The ADL Reviews the Institute for Historical Review

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
User avatar
JLAD Prove Me Wrong
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 335
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2018 8:35 pm

The ADL Reviews the Institute for Historical Review

Postby JLAD Prove Me Wrong » 6 months 3 days ago (Thu May 09, 2019 11:16 pm)

This is dated, but quite an interesting insight on how the ADL viewed/views holocaust revisionists (from 2002), and how the IHR was doing at the time. Certainly at this time, the IHR was going down a cliff, and really has never recovered since. Read on.

https://web.archive.org/web/20030830042 ... 3&item=ihr

Founding and Early Years
The Institute of Historical Review and its publishing arm, the Noontide Press, were founded in 1978 by the leading organizer of modern American anti-Semitism, Willis Carto, and his wife Elisabeth. Based near Los Angeles in Torrance, California, the group pioneered organizing efforts among Holocaust deniers, who had heretofore labored mostly in isolation and obscurity. The group's first "Revisionist Convention" in September 1979 featured speakers from the U.S., France, Germany, England and Sweden, many of whom subsequently contributed articles to the inaugural issue of IHR's Journal of Historical Review the following spring. With the Noontide Press offering a means for the sale and distribution of their writings, professional deniers had found something of a rainmaker in Carto.

In a misguided bid to enlist mainstream historians to its cause, IHR obtained the 12,000-member mailing list of the Organization of American Historians, to which it sent copies of the Journal of Historical Review. The group also sent mailings to members of the American Historical Association and to subscribers of the scholarly journals Central European History and German Quarterly. Unsurprisingly, these efforts backfired: all of the organizations and journals repudiated IHR and promised to keep the group away from their mailing lists in the future. The Organization of American Historians went further, commissioning a study of IHR's materials. The results were damning, with a panel finding that the Journal of Historical Review was "nothing but a masquerade of scholarship." [See box: "OAH Responds"]

OAH Responds
"The Executive Secretary obtained analyses of the Journal of Historical Review from several well-trained scholars.…Defining the Journal as 'nothing but a masquerade of scholarship,' 'pseudo-scholarly,' and 'not a serious academic publication,' the scholars…. point out that the authors make highly selective use of the data, picking out of context every bit that might support their preconceived notions....[they] also build their arguments on the flimsiest of evidence and even create evidence when necessary. They use obsolete material or rumors, often in line with Nazi ideology and propaganda, much of it anti-Semitic….

"[One] historian observes, 'the topic and aim…is…to arouse or nourish doubts about the nature and dimensions of the Nazi atrocities, and to deny or apologize for the facts and meaning of the "Holocaust"'….[A]nother analyst charges that the authors tamper with or distort history for ideological purposes, seeking to diminish what for Jews has become a sacred symbol and hoping to rehabilitate and make legitimate the wartime Nazi movement."

-- Organization of American Historians Newsletter vol. 9 no. 1, January 1981



The Ideology of Holocaust Denial
The core of IHR's mission was (and remains) propagating the contention that the Holocaust, in which approximately six million European Jews were murdered, many by poison gas, by the Nazi regime during World War II, did not occur. IHR strenuously objects to the term "Holocaust denial," and its staff and contributors cast themselves as legitimate historians engaged in revising and reevaluating historical events. But the consistent thrust of its "research," its espousal of lies, half-truths and methodologically flawed arguments demonstrates that, far from dispassionately revisiting the historical evidence, it aims to deny that what has become known as the Holocaust ever occurred.

To this end IHR and its associates seek to erode the underpinnings of what they call the "Holocaust story." From the institute's inception, speakers at its conferences and writers in its journal or published by its press have labored to build a case that the Auschwitz gas chambers were either used only for delousing clothing or were merely bomb shelters; that the confessions of SS personnel, including Adolf Eichmann and Rudolf Höss, must be disregarded; that there was no policy of murdering Jews in places such as Treblinka, Majdanek and Belzec. IHR continually works to discredit the testimony of survivors and the reliability of wartime documents; several articles and speeches have been devoted to proving that Anne Frank's diary is a "fraud" fabricated after the war. One article has even suggested that the infamous German pogrom known as Kristallnacht was directed by the Jews themselves.1

Mark Weber
IHR speakers and writers contend that the Holocaust "hoax" (or "Holohoax," as they often call it) was perpetrated by Jews on a gullible public in order to create and support the State of Israel, and to defraud Western countries of billions of dollars in reparations payments to survivors. Some, including current IHR director Mark Weber (right), believe that Jews impose the guilt-inducing Holocaust "myth" on the West out of "contempt for non-Jewish humanity." Others, including Jurgen Graf, propose that the universal acceptance of the "gas chamber lie" is actually the first step in a plot by "shadowy, hidden forces" to "destroy all sovereign nations and establish a world government."

