k0nsl wrote:It doesn't any longer. I decided to suspend it as I do not want to endorse anti-German filth on my servers. I feel sorry for Mr. Hunt as I am sure he is being under some very heavy pressure at the moment. However, the best thing we can do is to distance ourselves from him. His past works, as Hannover noted, speaks for itself. Great stuff, all of it.
His conversion into a 'holocaust' enforcer (or believer) was the most laughable thing I have ever seen. Surely it must be some type of a warning to us all that he is under some type of duress. That is my only guess.
At any rate, there are very real reasons why he would succumb to duress but I cannot speak of those as I would be breaking my word and I do not ever break my word, no matter what.
I don't see any reasons to "distance myself from" Eric Hunt, while I do not endorse his change of position in any way. Distancing is something that cucks or naughty children do. Mature people acknowledge differences and live with them.
I sense that there is somewhat duress on Eric and hinted to what I imagine it is. However I take him at his words in the essay and think we should pick up the challenge, which I think is mostly arguments we already dealt with. I listed that above. Given all the research and trickery Eric Hunt has exposed in the past, he should actually know better anyway.
It's kind of funny Mr Hunt decided to post this on "Holocaust Memorial Day", which falls on the so-called "liberation of Auschwitz" (The camp was used further by the Communists). It's always as if he tried to say something with that. What point could a Revisionist make with presenting a "Holocaust lite" version on that day? I have an idea, but would like to refrain from that now, but think strategically about the cultural field for a while - It's almost perfectly polarized between the Orthodox and the "Deniers", with some pseudo debate between Intentionalists and Functionalist in the Exterminationist camp. Remember the Exterminationists refuse any debate with Revisionists, for obvious reasons. Their evidence isn't that strong and lot of the circumstantial stuff they got more sound evidence for, is actually perfectly in line with general Revisionist positions.