Originally posted on "History Uncovered"
[History Uncovered is a "liar run" holocaust promotion fronting as a "history" site.]
''Dr. Josef Mengele told me that it was my duty to report every pregnant woman to him. I decided that never again would there be a pregnant woman in Auschwitz.''
Caption: "The Incredible true story of Gisela Perl- the Angel of Auschwitz"
Article here: https://allthatsinteresting.com/gisella-perl
Post and discussion of interest here:
https://www.facebook.com/HistoryUncover ... ment_reply
My only concern with the text of this caption is the word "True"...
It seems strange that that word would have to be included in the caption [thinking face]
Or maybe it isn't so strange...
For any scholarly types about this forum, I'll just leave a copy of this here
The ensuing battle is a typical example of how scouts use their hierarchy of "tools" to prevent the spread of truthful information.
And examination of the larger thread reveals the total meaningless dialogue between whether it was "right" for her to abort the children or let the evil Mengele murder them. When the woman's story is established as a propaganda lie and the Mengele myth evaporated altogether- it doesn't make any sense the discussion.
The summary of the thread in question is reproduced here...
SUMMARY: I put up a book for people to review on the topic if they wanted to, offered no conclusion of my own, made no instructive comment. The book is apolitical, purely scientific and academic in perfect form, free from any prejudice or bias.
Without any encouragement was in succession bombarded by the following...
1. Derogatory insult
2. Assault on character and intelligence
3. Straw manning
4. Attempts to force a censor through threats of violence
5. Attempts to force a self censor.
6. False inferencing on the political, prejudicial, character and honesty of the author
7. Ad homenim attack on the author.
^If the above views were valid, they'd be validated if the book was read. That could be the reason why it was necessary to use such tact because as I allege there is "another" reason.
Nowhere in the lengthy list of comments was there any attempt whatsoever to address the "content" of the book. Clearly because those above did not want you to know the content of the book.
^The scholars whom this post was specifically addressed to, will understand.