Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
red hot threads:
Introduction to HITLER'S WAR
Tons of Revisionist posts. Self appointed "Holocaust Industry" spokesman Andrew Mathis taking another serious beating by many in-the-know participants.
Awareness of Revisionist research & efforts is increasing rapidly.
American Pravda: When Stalin Almost Conquered Europe / by Ron Unz
http://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda ... ed-europe/
Lot's more than just recognition of Stalin's plan to attack Germany.
Have at it.
Revisionists are just the messengers, the absurd impossibility of the ridiculous 'holocaust' storyline is the message.
There are quite a few pure revisionist set backs for Mathis while his nefarious activities are also highlighted, but there is one which emphasizes with gusto the low life manner in which Mr. Mathis conducts himself.
In this thread, have a look at post number 133 by a gentlemen name Renfro.
He posted a previous back and forth exchange between Mr. Mathis and a Ms. Lee:
http://www.unz.com/article/introduction ... /#comments
Renfro posted the text of this link with his comments.
As usual it ends quite poorly for Mr. Mathis as Ms Lee backhands him with facts.
In ending, Ms. Lee said to the shamefully discredited Mr. Mathis:
B.FURTHERMORE….you are not a member of some world wide group and your web site is defunct , your ‘ holocaust foundation’ consist of 8 other nutcase Jews. You are only a’ adjunct’ Professor hired to teach one holocaust course and you are not a member of the Villanova faculty.
In short you are a nobody loser Jew using the holocaust to try and make yourself somebody and get attention and since being a Jew is all you’ve got in your sicko life the only club you have to attacker your betters is the ‘denier’ and’ anti semite’ hurl.
Holocaust History Project is defunct http://www.spitecast.com/aemathisphd/ and http://phdn.org/archives/holocaust-history.org/ and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Holoc ... ry_Project
I think you need a lesson in manners…there’s a lot of your libelous, threatening and profane crap out on the net…lets send it to Villanova and see if they cant find a better adjunct’ than you.
What he omits to say is that the holocaust is unlike any other event in history because it relies almost entirely on witness statements and little else, certainly there is no overwhelming support in evidence and science for the story. Whereas in other events witness statements form part of the overall understanding of what might or might not have happened but they are supported by many more levels of evidence about which there is great belief, unlike the holocaust.
Witness statements regarding the holocaust are full of mystery and belief that something must have happened and thus 'my views because I was there are valid and verify it all'.
Take for example the rumours that were swirling around the camps at the time that people were being gassed etc. These would have spread like wildfire and then when Uncle Goldstein never sees his family again he automatically connects non existent dots to believe the story. In actual fact his family were segregated by gender and age and then had their heads shaved and given a uniform. No one would recognise aunt Golda after that. Plus these people were assigned jobs in the massive 40sq km camp at Auschwitz or elsewhere in the camp system.
Mathis ties himself in knots yet again.
'We don't need evidence, we have survivors' - israeli politician
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], borjastick and 18 guests