Institute of Nazism, Anti-Semitism and Anti-Zionism
While IHR is not characterized by the more explicit and recognizable features of neo-Nazi groups-like tattoos and shaved heads, the use of vulgar racial epithets and calls to violence-its political philosophy is premised on the adulation of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi regime and the belief that modern life is a struggle between Christians of European descent and Jews. Its affiliated Noontide Press publishes and disseminates Nazi and anti-Semitic classics such as The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, Mein Kampf, and The Myth of the Twentieth Century, along with contemporary titles like The Turner Diaries and David Duke's My Awakening. On audio tape, its offerings include Luftwaffe Songs and Stormtrooper Marches. Noontide Press's Web site now also offers full text versions of Mein Kampf and The International Jew, and an almost-complete reproduction in English of Nazi propagandist Julius Streicher's 1934 German children's book, The Poisonous Mushroom, including its caricatured illustrations of Jews and its obscene nursery rhymes.

The Poisonous Mushroom
"Here, kids, I have some candy for you. But you both have to come with me."
From The Poisonous Mushroom (1934)
A devil goes through the land,
The Jew he is, known to us all
As murderer of the peoples and polluter of the races,
The terror of children in every country!
He wants to ruin the youth.
He wants all peoples to die.
IHR has also maintained relationships with Nazi officers from World War II. When he died in 1994, the Belgian Nazi Leon Degrelle, who commanded an SS Division during World War II, was memorialized as a "friend of IHR" by Mark Weber. Indeed, until he died, the unrepentant Degrelle published long essays lauding Hitler in the Journal of Historical Review. The Journal also published articles admiring Hitler by Nazi General Otto Ernst Remer, who was instrumental in keeping der Führer in power after the failed assassination attempt against him in 1944, and who was a featured speaker at the eighth IHR conference in 1987. The Journal has featured articles by other, lesser-known Nazis as well.

These efforts, and many others, at justifying Hitler's actions, turn moral and historical judgments inside out. IHR portrays Hitler as a man of peace who was attacked by Allied powers jealous of the new nation he was building; it recasts Hitler's racism as a justified response to the purported hostility Jews and other minorities felt towards Germany; it glorifies Nazi war actions while decrying Allied operations as barbarous and criminal. It is as if Hitler's propaganda war was being re-fought; the speeches at IHR conferences, in fact, have often been larded with Goebbels' slogans.

Given its support for Nazism, IHR's hatred of Jews is hardly suprising.2 Speakers at conferences and writers in the Journal have alleged that Jews and Zionists, in de facto control of the U.S. government, dragged the U.S. into World War II against Germany and ever since have sought to enrich themselves and strengthen Israel at the expense of their gentile hosts. A 1982 JHR article attempted to persuade President Ronald Reagan that Judaism was a religion of "fanaticism, prejudice and discrimination."

An important component of JHR writings - and it has grown in importance over time - is anti-Israel propaganda. A common topic for JHR articles, for instance, has been the mistaken Israeli attack on the USS Liberty during the Six Day War: IHR authors frequently allege that the attack was deliberate, and concoct a variety of conspiracy theories to explain why Israel would have purposely attacked its American ally and patron.

Especially in recent years, however, some IHR writers and speakers, apparently no longer satisfied limiting their attacks to rhetorically sanitized "Zionists," have begun using the more "racial" and insinuating "Jewish-Zionist" in their writings. Director Mark Weber, for example, has written of the "Jewish-Zionist domination of the U.S. political system" and the "Jewish-Zionist hegemony over the American media," and warns that "Jewish-Zionist ambitions" clash with "American interests, and basic justice and humanity."

The Mermelstein Trials
As the distribution of the Journal of Historical Review to actual academics underscored, IHR's ambition to establish a broader audience for its brand of history was not likely to be satisfied. Another early publicity gimmick soon backfired even more spectacularly than the JHR distribution.

