Revisionist expressions, words of wisdom, humor, etc. / add yours

[Hannover]

Here's an opportunity to vent a little by posting your favorite Revisionist expressions, words of wisdom, humor, etc. Within reason of course.

I'll start with a few of my favorites:

You can be friends with almost anyone as long as you don't discuss politics, religion, or history. They are all the same.

and:

All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
- Arthur Schopenhauer

and:.

The 'holocaust', falling apart faster than a cheap suit.

- Hannover

The 'holocaust' storyline is one of the most easily debunked narratives ever contrived. That is why those who question it are arrested and persecuted. That is why violent, racist, & privileged Jewish supremacists demand censorship. What sort of truth is it that denies free speech and the freedom to seek the truth? Truth needs no protection from scrutiny.

The tide is turning.

[borjastick]

My instant thought when reading your topic Hannover is this beauty -

It was real, in my mind

[k0nsl]

Well, instantly these come to mind:

I do not regret anything.

Source & more: https://quotes.k0nsl.org/rudolf-hess-his-last-words-before-final-jugdment.html

50 years of never-ending defamation, ugly lies and the demonization of an entire people are enough.

Source: https://quotes.k0nsl.org/reinhold-elstner-your-death-is-our-beacon.html

A historical event that is true can stand on its own merits. The story of what happened to the Jews during WWII can not stand on its own merits; it requires imprisonment of researchers; imprisonment of individuals who question aspects of it; it feels it necessary to utilize torture to get a confession out of those who served in those fateful years; it required several foul show trials to establish itself as "proven history".

Source: https://quotes.k0nsl.org/real-history-doesn-t-need-protection-of-law-to-stand-firm.html

These were not SS madmen. They were the bravest of the brave. Those who traffic in the Holocaust are neither brave nor honourable. Just low and greedy.

Source: https://quotes.k0nsl.org/adolf-hitler-s-glorious-men-were-the-bravest-of-the-brave.html

It’s all lies and propaganda.

Source: https://quotes.k0nsl.org/mengele-s-second-wife-it-s-all-lies.html

A footnote of hindsight and one which I hope many British men and women would agree with 100% today:

My wife's grandfather landed in Normandy in 1944 and before he died in 1995 he said that "if he and his comrades could have seen how bad Britain would get they would have thrown down their weapons and joined the Germans."

Source: https://quotes.k0nsl.org/my-wife-s-grandfather-said-he-would-have-joined-the-germans.html

And here, we can read about a violent 'holocaust' believer:

Andrew Mathis is a guy who says that he would "deck" 78 year old Robert Faurisson if this veteran revisionist told him to show or draw a "Nazi gas chamber". As Rudolf wrote in his Lectures, people who use violence or threats of violence instead of real arguments should not be debated with.

Source: https://quotes.k0nsl.org/mathis-would-deck-prof-robert-faurisson.html

They surprise me, all those Jews along with all the people who live in the panicky fear that they have, and rightly so, of those whom I call “the Jewish-Jews”. They think I can be intimidated; however I can say that, although I have often felt fear, discouragement, anxiety, I have never known timidity.

Source: https://quotes.k0nsl.org/prof-robert-faurisson-they-think-i-can-be-intimidated.html

The fact is that not a single revisionist has ever advocated or used violence against their opponents or anyone else for that matter. On the contrary, revisionists are peaceful and peace-loving people.

Source: https://quotes.k0nsl.org/holocaust-revisionists-are-peaceful-people.html

And the best:

Truth is hate, to those who hate truth.

Source: https://quotes.k0nsl.org/truth-is-hate-to-those-who-hate-truth.html

Best wishes,
-k0nsl

[Dresden]

k0nsl said:

Laurentz Dahl wrote:
Andrew Mathis is a guy who says that he would "deck" 78 year old Robert Faurisson if this veteran revisionist told him to show or draw a "Nazi gas chamber". As Rudolf wrote in his Lectures, people who use violence or threats of violence instead of real arguments should not be debated with.

