More hot Revisionst debates at / Join In

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
User avatar
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 9691
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

More hot Revisionst debates at / Join In

Postby Hannover » 9 months 2 weeks ago (Mon Jun 04, 2018 11:13 pm)

Kudos to Ron Unz and his

red hot threads:

Introduction to HITLER'S WAR

Tons of Revisionist posts. Self appointed "Holocaust Industry" spokesman Andrew Mathis taking another serious beating by many in-the-know participants.

Awareness of Revisionist research & efforts is increasing rapidly.

American Pravda: When Stalin Almost Conquered Europe / by Ron Unz ... ed-europe/

Lot's more than just recognition of Stalin's plan to attack Germany.

Have at it.

- Hannover

Revisionists are just the messengers, the absurd impossibility of the ridiculous 'holocaust' storyline is the message.
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 722
Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 5:39 pm
Location: Europa

Re: More hot Revisionst debates at / Join In

Postby Breker » 9 months 2 weeks ago (Tue Jun 05, 2018 1:38 am)

We did check those links out and Mr. Andrew Mathis is certainly taken to the old woodshed by numerous individuals. His blundering posts are classic and laid bare for all to see. We're quite sure he regrets that his posts that will always be there for all to see. Refer to them as you wish.
There are quite a few pure revisionist set backs for Mathis while his nefarious activities are also highlighted, but there is one which emphasizes with gusto the low life manner in which Mr. Mathis conducts himself.

In this thread, have a look at post number 133 by a gentlemen name Renfro.
He posted a previous back and forth exchange between Mr. Mathis and a Ms. Lee: ... /#comments

Renfro posted the text of this link with his comments.

As usual it ends quite poorly for Mr. Mathis as Ms Lee backhands him with facts.

In ending, Ms. Lee said to the shamefully discredited Mr. Mathis:
FURTHERMORE….you are not a member of some world wide group and your web site is defunct , your ‘ holocaust foundation’ consist of 8 other nutcase Jews. You are only a’ adjunct’ Professor hired to teach one holocaust course and you are not a member of the Villanova faculty.
In short you are a nobody loser Jew using the holocaust to try and make yourself somebody and get attention and since being a Jew is all you’ve got in your sicko life the only club you have to attacker your betters is the ‘denier’ and’ anti semite’ hurl.
Holocaust History Project is defunct and and ... ry_Project

I think you need a lesson in manners…there’s a lot of your libelous, threatening and profane crap out on the net…lets send it to Villanova and see if they cant find a better adjunct’ than you.
Revisionists are just the messengers, the impossibility of the "Holocaust" narrative is the message.

User avatar
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2385
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 5:52 am
Location: Europe

Re: More hot Revisionst debates at / Join In

Postby borjastick » 9 months 2 weeks ago (Tue Jun 05, 2018 4:03 am)

Indeed Breker I was reading a few odd and sods there on that thread and noticed one of the Mathis Phd comments about the veracity and strength of witnesses to the holocaust story. He seemed to be saying that there are always witness accounts in every major event in history and as such those for the holocaust are just as valid as any other.

What he omits to say is that the holocaust is unlike any other event in history because it relies almost entirely on witness statements and little else, certainly there is no overwhelming support in evidence and science for the story. Whereas in other events witness statements form part of the overall understanding of what might or might not have happened but they are supported by many more levels of evidence about which there is great belief, unlike the holocaust.

Witness statements regarding the holocaust are full of mystery and belief that something must have happened and thus 'my views because I was there are valid and verify it all'.

Take for example the rumours that were swirling around the camps at the time that people were being gassed etc. These would have spread like wildfire and then when Uncle Goldstein never sees his family again he automatically connects non existent dots to believe the story. In actual fact his family were segregated by gender and age and then had their heads shaved and given a uniform. No one would recognise aunt Golda after that. Plus these people were assigned jobs in the massive 40sq km camp at Auschwitz or elsewhere in the camp system.

Mathis ties himself in knots yet again.
'Of the four million Jews under Nazi control in WW2, six million died and alas only five million survived.'

'We don't need evidence, we have survivors' - israeli politician

Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests