Al Jazeera caves in, pulls video claiming Holocaust was 'different from how the Jews tell it'

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 9842
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Al Jazeera caves in, pulls video claiming Holocaust was 'different from how the Jews tell it'

Postby Hannover » 4 months 3 days ago (Mon May 20, 2019 11:52 am)

Al Jazeera is now part of the 'controlled opposition'.
They deny their people the right to free speech by caving into Zionist lies they claim to be resisting.

Excerpt:
"The Jews weren't the only targets of the Nazis, but also Gypsies [Roma], the disabled, homosexuals, and Arabs and Christians, too," the video's presenter, Muna Hawwa, said. "In all, the Nazis killed 20 million people during the Holocaust and the Final Solution, and the Jews were just a part of that. Then why does the world focus so much on Jews?"

Muna Hawwa, an actor BTW, is clearly misinformed, as has been shown repeatedly; but at least emphasizes the fact that Jew supremacist thinking is at work.

Read on, comments invited.

- Hannover

Why have Jews been promoting their '6,000,000 dead Jews' lie since at least 1823?

https://www.haaretz.com/middle-east-new ... -1.7255111
Al Jazeera pulls video claiming Holocaust was 'different from how the Jews tell it'

Video posted to AJ+ Arabic's social media pages says Jews skewed Holocaust facts and statistics to get reparations from Germany, and that the establishment of Israel was derived from Nazi ideology

Image

l-Jazeera's AJ+ Arabic channel pulled a video it posted to its social media channels Friday night that claimed Jews exploit the Holocaust and that Israel is the genocide's "greatest beneficiary." Two journalists who created the video were later suspended.

2/2 Holocaust Denial on Al-Jazeera Network: Israel Is Biggest Winner from Holocaust; It Uses the Same Justification to Annihilate the Palestinians pic.twitter.com/BMb25DYFTY
— MEMRI (@MEMRIReports) May 19, 2019

The seven minute-long, Arabic-language video asserted that though the Holocaust did occur, "it's different from how the Jews tell it," Israeli media reported.

AJ+ Arabic, the youth-focused, online current-events channel of Qatar's official Al Jazeera Media Network, posted the video on its social media platforms with the caption "The gas chambers killed millions of Jews…So the story says. How true is the #Holocaust and how did the Zionists benefit from it?"

Cool & youthful pan-Arab @AJplus is peddling to millions the notion that Israel is the #1 beneficiary of the Holocaust, an exaggerated event used as an excuse to extract German money & exterminate the Palestinians. pic.twitter.com/egy2WOVvOQ
— Noga Tarnopolsky (@NTarnopolsky) May 18, 2019

Before its removal from the platforms on Saturday, the post reportedly gained 1.1 million views on Facebook and Twitter. After it was deleted, Al Jazeera said the piece violated the network's editorial standards.

"The Jews weren't the only targets of the Nazis, but also Gypsies [Roma], the disabled, homosexuals, and Arabs and Christians, too," the video's presenter, Muna Hawwa, said. "In all, the Nazis killed 20 million people during the Holocaust and the Final Solution, and the Jews were just a part of that. Then why does the world focus so much on Jews?"

According to the video, pre-war Europe's Jews were able to emphasize their suffering because they were wealthy and controlled media companies. In addition, it claims, the "statistics were inflated by the Zionist movement to help them establish Israel."

In fact, Israel's Channel 13 notes, the video says "the establishment of the State of Israel itself is derived from the national ideology of the Nazis."

The video asks "How did Israel gain from the Holocaust?" and goes on to discuss the 1933 Transfer Agreement, in which Zionist groups in Mandate Palestine negotiated with the Nazis to allow 60,000 German Jews to leave for Palestine and take some of their assets with them.

The Jews "exploited the Holocaust for their agenda and made the whole world focus on their murders and forget the other victims," in order to receive money from Germany, it claims, adding that "six decades after the Holocaust," and compared to other countries that were affected by it – "the reparations that Israel received were disproportionate."

