VIDEO classic: Auschwitz Aerial photos, tampered with to fit the fake story / by John Ball

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 9524
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

VIDEO classic: Auschwitz Aerial photos, tampered with to fit the fake story / by John Ball

Postby Hannover » 6 months 1 week ago (Fri Mar 09, 2018 1:03 pm)

We've talked about this aplenty, so now see a walk-through by John Ball of the very obvious, desperate actions.

Have a look.
See additional info. / links that follow below.

- Hannover

Revisionists are just the messengers, the absurd impossibility of the 'holocaust' storyline is the message.

https://codoh.com/library/document/5390/?lang=en
Memorabilia: Examination of the Air Photo Evidence of Auschwitz featuring John Ball
By John Clive Ball

John Ball examines the air photos of Auschwitz and how they have been tampered with to fit the Holocaust narrative.



See more below, such as:

Drawn in 'Jews being marched to gas chambers', on a roof.
Image
and:
'Critique of Claims Made by Robert Jan Van Pelt'
http://www.vho.org/GB/c/GR/RudolfOnVanPelt.html
and:
'Altered Aerial Photos and the Shadows of Doom'
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=3249
and:
Air Photo Evidence
https://archive.org/details/AirPhotoEvidenceAuschwitz


If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

avatar
Elroy
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 179
Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2017 7:15 pm

Re: VIDEO classic: Auschwitz Aerial photos, tampered with to fit the fake story / by John Ball

Postby Elroy » 6 months 1 week ago (Fri Mar 09, 2018 8:15 pm)

Excellent presentation:

No doubt about it, CIA obtained images and drew in columns of Jews and holes in roof of crema- and got busted badly.

When you deliver the proof to somebody- they cannot accept it.

No holes in the roof proves beyond any possible doubt that the whole gas chamber lie is fake- physically impossible.

The response is either fact denial or icy silence and diversion.

User avatar
rev82
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2018 9:30 am

Re: VIDEO classic: Auschwitz Aerial photos, tampered with to fit the fake story / by John Ball

Postby rev82 » 6 months 1 week ago (Sun Mar 11, 2018 7:28 am)

Hello; unlike the basic chemistry explaining how hcn works and basic notions on the cremation process
( ie Lagace's video ) which I think are accessible to everyone this is a very specialized and specific field although the tampering is quite significant.
I'm downloading the pdf version from archive anyway
Why so many CODOH videos are blocked in the UK?

User avatar
Hektor
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 3151
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 7:59 am

Re: VIDEO classic: Auschwitz Aerial photos, tampered with to fit the fake story / by John Ball

Postby Hektor » 6 months 1 week ago (Sun Mar 11, 2018 10:06 am)

rev82 wrote:Hello; unlike the basic chemistry explaining how hcn works and basic notions on the cremation process
( ie Lagace's video ) which I think are accessible to everyone this is a very specialized and specific field although the tampering is quite significant.
I'm downloading the pdf version from archive anyway
Why so many CODOH videos are blocked in the UK?


The reason given is that it is "hate speech". Which is quite rich, since it's the holocaust promotion materials that spread hate.
The real reason is that there is a lot of vested interest in the Holocaust Narrative, so people can't be allowed questioning it.
Why the interest? Because the Holocaust is what makes the Nazi baton stick against anybody that defends his nation in some way.
There is of course other interest of a financial or political nature as well.

There is also a lot of videos that can be downloaded from the archive site. So when Youtube blocks it go to archive.org.

avatar
Carto's Cutlass Supreme
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2321
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 1:42 am
Location: Northern California

Re: VIDEO classic: Auschwitz Aerial photos, tampered with to fit the fake story / by John Ball

Postby Carto's Cutlass Supreme » 6 months 1 week ago (Mon Mar 12, 2018 4:10 am)

I had no idea that he ever was videotaped giving a talk. Wow.

User avatar
Kingfisher
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 1669
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 4:55 pm

Re: VIDEO classic: Auschwitz Aerial photos, tampered with to fit the fake story / by John Ball

Postby Kingfisher » 6 months 1 week ago (Mon Mar 12, 2018 9:01 am)

Those odd marks don't look a bit like groups of people, in addition to being on the roof, so I don't think they can have been drawn in. If they had, whoever did it would certainly have made a better job of it. They look like some kind of handling artefact, which was then, either deliberately or from confirmation bias, mislabeled by the CIA. Impossible to be certain, but that's the impression I get.

Denierbud has pointed out how the CIA inherited personnel from the wartime OSS, and this could be significant. Even though the same persons might not be there by 1979, they would have influenced the culture, and anyway, at that time no one doubted the Holocaust story.

User avatar
Hektor
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 3151
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 7:59 am

Re: VIDEO classic: Auschwitz Aerial photos, tampered with to fit the fake story / by John Ball

Postby Hektor » 6 months 1 week ago (Mon Mar 12, 2018 9:36 am)

Kingfisher wrote:Those odd marks don't look a bit like groups of people, in addition to being on the roof, so I don't think they can have been drawn in. If they had, whoever did it would certainly have made a better job of it. They look like some kind of handling artefact, which was then, either deliberately or from confirmation bias, mislabeled by the CIA. Impossible to be certain, but that's the impression I get.

Denierbud has pointed out how the CIA inherited personnel from the wartime OSS, and this could be significant. Even though the same persons might not be there by 1979, they would have influenced the culture, and anyway, at that time no one doubted the Holocaust story.

They got clear confirmation bias in their work. But my guess is that the forgers and interpreters would still be two different people. The interpreter, would indeed believe that what he saw on the pictures are traces of some homicidal gassing program. That'll make him sound more credible.
It's anyway the mode of operation of the Holocaust industry to make use of proxies that were made to believe in an (1)extermination program, (2) that involved homicidal gas chambers, (3) achieved to kill six million Jews. The initial story tellers would quickly become suspect, since with some of the "witnesses" or rather narrators, you can hear from their voice and see from their gesticulation that they are habitual liars.

Here is a photo:
Image

The Zyklon B hatches are asymmetrical and definitely look drawn in. But with confirmation bias that may even be overlooked by an expert interpreter. Even if you assume that those were marks from real objects, it can not be assumed out of hand, that those are hatches. They could be shadows or coloring from other objects like boxes with building materials, even people standing on the roofs for some reasons.


A good interpreter would have pointed out all those possibilities and assigned probabilities to each possibility. They didn't do that, but jumped to conclusions. It's the "convergence of evidence" ploy gone wrong. Essentially it is bad conjecture. Because none on the Holocaustian side of the argument ever deals with the role of psychological warfare and spreading of rumors to sabotage and smear the enemy during war time. They make as if this didn't really happen at all. The problem for them is that the Allies actually were documenting doing exactly that.


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests