'The Matrix of Converging Evidence' / the true convergence supports the Revisionist side

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
User avatar
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 9689
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

'The Matrix of Converging Evidence' / the true convergence supports the Revisionist side

Postby Hannover » 1 month 2 weeks ago (Mon Jan 28, 2019 11:52 am)

The old canard, 'convergence of evidence', which is claimed as proof of the impossible '6,000,000 Jews, 5,000,000 others & gas chambers' is simply a bluff.
Here we have a quick, to-the-point take down of that element of The Big Lie.

- Hannover

No human remains of millions in allegedly known locations, no 'holocaust'.

The Matrix of Converging Evidence
By Panagiotis Heliotis

One of the trump cards the Holocaust historians and promoters like to use is what they call the “convergence of evidence”. All available evidence they tell us, either testimonies, photos, documents, or anything, point to one single conclusion: The Holocaust as we know it.

Unfortunately, this is nothing but an illusion – in other words, a Matrix, as portrayed in the 1999 science-fiction film of that name. In order to make this clear we will pick five members of the Sonderkommando (Filip Muller, Henryk Tauber, Shlomo Venezia, Marcel Nadjari, Leon Cohen), as they are the most important eyewitnesses, and ask them 10 simple questions. Then we will see if their statements, as they appear in their respective memoirs, actually “converge.” All the questions are on essential points and not on some minor details. So their convergence or divergence is of the utmost importance for the official story. Are you ready to take the Red Pill (a choice against the Blue Pill, to prolong the illusions, featured in the above-mentioned movie)? Here we go.

Question #1: Where was the gas chamber?

• In a fake shower room (Muller, Tauber, Nadjari, Venezia).

• In a room next to the fake shower room (Cohen).

Question #2: How many holes were there on the roof?

• One (Nadjari, Venezia).

• One every 8 meters (Cohen).

• Four (Tauber).

Question #3: How was the gas inserted?

• Directly (Nadjari, Venezia).

• Through pillars made of sheet metal (Muller).

• Through pillars covered with pierced metal plates (Cohen).

• Through pillars made of three layers of iron mesh (Tauber).

Question #4: How many people could you fit into the chamber?

• 750 (Cohen).

• 2,500 (Nadjari).

• 3,000 (Muller).

Question #5: After throwing in the gas how long did you wait before opening the door?

• A few minutes (Muller).

• 10-12 minutes (Venezia).

• One hour (Nadjari).

• Two hours (Tauber, Cohen).

Question #6: When did you start on the ventilation?

• Before opening the door (Muller, Tauber, Nadjari).

• After opening the door (Venezia, Cohen).

Question #7: How long was the ventilation on?

• A few minutes (Muller).

• 20 minutes (Venezia).

• Two hours (Cohen).

Question #8: Did you notice any unusual color on the corpses?

• No (Nadjari).

• Many had turned blue (Muller).

• Some were red, some were pale (Venezia).

• Pinkish, some were covered with green marks (Tauber).

• Black near the columns, pink away from them (Cohen).

Question #9: Did you wear gas masks while working in the chamber?

• Yes (Muller, Tauber).

• No (Venezia).

Question #10: How many corpses could you cremate in 24 hours?

• 1,800 (Venezia).

• 2,500 (Nadjari, Tauber).

• 3,000 (Muller).

• 3,600 (Cohen).

So there you have it. Remember that all of this is supposed to be firsthand information from people who worked at the exact same installations during the same time period. But as any magician will tell you, for the illusion to work you need to always distract the audience. And that’s what the Holocaust historians do. They never give you the complete picture. Because they fear that once you see it, the spell will be broken and you will never go back.

So what will it be Dear Reader? It takes courage, it takes determination, but if you choose the Red Pill, welcome to the real world. Including the real Holocaust—what of it was real, anyway.
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

User avatar
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 424
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:32 pm

Re: 'The Matrix of Converging Evidence' / the true convergence supports the Revisionist side

Postby Lamprecht » 1 month 2 weeks ago (Mon Jan 28, 2019 12:53 pm)

Auschwitz gas chamber testimonies are extraordinarily rare. Fewer than 5% of testimonies at Birkenau mention homicidal gas chambers at all. I show this in my post here:


Believers will sometimes ask, when you claim the gas chambers are a hoax, "So, what, did all of the witnesses lie about it then? They just made it up?"

No, not all of them, but apparently 3-4% of them did. Is that so hard to believe, that fewer than 5% of the relevant eyewitness testimonies have fabricated the gas chambers?

Ultimately, the hoaxters cherry-pick testimonies that "fit" with their ridiculous gas chamber narrative. Evidently, these testimonies don't even agree with each other.
"There is a principal which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance -- that principal is contempt prior to investigation."
-- Herbert Spencer

Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider] and 2 guests