Some people can never admit to being wrong.
Of course, the obvious question is: 'Why do so many people want 6M Jews to be dead?
One would think that Jews especially would be elated to hear that '6M' of their brethren were not murdered.
But well, here we are. "There's no business like 'shoah' business."
Reminder, all Revisionists are former Believers who simply grew up.
Search this forum: Muehlenkamp Sobibor for much more.
You will see his evasion / dodging of challenge after challenge made by Forum participants.
Of course the same can be said of Roberto and all the absurdly alleged "death camps".
Muehlenkamp and those like him make claims that the remains of 250,000 allegedly 'murdered' Jews are still at Sobibor, but cannot show us those claimed human remains when challenged repeatedly. That by itself is damning, if not simply embarrassing.
Imagine, he / they claim massive human remains still exist and then are not able to actually show us those remains when challenged.
Two guys with shovels and a camera would be all that anyone needed.
But alas, it's all a big bluff. The 'holocaust' fraud is the quintessential 'Big Lie'.
Here we see Muehlenkamp debunked by Revisionist scholar, Thomas Kues. Kues puts to good use Nuremberg document NO-482 in
demonstrating that Sobibor was a transit camp, certainly not the laughable "death camp" as alleged by profit minded Zionists.
A must read here for those desire truth in history.
Lies and obfuscations about Himmler's Sobibor directive
By Thomas Kues
To summarize: On 5 July 1943 Himmler ordered that the "Sobibór transit camp" was to be converted into a concentration camp equipped with a dismantling unit for captured enemy munitions. On 15 July Pohl on behalf of himself and Globocnik wrote to Himmler, recommending that said conversion be abandoned, as the installation of the dismantling unit could be achieved without it. Finally on 24 July Brandt wrote and confirmed that Himmler agreed with the proposal.
It is clear as day from even a cursory glance at these letters that Pohl and Globocnik did not "convince" Himmler "to make Sobibor into a 'transit camp'". In fact it was the other way around: the camp was designated a transit camp (Durchgangslager) at the time Himmler wrote his directive.
The presence of 600-700 Jewish inmates in Sobibór fits perfectly well with the transit camp hypothesis, as there was certainly enough work for them all of them to carry out. Roberto Muehlenkamp's "argument" regarding the letters of NO-482 is therefore devoid of any value: the number of inmates at Sobibór throws no doubt on Himmler's, Pohl's and Brandt's designation of Sobibór as a "transit camp" (Durchgangslager). Their use of that designation is fully congruent with the state of evidence, which allows for only one conclusion: that Sobibór indeed was a transit camp. There is a good reason why Black, Arad, Hilberg and Muehlenkamp have felt compelled to meet the contents of NO-482 with lies and obfuscations.
Before he bothered to write this helplessly flawed criticism Mr. Muehlenkamp should moreover have recalled a truism well-known to all those knowledgable about the socio-economics and technologies of Ancient Rome and Egypt: When slave labor is available in (virtually) unlimited amounts, efficient utilization of said manpower is not a pressing issue.
"Alone the fact that one may not question the Jewish "holocaust" and that Jewish pressure has inflicted laws on democratic societies to prevent questions—while incessant promotion and indoctrination of the same averredly incontestable ‘holocaust’ occur—gives the game away. It proves that it must be a lie. Why else would one not be allowed to question it? Because it might offend the "survivors"? Because it "dishonors the dead"? Hardly sufficient reason to outlaw discussion. No, because the exposure of this leading lie might precipitate questions about so many other lies and cause the whole ramshackle fabrication to crumble."
- Gerard Menuhin / righteous Revisionist Jew, son of famous violinist