Arabic content versus English content pic.twitter.com/Ag8T95nEVK
— Jenan Moussa (@jenanmoussa) May 18, 2019

We must unequivocally condemn the Holocaust, the video says. "But Israel – who benefitted the most from the Holocaust – uses the same pretexts as the Nazis to commit ethnic cleansing against the Palestinians and eliminate them."

This @ajplusarabi “explanation “ of the Holocaust is the worst kind of pernicious evil. That’s how @AlJazeera brainwashes young people in the Arab world and perpetuates hatred of Israel and the Jews. Lies and evil propagated by the ideological descendants of “ Der Stürmer”. https://t.co/8mqRINZP2i
— Emmanuel Nahshon (@EmmanuelNahshon) May 18, 2019

Al-Jazeera later said it suspended the two journalists who produced the video in a statement published on its website Sunday.

"Al Jazeera completely disowns the offensive content in question and reiterated that Al Jazeera would not tolerate such material on any of the Network’s platforms," Dr. Yaser Bishr the Executive Director of Digital Division said. Bishr also said that he called for a mandatory bias training and awareness program.

Many Twitter users were quick to condemn the video. Jenan Moussa of Dubai's Al Aan TV compared the AJ+ Arabic post to a different one on its English-language counterpart, in which a Holocaust survivor tells his story.

@ajplusarabi aired an anti-Semitic video on the #Holocaust, spreading lies about it & about Israel, specifically on #Ramadan in order to incite the masses.

It's been removed. We'll keep fighting anti-Semitism on Arab media, including on @AJArabic-an inciting propaganda machine. pic.twitter.com/IYIVztW8mC
— Ofir Gendelman (@ofirgendelman) May 18, 2019

Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs Spokesperson Emmanuel Nahshon wrote on Twitter Saturday that the AJ+ video "is the worst kind of pernicious evil. That's how Al Jazeera brainwashes young people in the Arab world and perpetuates hatred of Israel and the Jews. Lies and evil propogated by the ideological descendants of 'Der Stormer.'"

The Foreign Ministry's Arabic-language Twitter account rebutted the video in a series of tweets, responding to each claim in the AJ+ post.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's Arabic media spokesperson, Ofir Gendelman, also responded. AJ+ "aired an anti-Semitic video on the Holocaust, spreading lies about it & about Israel, specifically on Ramadan in order to incite the masses," he wrote. "It's been removed. We'll keep fighting anti-Semitism on Arab media, including on [Al Jazeera Arabic] - an inciting propaganda machine."

On Saturday evening, Al Jazeera's public relations account acknowledged the removal of the post. It tweeted that "Al Jazeera Media Network deleted a video produced by AJ+ Arabic because it violated the editorial standards of the Network."
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

User avatar
JLAD Prove Me Wrong
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 325
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2018 8:35 pm

Re: Al Jazeera caves in, pulls video claiming Holocaust was 'different from how the Jews tell it'

Postby JLAD Prove Me Wrong » 4 months 3 days ago (Mon May 20, 2019 12:33 pm)

Hannover wrote:Al Jazeera is now part of the 'controlled opposition'.
They deny their people the right to free speech by caving into Zionist lies they claim to be resisting.


I don't fully agree. Al Jazeera does expose Zionism better than the American Zionist media monopolies do. I think they made a mistake in this regard, and it could be an indication that Zionist Jews are taking over Al Jazeera, as they did long ago with American Jewish-run media, but as it stands, I like Al Jazeera, hate this decision, and hope that Zionists don't buy the company as they have in America.
If your beliefs cannot stand up to your own sincere scrutiny and skeptical evaluation, they are not worth having.

https://freespeechmonika.wordpress.com/ ... t-details/

User avatar
Lamprecht
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 1067
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:32 pm

Re: Al Jazeera caves in, pulls video claiming Holocaust was 'different from how the Jews tell it'

Postby Lamprecht » 4 months 3 days ago (Mon May 20, 2019 12:59 pm)

So now the nazis killed 20 million? I thought it was supposed to be 11 million (6m jew + 5m others), then the jews admitted that the 5 million number has "no scholarly basis" ... now how did they get 20 million? Tomorrow it will be 30 million. Soon, it will be in the billions, then the trillions. Eventually the nazis will be blamed on a supernova destroying multiple solar systems.

