Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
Yes, the “Old Eric Hunt” demonstrates that he had critical thinking ability, while this “New Eric Hunt” shows a distinct lack of it, what with the mish-mash of items he lists as causing him to renounce the revisionist position. His focus is on relatively side issues, for example, what happened to young and old jews, etc. Yet we know when the Soviets arrived at Auschwitz there where many old, young and sick there.
In Jurgen Graf’s new book, “White World Awake” he writes:
“On Jan. 27, 1945 the Red Army liberated the Auschwitz concentration camp. The SS had left shortly before and had evacuated the prisoners to the west. About 4,299 inmates, mainly Jewish, remained behind, because they could not be evacuated: the sick, invalid, children and old people. Accompanying the Soviet army was a contingent of war correspondents, who immediately began the task of inspecting the camp and interviewing those inmates who had been left behind.
... After having killed a million, it would not have mattered to also kill another 4,299 victims. Second, the so called “facts” contradict the official historical account that sick Jews, invalids, children and old people actually survived. According to the mass media version of events, it was these who, upon arrival at the camp, were immediately gassed and were not even registered. Establishment historians claim that Jewish prisoners who became sick were killed immediately either by gas, or injection. Most of the preserved documentation about Auschwitz places such claims in the sphere of fables.”
The core of “Holocaust” revisionism is that the Holocaust believers’ three main beliefs are FALSE, i.e., that the German’s had a genocidal plan to exterminate the jews, that homicidal gas chambers were used to kill many to most of them, and that 6,000,000 were exterminated.
The “New Eric Hunt” doesn’t, or hasn’t yet, addressed these three main beliefs.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: MSN [Bot], rene and 12 guests