According to a friend who said:
no, if someone questions it, they aren't put in jail
Anyone knows? Sorry for the silly question, but i just need to know.
[subject line edited for clarity, Moderator]
Moderator: Moderator
no, if someone questions it, they aren't put in jail
Aufdenblatten: "In your opinion were mass gassings with Zyklon B possible?"
Froelich: "No".
Aufdenblatten: "Why not?"
Froelich: "The pesticide Zyklon B is hydrocyanic acid absorbed in a granular-shaped carrier substance. It is released though contact with the air. The evaporation point of hydrocyanic acid is 25.7 degrees (Celsius). The higher the temperature, the more rapid is the rate of evaporation. The delousing chambers in which Zyklon B was used in NS (German wartime) camps and elsewhere were heated to 30 degrees and higher, so that the hydrocyanic acid would be released rapidly from the carrier granules.
However, in the half-underground mortuaries of the Auschwitz-Birkenau crematories, where witnesses claim that mass killings with Zyklon B took place, the temperatures were much lower. Even if one allows for the warming of the spaces by the body warmth of the hypothetical prisoners, the temperature would not have been more than 15 degrees, even in summer time. Consequently, it would have taken many hours for the hydrocyanic acid to evaporate."
"According to eyewitness reports, the victims died very quickly. The witnesses mention time frames of 'instantaneous' to '15 minutes'. To be able to kill the gas chamber prisoners in such a short time, the Germans would have had to use ridiculously large amounts of Zyklon -- I estimate from 40 to 50 kilograms for each gassing. This would have made any work in the gas chamber fundamentally impossible. The special detachment (Sonderkommando) people, whom the witnesses say were assigned the task of clearing out (dead bodies) from them (the gas chambers), would have collapsed immediately upon entering the rooms, even if they were wearing gas masks. Enormous amounts of hydrocyanic acid would have streamed out into the open, and would have poisoned the entire camp".
Aufdenblatten: "I hereby ask the court to bring charges against you for racial discrimination, on the basis of Article 261 (the Anti-Racism Law) or otherwise I'll do it myself".
Judge Andrea Staubli (to Graf): "Can't you imagine that Jews feel offended by your books?"
Graf: "Yes, and many non-Jews as well. The brain-washing has been so thorough that anyone who inadvertently stumbles upon the truth would be completely upset".
Staubli: "And don't you care if Jews feel offended by your books?"
Graf: "Edgar Bronfman (the president of the Jewish World Congress) said recently that Switzerland is like a man who has to have his feet held in the fire before he sees reason. Can't you imagine that a Swiss person would feel offended by that? Why is it that only Jewish feelings are taken into account and never the feelings of non-Jews?"
We can no doubt spend hours listing people prosecuted for Revisionist study and distribution of Revisionist material, and we can expand that list to include others who have had phony charges brought about against them as a result of real or perceived Revisionist beliefs. But in reality, there is no Gestapo that lurks in the Shadows waiting to pounce on any and every Revisionist. It is an exaggeration to say so.
Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”
Users browsing this forum: borjastick and 9 guests