5 million gentiles / 11 million total victims - "a number without any scholarly basis" invented by Simon Wiesenthal
viewtopic.php?t=12403
"There is a principal which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance -- that principal is contempt prior to investigation."
-- Herbert Spencer

User avatar
borjastick
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2486
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 5:52 am
Location: Europe

Re: Al Jazeera caves in, pulls video claiming Holocaust was 'different from how the Jews tell it'

Postby borjastick » 4 months 2 days ago (Tue May 21, 2019 1:44 am)

The focus of their message appears to be the insignificant 6m jewish deaths in the holocaust in a total figure of 20m. Firstly where does the 20m figure come from, it's total rubbish.

But the real question mark should be not an inflated death toll of 20 to make jewish suffering tiny but that there were no 6m jews killed in the holocaust, full stop.
'Of the four million Jews under Nazi control in WW2, six million died and alas only five million survived.'

'We don't need evidence, we have survivors' - israeli politician

Breker
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 756
Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 5:39 pm
Location: Europa

Re: Al Jazeera caves in, pulls video claiming Holocaust was 'different from how the Jews tell it'

Postby Breker » 3 months 2 weeks ago (Wed Jun 05, 2019 11:27 pm)

We now see that supposedly "Quatar owned" Al Jazeera is celebrating' Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) Pride Month.
A month? Who decided that?
Of course Al Jazeera says nothing about Qatar’s strict laws against homosexuality. Why?

article here:
https://www.breitbart.com/national-secu ... -policies/
sample:
In a video posted on Twitter by the online media outlet AJ+, a component of the Al Jazeera Media Network (AJMN), the state-owned appears to blame homophobia on Christianity.
While showing footage of a church and priests, the video suggests it is Christians who are “telling our youth that they are different, that they are bad, that they are broken.”
According to the CIA World Factbook, only 14 percent of Qatar’s population is Christian while nearly 70 percent is Muslim. Yet, the tiny Gulf country criminalizes homosexuality, unlike the vast majority of Christian-majority Western nations.

Perhaps these help explain Al Jazeera's rather curious position a bit:

Israel is the gayest country on earth
https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/israel- ... -on-earth/

STUDY: One-Third of Israelis Are Bisexual
https://www.advocate.com/world/2015/08/ ... e-bisexual

Jews more than twice as likely to be gay, lesbian
http://akinokure.blogspot.com.au/2012/0 ... to-be.html

Welcome to Tel Aviv, the gayest city on earth
https://www.bostonglobe.com/lifestyle/t ... story.html
and: https://www.jewishpress.com/news/is-tel ... 016/03/19/

Israel becoming 'safe haven for paedophiles' with laws that allow any Jews to legally return
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/worl ... 45246.html
B.
Revisionists are just the messengers, the impossibility of the "Holocaust" narrative is the message.

User avatar
Lamprecht
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 1067
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:32 pm

Re: Al Jazeera caves in, pulls video claiming Holocaust was 'different from how the Jews tell it'

Postby Lamprecht » 3 months 1 day ago (Fri Jun 21, 2019 8:01 pm)

Breker wrote:We now see that supposedly "Quatar owned" Al Jazeera is celebrating' Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) Pride Month.
A month? Who decided that?
Of course Al Jazeera says nothing about Qatar’s strict laws against homosexuality. Why?

article here:
https://www.breitbart.com/national-secu ... -policies/
sample:
In a video posted on Twitter by the online media outlet AJ+, a component of the Al Jazeera Media Network (AJMN), the state-owned appears to blame homophobia on Christianity.
While showing footage of a church and priests, the video suggests it is Christians who are “telling our youth that they are different, that they are bad, that they are broken.”
According to the CIA World Factbook, only 14 percent of Qatar’s population is Christian while nearly 70 percent is Muslim. Yet, the tiny Gulf country criminalizes homosexuality, unlike the vast majority of Christian-majority Western nations.