At IHR's first conference in 1979, the group offered $50,000 to anyone "who could prove that the Nazis operated gas-chambers to exterminate Jews during World War II."
At IHR's first conference in 1979, the group offered $50,000 to anyone "who could prove that the Nazis operated gas-chambers to exterminate Jews during World War II." Not content with announcing the "reward" among its own ranks, IHR also notified well-known Holocaust survivors and Jewish organizations. A California businessman, Mel Mermelstein, who was 17 when he was interned with his family at Auschwitz in 1944 (his mother and two sisters did not survive), and who later founded the Auschwitz Study Foundation, received the notice, signed by Lewis Brandon - one of the pseudonyms used by David McCalden, IHR's first director. Mermelstein remitted a notarized statement describing his internment at Auschwitz and his own observation, on May 22, 1944, of his mother and two sisters being driven by Nazi guards toward what he later learned was gas chamber number five. He received no clear response to either his initial or follow-up inquiries, but started getting Holocaust-denying hate literature in his mail and was described as a "racist" in leaflets that were distributed in his neighborhood. He filed suit against IHR for breach of contract, libel, and intentional infliction of emotional distress early in 1981.

In a pre-trial determination, the court took judicial notice - i.e., accepted as a well-known and indisputable fact - that Jews were gassed at Auschwitz [See box: "Judicial Notice"], and in July 1985 the lawsuit was settled in Mermelstein's favor. IHR was forced to pay the $50,000 reward as well as an additional $40,000 for pain and suffering. Under the terms of their agreement, IHR also issued Mermelstein a letter of apology.

Judicial Notice of the Holocaust: "It is simply a fact"
"Under Evidence Code Section 452(h), this Court does take judicial notice of the fact that Jews were gassed to death at the Auschwitz Concentration Camp in Poland during the summer of 1944…It just simply is a fact that falls within the definition of Evidence Code Section 452(h). It is not reasonably subject to dispute. And it is capable of immediate and accurate determination by resort to sources of reasonably indisputable accuracy. It is simply a fact."

--Judge Thomas T. Johnson, Superior Court of California, October 9, 1981



The legal battles between IHR and Mermelstein were not over, however. On August 6, 1986, IHR and Willis Carto sued Mermelstein, claiming that he libeled them during an interview on a New York City radio station. On February 29, 1988, they voluntarily dropped the charges. Mermelstein in turn sued IHR for libel, citing an issue of the IHR Newsletter (edited by Bradley Smith) that exposed the purported flaws and inconsistencies in his testimony in the original trial. Mermelstein dropped the suit in 1991.

The Carto Trials
In September 1993, the Institute's editorial staff and board of directors voted to terminate its association with Willis Carto, its founder. On October 4, 1993, Carto received a letter announcing that he had been "fired." According to court documents, the falling-out stemmed from finance-related matters, including the purchase of a new Cadillac by Carto's wife using IHR funds, Carto's purchase of an insufficient insurance policy prior to a 1984 arson that destroyed IHR's warehouse and offices, his skimping on pay and health benefits and his "launching and subsequent mishandling of the reward offer" in the Mel Mermelstein affair. IHR's director at the time, Tom Marcellus, also alleged that Carto planned to redesign the Journal for Historical Review into a more straightforwardly racist publication.

The most significant stake in this controversy was control of as much as $10 million in stock certificates bequeathed to IHR's parent corporation, The Legion for the Survival of Freedom, by Jean Farrel, an heir of Thomas Edison. The summer before Carto's "dismissal," Marcellus reportedly discovered a $100,000 bank order for Carto's Liberty Lobby drawn from the Farrel bequest. According to Marcellus, Carto had directed his wife to set up a corporation for the sole purpose of controlling Farrel's money and loaning it back to the Legion-thus making the Legion a less attractive target for potential lawsuits. Because the IHR defined itself as the Legion, the senior staffers demanded control of the money bequeathed to the parent company. Marcellus discovered that while Carto had long claimed to be merely the corporation's "agent," the Legion in fact listed as a corporate director a person who had been dead for five years, the board had never met and Carto was the sole and controlling voice. Marcellus and his colleagues and lawyer were able to assemble a new board that terminated all association with Carto.

