The Holocaust: A New History. New book by Laurence Rees

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
User avatar
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2690
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 5:52 am
Location: Europe

Re: The Holocaust: A New History. New book by Laurence Rees

Postby borjastick » 3 years 8 months ago (Sat Feb 04, 2017 6:03 am)

Revisionists "tearing Europe apart"?
Europe IS being torn apart as we speak, not by Revisionists, but by totalitarian, antiquated, unelected Marxists (EU) that have seized power.
Indigenous Europeans are now in serious resist-mode.
- Hannover.

Yes indeed.

To me there are two drivers behind all of this and they are mutually beneficial and inseparable.

The first is of course the Holocaust.

The second driver is this...

The Coudenhove-Kalergi plan explained here - ... of-europe/
'Of the four million Jews under Nazi control in WW2, six million died and alas only five million survived.'

'We don't need evidence, we have survivors' - israeli politician

Posts: 19
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2017 1:39 pm

Re: The Holocaust: A New History. New book by Laurence Rees

Postby ChronoMachete » 3 years 8 months ago (Sat Feb 04, 2017 1:25 pm)

I'm honestly surprised that the replies to my comment seem to think I was implying revisionists are tearing Europe apart - which is not what I actually posted. I commented saying that this is what the rest of the world fears, because they've been led to believe that the National Socialists committed horrible atrocities and attempted to seize control of Europe. After the war ended, of course people would be afraid of revisionists, because in their mind they must be neo-Nazis trying to repeat their concept of history. Hence, when somebody like Zundel came into the public eye, it only fueled that fire.

cold beer
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 609
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2013 8:48 pm

Re: The Holocaust: A New History. New book by Laurence Rees

Postby cold beer » 3 years 8 months ago (Sat Feb 04, 2017 1:47 pm)

ChronoMachete wrote:What historians would actually consider legitimate would actually be to look at the NS and Hitler: What is the evidence for the extermination plan in their documents? Something like that would be a great starting point, then revisionists could just work their way down to the camps and such.

I couldn't agree with this if I wanted to.
First there are major problems with the chain of evidence regarding documents in general being that they were put in the custody of jewish prosecutors conducting show trials.
Obviously there is a need to discredit false claims, to challenge the authenticity and interpretation of 'documentary evidence'.
Revisionists can't allow exterminations to run rampant without response but they can't get trapped there.
That would play right into the hands of exterminationists because the focus would be away from where it should be...the physical evidence.
As far as David Irving, is he a revisionist?
Whatever he did in the past has been largely negated by his current 'work'.

Exterminationists are doing an effective job of employing debate tactics and ad hominem attacks and moralising to bury any effort by revisionists to move the focus to physical evidence and forensic investigation.
1. Revisionists need to refine the manner in which they present their argument. They need to captivate the audience
2. And they need to destroy the false image of jew innocence which has been cultivated over decades.
That is the holocaust industry's iron dome.
Revisionists need to engage in moralising of their own and win the war of emotion before they can hope to get an wide audience to look at the evidence rationally.

Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Archie and 5 guests