Source: https://quotes.k0nsl.org/mathis-would-d ... isson.html

"The Argument from Intimidation is a confession of intellectual impotence" - Ayn Rand

[Dresden]

"I am willing to go to prison for the sake of the truth and the German nation. ... You are determined to destroy my convictions by imprisoning me, but it is beyond your power to do so." - Sylvia Stolz

[Dresden]

"I take a position in support of radical free speech. Speech is an (almost) absolute right. There is virtually no topic that should be out of bounds. Barring only such obscure cases as an immediate threat to human life (one thinks of the contrived example of “crying fire in a crowded theater”), no words or ideas should be beyond discussion. I support vigorous and open debate on every conceivable topic, the Holocaust included. Suppressing speech only drives it underground, and can only lead to unethical and reprehensible manipulation of the public’s ability to think for itself. Those in power always have reason to fear free speech—all the more reason to defend it" - Thomas Dalton

[Dresden]

A lie should be trampled on and extinguished wherever found. I am for fumigating the atmosphere when I suspect that falsehood, like pestilence, breathes around me.
–Thomas Carlyle

Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire

[Dresden]

Now, what I need to understand (I need this) is why so many in the press and media, and in the universities, accept at face value what an Elie Wiesel or any of the cultists he surrounds himself with have to say about the Holocaust, the "death camps," or anything else. On the face of it, either they are fools or believe you are. Maybe, just maybe, they believe what they are telling you about those matters, but maybe, just maybe, their contempt for your intelligence and your character is beyond anything you could ever have imagined. -- Bradley Smith

[Dresden]

Dr. Roger Dommergue Polacco de Menasce, a French Jewish historian said:

"The only thing we know about Hitler, is that he killed six million Jew that never existed, in gas chambers that nobody ever saw"

------------------------------------------------------------

Raul Hilberg throws in the towel and claims it was done by mental telepathy:

But what began in 1941 was a process of destruction not planned in advance, not organized centrally by any agency. There was no blueprint and there was no budget for destructive measures. They [these measures] were taken step by step, one step at a time. Thus came about not so much a plan being carried out, but an incredible meeting of minds, a consensus -- mind reading by a far-flung bureaucracy.

Quoted in: George De Wan, "The Holocaust in Perspective," Newsday (Long Island, New York), Feb. 23, 1983, p. II/3. Also quoted in the Summer 1985 Journal, pp. 170-171

[Dresden]

Winston Churchill:

"We slaughtered the wrong pig"

[Dresden]

Pierre Vidal-Naquet, along with Léon Poliakov, published in Le Monde on 21 February 1979, page 23, which was signed by 34 historians:


It is not necessary to ask how, technically, such a mass murder was possible. It was possible technically since it took place. That is the necessary point of departure for any historical inquiry on this subject. It is our function simply to recall that truth: there is not, there cannot be, any debate about the existence of the gas chambers.

[hermod]

"Ninety-nine per cent of what we know [about mass murder at Auschwitz-Birkenau] we do not actually have the physical evidence to prove... It has become part of our inherited knowledge." - Auschwitz exterminationist 'expert' Robert Jan Van Pelt, The Star, "A case for letting nature take back Auschwitz", 27 December 2009.

"The consequence of the absence of any overt documentary evidence of gas chambers at these camps, coupled with the lack of archaeological evidence, means that reliance has to be placed on eye witness and circumstantial evidence." - Justice Gray, Irving-Lipstadt trial, 2000

"The archives torn from the bowels of the Third Reich, the depostions and accounts of its chiefs permit us to reconstruct in their least detail the birth and the development of its plans for aggression, its military campaigns, and the whole range of processes by which the Nazis intended to reshape the world to their pattern. Only the campaign to exterminate the Jews, as concerns its completion, as well as in many other essential aspects, remains steeped in fog. Psychological inferences and considerations, third- or fourth-hand accounts, allow us to reconstruct the developments with a considerable verisimilitude. Certain details, nevertheless, will remain unknown forever. As concerns the concept proper of the plan for total extermination, the three or four principal actors are dead. No document remains, and has perhaps never existed." - Léon Poliakov, Bréviaire de la haine (Breviary of Hate) , Paris, 1979, p. 134.

[Dresden]

hermod said:

"No document remains, and has perhaps never existed" - Léon Poliakov

"The Holocaust is the most documented event in world history" -- Anonymous

[Dresden]

"Mother Nature is a Holocaust Denier" -- Steve F

[hermod]