While Carto had long claimed to be merely the corporation's "agent," the Legion in fact listed as a corporate director a person who had been dead for five years, the board had never met and Carto was the sole and controlling voice.
Carto's immediate response was to arrange a meeting with the IHR principals and their lawyer. On October 15, 1993, while they waited for Carto at the lawyer's office, he went instead to IHR headquarters with his wife and three others and began disconnecting telephones, changing locks and tampering with computers; he also faxed the IHR attorney, stating that he was "now in control of the IHR office." A scuffle ensued, and he was ultimately dragged from the premises by police as he screamed, "You're killing me."

As the dispute entered a long and complicated litigation that would involve several lawsuits - and prompt a relentless campaign of vituperation and false rumor by Carto - Carto's magazine The Spotlight announced in August 1994 that Liberty Lobby was launching a new publication devoted to historical revisionism called The Barnes Review (after the 20th century revisionist historian Harry Elmer Barnes).

On November 15, 1996, a California court ruled in favor of IHR, saying Carto owed the group and the Legion for the Survival of Freedom $6.43 million bequeathed by Farrel. The legal proceedings continued through November 2000, when the Court of Appeals upheld the lower court's ruling. To date IHR has not received the full amount from Carto, who declared bankruptcy in 2001.3

Recent Activities
The Carto lawsuits significantly detracted from the programming capabilities of IHR; especially during the mid-to-late 1990s, IHR was unable to publish its Journal of Historical Review on a consistent basis, and revisionist conferences were suspended from 1993 to 2000. Even with the lawsuits settled, however, IHR has been unable to regain its vitality of the 1980s.

For a time it looked like IHR was rebuilding momentum. In May 2000 the thirteenth IHR conference convened in Orange County, California, featuring old-timers like Arthur Butz, Robert Faurisson and Ernst Zündel, as well as a new generation of Holocaust deniers like Fredrick Töben, Germar Rudolf and Jürgen Graf. Another notable attendee was Holocaust denier David Irving, whose credibility had been demolished and anti-Semitism exposed in an unsuccessful libel suit against American professor Deborah Lipstadt a month earlier. The conference was one of the largest IHR had ever held, with about 150 people in attendance.

The group suffered a serious setback the following year, however, when it sought to host a conference on "Revisionism and Zionism" in Beirut, Lebanon, in cooperation with a Swiss Holocaust-denial organization, Vérité et Justice. The anti-Israel sentiment suggested in the conference title had always been an important part of IHR's output, but as parts of the Arab world demonstrated an affinity for Holocaust denial it became more central to the group's outreach; Mark Weber has even given interviews on Iranian radio.


The conference would not take place, however. Soon after it was announced, several Jewish organizations warned that it might lead to increased anti-Semitism in the region. According to reports in the Arab press, the U.S. State Department also urged the Lebanese government to ban the conference. Fourteen independent Arab intellectuals also denounced the conference, including Palestinian poet Mahmoud Darwish, Lebanese writer Elias Khoury and Palestinian-American professor Edward Said.

In late March 2001, Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik al-Hariri announced that his government would not permit the conference. "Lebanon has more important things to do than holding conferences that hurt its international standing and smear its name," al-Hariri said. While some free-speech advocates decried the decision, news of the ban was largely applauded by politicians and writers in the West. On March 30, IHR and Vérité et Justice officially announced that the conference was called off.

Today
IHR has never fully recovered from the Lebanon debacle. Since 2001 it has held several one-day conferences, but nothing matching the size or celebrity of its 2000 event. Meanwhile, other revisionist events - David Irving's yearly "Real History USA" conferences and Willis Carto's "Authentic History" meetings - have become increasingly popular. Moreover, IHR's Journal only sporadically appears and, most interestingly, the group has come under increasing criticism from other deniers decrying its poor management and increasing focus on anti-Israel propaganda at the expense of "traditional" historical revisionism. Germar Rudolf recently announced his plans to revitalize Bradley Smith's semi-defunct Revisionist to compete against the Journal. It remains uncertain how IHR will fare in this increasingly competitive world of Holocaust denial.
If your beliefs cannot stand up to your own sincere scrutiny and skeptical evaluation, they are not worth having.

https://freespeechmonika.wordpress.com/ ... t-details/

User avatar
stinky
Member
Member
Posts: 75
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2018 10:59 pm

Re: The ADL Reviews the Institute for Historical Review

Postby stinky » 6 months 3 days ago (Fri May 10, 2019 2:42 am)

Even a forum novice like myself can spot the many flaws in the ADL's 'review'.

