattogno incorrectly blames the Soviets for conjuring up aktion 1005. Even if Mattogno did claim with little or no evidence it was Soviets specifically, I guess you are correct I should stop caring why. Even if Germans did testify to 1005 willingly to the Americans without any Soviets in the picture, Romanov can claim victory if he wants. OH WAIT NO HE CAN'T. HE CAN'T SHOW US ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS. He loses.
Can you tell us Werd, where exactly the so-called "Soviet liberators and Polish grave robbers did find human remains including ashes, bones and skulls?"
And don't forget to prove your claims with " those famous photos from the ghetto fighters house."
The photos alleged to be taken in Belzec that are in the ghetto fighters house photo collection I can not prove they were taken at Belzec. How about some motion picture of the digs in the forties showing people taking photographs and then showing people collecting the skeletal remains, trucking them to a lab and doing tests and then locking them in an archive with proper labels? None of that was done so revisionists are not under any obligation to believe the holocaust lobby.
The photos alleged to be taken in Treblinka showing ash mounds I can not prove they were taken in Treblinka, nor can I prove they were all ash, or some ash, or none ash mixed with dirt. There is a severe lack of photographic documentation about the human remains alleged to be at Treblinka. The report from Lukaszkiewicz does not prove the holocaust and there is no corresponding photographic evidence to prove the bits of bone, intestines and partially decayed flesh he claims he found. Nobody has found any proof of mass graves at either Belzec, Treblinka or Sobibor.
I'll bet you that you can't prove that the remains of 10 people currently exist at Belzec, Chelmno or Treblinka.
I'll bet you that you can't prove that the remains of 20 people currently exist at Sobibor. (Where a total of 10 skeletons have been located / proven to exist in a total of 4 graves.)
And I'll bet you that you can't prove even one extant grave currently exists at Belzec or Treblinka.
And I'll bet you that you can't prove even one mass grave containing just 1 / 1,000 of 1% - of the fraudulently alleged buried remains claims ever existed at Belzec or Treblinka.
Well I can not. I can not even prove that Kola's dig at Belzec in 1997 found ANY human remains. No photos. No lab analysis exists. Just pencil drawings.
Do mass graves exist at Belzec that contain "corpses in wax fat transformation"?
If the holocaust lobby wants me to stop being a revisionist, they should have then, and should forever now, they should fund PROPER ARCHAEOLOGICAL DIGS and not this hoax shit that passes for science. VIDEO EVIDENCE OF WHAT KOLA FOUND IS LACKING. SO IS PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE. ERGO, THERE IS NO PROOF OF ANY HUMAN REMAINS AT BELZEC.
Regarding the supposed Jews dead from the Einsatzgruppen...
100 graves of 20,000?
200 graves of 10,000?
400 graves of 5,000?
500 graves of 4,000?
1000 graves of 2000?
2000 graves of 1000?
Debois is LYING LYING LYING when he claims he knows of hundreds of unopened mass graves. His lack of proper archaeological methods, and also the lack of creativity I have shown here, viewtopic.php?f=2&t=9171&start=15
PROVES the small graves that we have found SO FAR like the ones at Busk do not contain as many corpses as they claim. If they did, they would show it. They have not and will not due to BULLSHIT RELIGIOUS LAWS that are allowed to trump science.
When you say "destroyed" Werd, do you mean annihilated / obliterated?
Could you tell us how this process of annihilation worked at the camps Werd?
Can you show us just one mass grave that was opened by this alleged "Aktion 1005" group?
Were these phantom mass graves "opened / dug up and destroyed"?
Why should I as a revisionist tell you what holocaust idiots believe as if I am one of them. There was no process of annihilation in the camp.
Secondly, if the graves of Jews were opened up and burned to cover the tracks of the Einsatzgruppen, then there would be no graves to examine. Ariel photographs and GPR and LIDAR would have to be used at these alleged Einsatzgruppen created mass grave sites. And yet, nothing. Ariel photographs disprove the Babi Yar claims. Clearly the 2,000,000 IS IMPOSSIBLE!
Werd, if you believe communists Lukaszkiewicz and his "investigation team" then it is incumbent upon you to actually produce proof for their fall back claims. If what they claim is fact then that proof would be readily available, it would be blazing through the media 24/7.
I already said on page ago in this topic, I admit I can not prove anything Lukaszkiewicz wrote in his report about his alleged finds.
- If there were remains of the people in the ground as alleged then why can't they be shown?
- Why hasn't there been a verifiable excavation?
- Where are the photos of this claimed site? If true this would be a big time crime scene with huge promotional potential for the communists / Zionists. Photos are essential for any legit, actual forensic examination.
- What outside observers were brought in to verify the claimed finds?
- Why should Polish communists under the watchful eye of their masters, communist Soviets, be considered the least bit reliable?
NO PHOTOS. NO VIDEO EVIDENCE. NOTHING! I can't show it because the holocaust lobby can't show it either!
You can't be serious in quoting the thoroughly debunked Franz Suchomel.
That liar has been demolished repeatedly at this forum and elsewhere, see:
'Franz Suchomel's 'confession' demolished by Jean-Francois Beaulieu'
The Shoah must go on / Suchomel
Well I agree he is questionable. No doubt about it. But the claim that he shot some sick people to put them out of their misery is not proven by any document or photo. However, Morrison admitted it was possible. But possible does not mean did. I fully understand that. Given the pressure many German defendants were under, and that clear cases of perjury by Jews, Poles and Soviets WAS NEVER PUNISHED, no one has the right to pretend trials were fair. Ergo, so called confessions unless backed up by solid evidence ARE WORTHLESS. I am agreeing with the revisionist position. Because I am one.