While it seems you prefer go after Hannover in a personal way, it is not furthering the debate here. In fact you seem to avoid specifics and go around in circles. These useless posts get deleted. Please note that there are many Revisionist posts which have been deleted for the same reason, that's a fact.
A few points that you make need clarification. I am not a Hannover.
Your reference to Andrew Mathis and Roberto, are uninformed and factually incorrect. Have a look at threads here in which they participated and see the results, the record speaks for itself. I notice that you have avoided posting any views which would lend support to their positions. To claim 'foul' when the opportunity is there to respond is at best, insincere.
And you are going to tell me that Hannover is not allowed to dodge a question when it does not suit his purpose?
This thread started with a quote from Jackson, one, when taken out of context seems to be ridiculous in the extreme.
However, when the text is taken in context, it is plannly evident that Jackson was seeking information concerning Nazi secret weapon programs. The preceeding and follow-up questions demonstrate this for any knowledgeable person to see.
Then, when I post a rebuttal, rather than my post appearing, Hannover mysteriously reaffirms and clarifies his statement. Yeah, that's just a coincidence.
Besides Hannover made the statement ... "The Germans did not create the cited document which Justice Jackson presented and you can present no evidence to show they did." ... now, if I made that statement, I would be asked to demonstrate how and why it was not made by the Germans.
I asked Hannover to support his statement, his reply was a dodge ... it was a dodge, I would not be allowed to get away with it, he should not!!
C'mon, have the nerve to post this, then have the nerve to demand that Hannover respond!!