Like the vast majority here, I was brought up in the post-war era and probably a bit nearer to that era than most. In my youth there were newspapers, radio and the cinema. Generally anything outside the media remained gossip and largely ignored.
What this produced was a belief based society in which government propaganda became truth, but facts were ignored and turned into conspiracy theories. Today, despite the plethora of Internet information, we regress back to the age of beliefs as America recently wheeled out Obama as a Messiah and a new generation of survivors of survivors queue for their share of entitlement compensation handouts.
Historical revisionism now gets a bad press, yet is it wrong for science to provide facts, which previously were based on beliefs? Isn’t the purpose of historians to delve into the truth behind the beliefs of bygone eras? If we’re to learn from history, what will we learn from the propaganda behind
My revisionism didn’t happen with a bang because of something I’d read, but over a period of time as I began to question my beliefs. How do you kill six million people and the rest of the population remain blissfully unaware of it? Why would death camp inmates be disinfected, tattooed, clothed, fed first and then killed? Why would the Hollywood makers of "Schindler’s List", which reads like a Tel Aviv phone directory, try to present it as fact when the book on which it was based, "Shindler’s Ark", won the Booker Prize for fiction in 1982? Were the skeletal remains found in liberated camps the work of an extermination policy, or the effects of Typhus and typhoid epidemics at the war’s end as the supply lines were cut? Questions, questions.
There remains no doubt that the Jews suffered during the war, lost families, died en masse, yet so did every other race and nationality.
The figures at Auschwitz magically drop from four million to one and a half million after Polish independence enabled scientific inquiry and the ‘survivors’ who hadn’t contacted typhus or typhoid give thanks that Auschwitz was a slave labour camp and not an genocidal extermination center.
The war wasn’t about Jews, or genocide, it was about Germany throwing out the Jewish International financiers and abandoning usury. The Jews were simply presented as the victims to prevent it happening again. Other countries who recently tried to break the Jewish financial stranglehold, Iraq, Libya and Syria also suffered the same fate. As Churchill later said:
"Germany’s unforgivable crime before WW2 was its attempt to loosen its economy out of the world trade system and to build up an independent exchange system from which the world-finance couldn’t profit anymore. …We butchered the wrong pig." - Winston Churchill (The Second World War – Bern, 1960)
Churchill won, yet he lost an Empire and as predicted long ago, the west entered into an age of Jewish cultural Marxism that destroyed western civilization from which it will be near impossible to recover from.
"Humanity would sink into eternal darkness, it would fall into a dull and primitive state, were the Jews to win this war." - Dr Joseph Goebbels.