Best and worst / least successful arguments

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
Posts: 47
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2019 11:37 am

Re: Best and worst / least successful arguments

Postby forasanerworld » 4 months 3 days ago (Tue Jun 11, 2019 12:43 pm)

If the Auschwitz death number was 4,000,000 subsequently reduced to 1,000,000 why did Rudolph Hoess "admit to 2 million gassed an 500,ooo killed by other means"?

Could that have anything to do with the gentle reminding exercise he was subjected to by the British Army Jewish Brigade who apprehended him and took some three days to arrive with him at the interrogation centre where the entertainment was continued?

Posts: 47
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2019 11:37 am

Re: Best and worst / least successful arguments

Postby forasanerworld » 4 months 3 days ago (Tue Jun 11, 2019 1:11 pm)

Prompted by the David Cole video post here (video link is "404 Not Found", can anyone post a link?) I found this:

In short, a holocaust survivor thought his brother was dead, his brother, also a holocaust survivor also thought HIS brother to be dead; how many "missing in incarceration presumed dead" but actually alive are there?

User avatar
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 9864
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Re: Best and worst / least successful arguments

Postby Hannover » 4 months 2 days ago (Tue Jun 11, 2019 5:27 pm)

forasanerworld wrote:The standard narrative has it that hundreds of thousands were gassed on arrival while others, evidently unable to work, were put on starvation level rations, photographs there of abound.

The human body can persist quite a long time with no food whatever.

If there really was an intent on mass murder why were those penned at e.g Birkenau simply denied water, Zyclon-B and critical rations saved and three to eight days later everyone would be dead.

Such tactics were of course employed by the US in the Rhine Meadow camps

- Why would they starve those that they needed for labor?
- Why were so many send OUT of Auschwitz if it was an "extermination camp".

- Healthy Jews at Auschwitz 'liberation':

Revealing video about children in the Germans camps, who according to The Big Lie 'were murdered because they could not work.'
See both Jew and Gentile children, see actual Hanukah ceremonies in the "death camps".
'What happened to children in the German concentration camps':

"extermination camp / death camp" Auschwitz:

- An "extermination camp" where thousands of Jews <b>chose</b> to stay behind when the Germans left.
- An "extermination camp" where most of the inmates, more thousands, <b>chose</b> to leave WITH the Germans.
- An "extermination camp" where 1,250,000 human remains are supposedly buried, but no one can show us these remains.
- An "extermination camp" where many Jews gave birth.
- An "extermination camp" where the absurdly alleged homicidal 'gas chambers' could not have worked as alleged, as proven repeatedly, scientifically impossible.
- An "extermination camp" where fake 'gas chambers' were "reconstructed" AFTER THE WAR.
- An "extermination camp" where detailed aerial photos of the period show nothing that is alleged to have been happening.
- An "extermination camp" where there are even obvious, laughable attempts to tamper with aerial photos that make a mockery of the fake storyline.
Auschwitz Aerial photos, tampered with to fit the fake story:
- An "extermination camp" where there are countless Jew "survivors", yet the fake narrative says 'the Germans tried to kill every Jew they could get their hands on.'
-An "extermination camp" where so called "survivors" say the most impossible and conflicting things that do not hold up to scrutiny, would be laughed out of a legit court of law.

- Hannover

Only lies require censorship.
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

Posts: 47
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2019 11:37 am

Re: Best and worst / least successful arguments

Postby forasanerworld » 3 months 4 weeks ago (Sun Jun 16, 2019 2:20 pm)

The named individuals at 21.45 in the YT film, has any attempt been made to locate any of them, even if now deceased?

User avatar
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 1165
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:32 pm

Re: Best and worst / least successful arguments

Postby Lamprecht » 2 months 2 weeks ago (Fri Jul 26, 2019 5:59 pm)

Quite a compelling argument, I'd say:

Germans destroyed the crematoria, but left "Gas Chambers" intact
Lamprecht wrote:- At Majdanek, the crematorium building was destroyed, but not the alleged "Homicidal gas chamber" - Why? Revisionists claim that these rooms were delousing chambers, where Zyclon-B (a pesticide) was used to fumigate clothing

- Similarly, at Stutthof, the "Homicidal gas chamber" was left intact whereas the crematoria were destroyed

- At Auschwitz/Birkenau, the crematorium facilities were dismantled, but the main camp "homicidal gas chamber" rooms at Krema 1 and Block 11 were 100% intact when the Soviets 'liberated' the camp in January 1945

- From Andrew Allen's article below: "The two most important gas chambers of the entire Holocaust Myth are Leichenkeller 1 of Krema II and Leichenkeller 1 of Krema III. Leichenkeller 1 of Krema II was/is almost entirely complete, with its floor and walls untouched. The roof consisting of two layers of waterproofing and a thick concrete slab roof have partially fallen into the room below. About 35% of the room is still easily accessible. Leichenkeller 1 of Krema III was also left in a highly "inspectable" state, but with its roof completely dropped."

- How many "Sonderkommando" were supposedly forced to take care of these gassed corpses, but miraculously the Germans forgot to kill them?

Suggested reading:

Why the Germans Destroyed the Crematoria but left the Gas Chambers Intact

Auschwitz, Destruction of Crematories

Why did Germans dynamite "Gas chambers"???

David Cole: Forty-Six Important Unanswered Questions Regarding the Nazi Gas Chambers

Germar Rudolf: The Rudolf Report - Expert Report on Chemical and Technical Aspects of the ‘Gas Chambers’ of Auschwitz

Stutthof as an "Extermination Camp": Critical Investigation of the Sources

Let me guess, they just forgot? :lol:
"There is a principal which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance -- that principal is contempt prior to investigation."
-- Herbert Spencer

Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: MSN [Bot] and 9 guests