Myself and others have indeed cited "witnesses" and then shown how absurd their claims are.
After citing shyster Gisella Perl you don't dare quote others because you know your head will be handed to you when you do. One helluva embarrassing situation for you to be in. See previous posts & read on.
Time to grow up, onetruth.
IOW, you cannot prove what you claim.
I also assume you believe in witchcraft and sorcery where there were thousands upon thousands of "eyewitnesses, survivors , & confessions" from all over the world.
Here you go, 'photo' of Mengele's twins. Fake as can be.
Only desperate liars need to use fakes.
Oh yes, your "role model" and "witness" Gisella Perl, claimed the impossible:
Like big, black clouds, the smoke of the crematorium hung over the camp. Sharp, red tongues of flame behind the sky, and the air was full of the nauseating smell of burning flesh."
Peleg, Roni. "Gisella Perl: A Jewish Gynecologist in Auschwitz." Journal's of Women's Health 14 (2005) 588-91. Liebert Online. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. Publishers. 14 Feb. 2009
It was simply impossible for the crematorium at Auschwitz to have emitted "sharp, red tongues of flame" unless there were destructive, big time malfunction fires which would have destroyed the facility.
And why don't the countless photos (including many aerial shots) of Auschwitz show us 'the big, black clouds of smoke'?
Read hilarious & impossible copy-cat claims at:
'Testimonies on flames from Auschwitz crematorium chimneys,viewtopic.php?f=2&t=7538
And of course this forum has "witness" Gisella Perl's absurdities further covered here, see:
'Gisella Perl and Olga Lengyel - two lying Zionists'viewtopic.php?t=1095
Once again and no dodging:
- Now please give us your proof and do quote so called "witnesses" in their entirety.
- Please tell us which trial they testified in, give us their verbatim testimony, and give us the verbatim cross examination text.
You really do need to read the previously posted:http://www.inconvenienthistory.com/arch ... _twins.php
Alone the fact that one may not question the Jewish "holocaust" and that Jewish pressure has inflicted laws on democratic societies to prevent questions—while incessant promotion and indoctrination of the same averredly incontestable ‘holocaust’ occur—gives the game away. It proves that it must be a lie. Why else would one not be allowed to question it? Because it might offend the "survivors"? Because it "dishonors the dead"? Hardly sufficient reason to outlaw discussion. No, because the exposure of this leading lie might precipitate questions about so many other lies and cause the whole ramshackle fabrication to crumble."
- Gerard Menuhin / Revisionist Jew, son of famous violinist
Such is the impossible 'holocau$t' storyline.