Atigun wrote: Nessie.. wrote:
Atigun wrote:The reason Nessie isn't going to respond to any questions on CODOH is because he hasn't any answers. For example, he shows a photo of a few objects held in someone's hand and says, "See, those are bones and they prove that 250,000 Jews were killed at Sobibor." Really? Where is the chain of evidence? Where is the laboratory analysis proving them human bones? Why does so few objects "prove" that 250,000 people were killed at Sobibor? You're empty, Nessie. You've got zip, zero, nada.
I do have the answers, which I post on another forum.
You have misrepresented and made up a quote about my argument regarding the evidence found at Sobibor.
The objects and finds of bones, bits of bone and ash at Sobibor corroborate the witnesses who say the site was used to kill most of those transported there. The bodies were buried, then exhumed, cremated and reburied mixed in with the earth. Further evidence of Sobibor as a death camp comes from the mass transports that arrived there and no evidence for mass transports back out again. So the claim of have have zip is also wrong.
If you have posted your answers on a different forum, then post them here.
I do and they go for moderation and then never appear.
Atigun wrote: I have misrepresented nothing.
You made up a quote which claims I have said a few bones proves 250,000 were killed at Sobibor. That is not true and it is a misrepresentation of my actual argument.
Atigun wrote: I've asked you some very straight forward questions which you refuse to answer. Where IS your chain of evidence? You seem to expect us to accept the word of people wholly committed to the holyhoax. Where IS the laboratory analysis proving not only that they are human bones but the bones of Jews? How does such a small, dubious sample corroborate the tales of known liars? Your admission that the stories of Hannover's list of fanciful tales are lies but THESE tales can be accepted at face value with NO testing whatsoever is ridiculous. Again, I ask the questions previously cited.
I have corroborative evidence for the role of Sobibor.
- The earliest evidence were those who were selected to work elsewhere or at the camp and survived. They speak to leaving the vast majority of people they arrived with at the camp and never seeing them again. Those who worked at the camp speak to the rest being lead to one part of the camp and never being seen again.
- That evidence is corroborated by a lack of any documents showing mass transports to or arrivals at other camps, so proving the alleged role of Sobibor as a transit camp.
- It is further corroborated by the non appearance of many Jews at the end of the war. Most notably only 18 Dutch Jews returned to the Netherlands.
- Then comes the evidence of those who escaped and they speak to its role as a death camp with reports of the use of gassing and the initial use of mass graves.
- Then comes the evidence of captured Nazis who admitted to the role of the camp as a death camp.
- To see if the above was true or not archaeologists have been to the camp, studied it and found what the witnesses said would there and where they said it would be. So the layout of the camp, where the building used as gas chambers and where the cremains are matches.
Your demand for lab analysis to see if the bones are from Jews is unreasonable because it cannot be done. Your doubt over the lab test that was done is just that, a doubt. When numerous archaeologists accept what they found is bone and we have no evidence to show it is anything other than human, that is good enough for any reasonable person.