This is one of my favourite's;

An important component of JHR writings - and it has grown in importance over time - is anti-Israel propaganda. A common topic for JHR articles, for instance, has been the mistaken Israeli attack on the USS Liberty during the Six Day War:


'mistaken Israeli attack' :lol:
It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled

User avatar
Lamprecht
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 1248
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:32 pm

Re: The ADL Reviews the Institute for Historical Review

Postby Lamprecht » 6 months 19 hours ago (Sun May 12, 2019 10:07 am)

The Mermelstein Trials
As the distribution of the Journal of Historical Review to actual academics underscored, IHR's ambition to establish a broader audience for its brand of history was not likely to be satisfied. Another early publicity gimmick soon backfired even more spectacularly than the JHR distribution.

At IHR's first conference in 1979, the group offered $50,000 to anyone "who could prove that the Nazis operated gas-chambers to exterminate Jews during World War II."
At IHR's first conference in 1979, the group offered $50,000 to anyone "who could prove that the Nazis operated gas-chambers to exterminate Jews during World War II." Not content with announcing the "reward" among its own ranks, IHR also notified well-known Holocaust survivors and Jewish organizations. A California businessman, Mel Mermelstein, who was 17 when he was interned with his family at Auschwitz in 1944 (his mother and two sisters did not survive), and who later founded the Auschwitz Study Foundation, received the notice, signed by Lewis Brandon - one of the pseudonyms used by David McCalden, IHR's first director. Mermelstein remitted a notarized statement describing his internment at Auschwitz and his own observation, on May 22, 1944, of his mother and two sisters being driven by Nazi guards toward what he later learned was gas chamber number five. He received no clear response to either his initial or follow-up inquiries, but started getting Holocaust-denying hate literature in his mail and was described as a "racist" in leaflets that were distributed in his neighborhood. He filed suit against IHR for breach of contract, libel, and intentional infliction of emotional distress early in 1981.

In a pre-trial determination, the court took judicial notice - i.e., accepted as a well-known and indisputable fact - that Jews were gassed at Auschwitz [See box: "Judicial Notice"], and in July 1985 the lawsuit was settled in Mermelstein's favor. IHR was forced to pay the $50,000 reward as well as an additional $40,000 for pain and suffering. Under the terms of their agreement, IHR also issued Mermelstein a letter of apology.


This is incorrect, except the part about "Judicial Notice" -- the court simply assumed that the gassing of Jews was indisputable fact, there was no trial proving such a thing.

See also:

The Mermelstein Lie
https://codoh.com/library/document/1740/

Final Victory in the Mermelstein Case
https://codoh.com/library/document/2402/

About the IHR/Mermelstein Settlement
https://codoh.com/library/document/2490/

From above:
With so many wild rumors still being circulated about the IHR/Mermelstein settlement, we want to remind our readers that, contrary to what has gone out through the press and media:

1. The settlement agreement did not include any provision for a payment of any reward offer, and in fact was not such a payment.
2. The IHR did not accept or in any way agree with Judge Johnson’s ridiculous 1981 “judicial notice” that Jews were “in fact” exterminated in “gas chambers” at Auschwitz.
3. The IHR has not retreated one inch from its well-known position that there is no credible evidence to support the theory that Germans allegedly used homicidal poison gas chambers to exterminate the Jews of Europe.
4. The letter of apology addressed the “suffering” some Jews said they experienced around the $50,000 award offer. It did not apologize for revisionist theory or revisionist literature in any way.

Following is the complete text of the letter our lawyers signed:

Each of the answering defendants do hereby officially and formally apologize to Mr. Mel Mermelstein, a survivor of Auschwitz-Birkenau and Buchenwald, and all other survivors of Auschwitz for the pain, anguish, and suffering he and all other Auschwitz survivors have sustained relating to the $50,000 reward offer for proof that ‘Jews were gassed in gas chambers at Auschwitz’."

Any person or organization that claims our lawyers signed any apology other than these few lines is either mistaken or knowingly distributing false information.
"There is a principal which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance -- that principal is contempt prior to investigation."
-- Herbert Spencer


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: MSN [Bot] and 7 guests