However it appears he is afraid to respond to my challenges on his 'holocaust' lite claims.
For background I refer you to:
'Lipstadt, Amalek and Irving'
I.E.: Michael Hoffman was asked by forum participant onetruth:
Mr Hoffman ,
I wonder if you you can clear the following point to us.
Is it not true , that you , like David Irving today , admit to mass killing of Jews by the nazis ?
Have you not stated the following :
"Judaic people suffered severe and unconscionable persecution during World War II, including mass murder at the hands of the Nazis. I deplore these crimes and the criminal Nazi ideology which inspired and directed them. "
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_A ... te_note-11
can you clear out this point ?
1. I believe that Judaic persons were mass murdered by Einsatzgruppen units following the NS invasion of Russia, and I believe that Judaic people were mass murdered in the ghettos of the Eastern territories.
2. I do not believe anyone was ever gassed to death at Auschwitz-Birkenau. I have been a skeptic in this regard since 1969, when, as an adolescent, I obtained a copy of David Hoggan's The Myth of the Six Million.
3. I don’t know what happened at Treblinka, Sobibor and Chelmno, but predicated on the available evidence thus far presented, I have misgivings about the execution gassing claims made for those sites.
4. With regard to World War II historiography, my primary interest is in the psychology and epistemology of “Holocaust” Newspeak.
I have been working for nearly four years on a large book devoted to crafting a new history of the Catholic Church in the Renaissance. I cannot afford to take the time to undertake a debate concerning my views of National Socialist mass murder during World War II.
Moreover, when and if I would have time to undertake such an exchange or debate, I would not do so in an Internet forum. With all due respect to Codoh, my experience has been that sites that permit posts by anonymous persons attract a fairly sizable number of trolls who are not interested in truly sharing knowledge about substantive issues, but have a psychological need to engage in ad hominem attack and calumny, which strikes this writer as having parallels with the Zionist and Talmudic mentality.
Furthermore, while I am not in contact and have little or nothing in common with David Cole or Mark Weber, if I am not mistaken it seems that those individuals believe that the NS government was guilty of the mass murder of Judaic persons, and though I certainly do not presume to speak for them, it may be possible that one or the other of these gentlemen might perhaps be willing to dialogue or debate with you concerning this matter. I don't know. You would have to ask them.
For your information, on Sept. 29, 2016, Mr. Cole published a column titled "Denial is Dead" (http://takimag.com/article/denial_is_dead_david_cole/print).
I disagree with the tenor of Cole's column, as well as several points he attempts to assert. I bring the column to your attention because it would seem that Mr. Cole is a prominent part of the revise-the-revisionists trend. His criticisms, despite the regrettable tone he adopts, are worthy of serious consideration. Informed criticism can only make WWII revisionism stronger.
I hope revisionism, which is an intellectual adventure engaged in perpetual questioning, investigating and seeking, will never become a dogma captive to propaganda needs related to rehabilitating the reputation of Adolf Hitler, or any of the other agendas both overt and covert that threaten its great mission of opposition to all dogma.
Michael Hoffmann, you said. I believe that Judaic persons were mass murdered by Einsatzgruppen units following the NS invasion of Russia, and I believe that Judaic people were mass murdered in the ghettos of the Eastern territories.
You are hereby challenged. And please, no dodging.
Seriously? Based upon what proof?
The Indu$try claims that ca. 2,000,000 Jews were killed by the Einsatzgruppen, so please show us the excavated enormous mass graves that are claimed to exist and their locations allegedly known.
100 graves of 20,000?
200 graves of 10,000?
400 graves of 5,000?
500 graves of 4,000?
1000 graves of 2000?
2000 graves of 1000?
'Mass murder in the ghettos'?
Again, show us the massive remains of Jews that would necessarily exist if your beliefs are factual.
David Cole basically is playing the 'holocau$t' lite game, like Irving and yourself.
I recommend you read these before attempting to defend your position.
'Eric Hunt's response to David Cole'
'Irving's 'holocaust' lite / but what '2.4 million document'?'
'Irving attempts 'rehabilitation' via the Hoefle Telegram'
'Grubach's Letters to David Irving on the Hoefle telegram'
The 'holocaust' storyline is one of the most easily debunked narratives ever contrived. That is why those who question it are arrested and persecuted. That is why violent, racist, & privileged Jewish supremacists demand censorship. What sort of truth is it that denies free speech and the freedom to seek the truth? Truth needs no protection from scrutiny.
The tide is turning.
after a few days I posted:
Michael Hoffmann, why are you dodging the posted challenges put to you concerning your statement?I believe that Judaic persons were mass murdered by Einsatzgruppen units following the NS invasion of Russia, and I believe that Judaic people were mass murdered in the ghettos of the Eastern territories.
Dodging is not permitted at this forum, please read the forum guidelines that you agreed to.
To cut to the chase, Hoffman is saying that I was off topic in a thread where he responded to onetruth on that "off topic" question put to him.
And he says he has no time to respond to me, although he has plenty of time to make numerous posts in that thread and respond to onetruth. Again, see thread for specifics & my responses.
In essence, I feel that Michael Hoffman simply knows his posted views will not stand up to scrutiny and is making excuses to avoid embarrassment.
I hereby call out Michael Hoffman on this assertions in this separate thread.
Can someone who has a website called: http://www.revisionisthistory.org/ be credible if he runs from debate concerning his claims, can he be legitimately called a Revisionist?
BTW, in that cited thread I stated for clarification:
I have no doubt that the Einsatzgrupen shot non-uniformed terrorists / 'partisans', it was the norm in all wars by everyone involved and was legal under international law.
Also, the fact that Jews were heavily represented in these terrorist groups is well established.
Of course one is left wondering why these Jews didn't man up and join the Red Army. Hmm.
Having said that, it appears that we are talking apples & Hoffmann is talking oranges.
Comments welcomed from all.
Dare to examine the absurd & laughable 'holocaust' storyline rationally, logically, scientifically and it falls apart like the house-of-cards that it is.