Perhaps these help explain Al Jazeera's rather curious position a bit:

Israel is the gayest country on earth
https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/israel- ... -on-earth/

STUDY: One-Third of Israelis Are Bisexual
https://www.advocate.com/world/2015/08/ ... e-bisexual

Jews more than twice as likely to be gay, lesbian
http://akinokure.blogspot.com.au/2012/0 ... to-be.html

Welcome to Tel Aviv, the gayest city on earth
https://www.bostonglobe.com/lifestyle/t ... story.html
and: https://www.jewishpress.com/news/is-tel ... 016/03/19/

Israel becoming 'safe haven for paedophiles' with laws that allow any Jews to legally return
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/worl ... 45246.html
B.
More:

Homosexuality Is Part of Jewish Tradition
https://www.haaretz.com/jewish/.premium ... -1.5383449

There are various religious passages in the Talmud condoning pedophilia, incest, homosexuality, and all sorts of things of that nature

Sex with Children by Talmud Rules
https://archive.is/UkxK6

According to the Talmud, Adam had intercourse with every single animal in the Garden of Eden before Eve. (Tractate Yebamoth - Folio 63a)
https://archive.is/YwXiU#selection-311.20-311.123

In the Winter 2004 edition of The Jewish Quarterly, in an article titled 'Triple Exthnics' Professor Nathan Abrams boasted about the overwhelmingly Jewish role in promotion of pornography
https://archive.is/5x0oK

Rev. Ted Pike: Judaism and Homosexuality: A marriage made in hell
https://archive.is/ZM2YF

Biden: Jewish leaders drove gay marriage changes
https://archive.is/4Xrf9

Jewish Leaders Behind The Homosexual and Lesbian Movement
https://archive.is/QBbKT

The Jewish Masters Of Porn
https://archive.is/l4zwJ

Liberal Jew Jane Litman, in her September 2000 essay, Working with Words of Torah:
“The background sound in the small library is muted but intense. Pairs of scholars lean over their Talmudic texts whispering energetically, trying to puzzle out the meaning of the particular sugya, passage.

The teacher directs them back toward the group and asks for questions. One student raises a hand: ‘I don’t understand verse 5:4 of the tractate Niddah. What does the phrase ‘it is like a finger in eye,’ mean? The teacher responds:

‘This refers to the hymen of a girl younger than three years old. The Sages believed that in the case of toddler rape, the hymen would fully grow back by the time the girl reached adulthood and married. Therefore, though violated, she would still technically be counted as a virgin and could marry a priest.

It’s an analogy: putting your finger in the eye is uncomfortable, but causes no lasting harm.’

There is a collective gasp of breath among students. Their dismay is palpable. They do not like this particular Talmudic text or the men behind it. But its authors, the Talmudic rabbis, hardly wrote it with this particular group of students in mind, mostly thirty, and forty-year old women in suburban Philadelphia taking a four-week class titled ‘Women in Jewish Law,’ at their Reform synagogue. The questioner persists.

‘I don’t understand. Are you saying this refers to the rape of a three year-old girl?’

‘Or younger,’ the teacher responds dryly.

‘I don’t see how it says anything about rape and hymens. You must be mistaken. I don’t believe the rabbis are talking about rape at all. I think this statement has nothing to do with the rest of the passage.’

The teacher (I’ll admit now that it was me, a second-year rabbinic student) responds: ‘Well, that’s the common understanding. What do you think it means?’

The woman is clearly agitated. ‘I don’t know, but I do know that it couldn’t be about child rape.’

This is week three of the class. The woman does not return for week four.”
Source: https://archive.is/GUqrE


Jewish historian, Israel Shahak, in his 1994 magnum opus 'Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years' claimed:
“According to the Talmudic Encyclopedia: ‘If a Jew has coitus with a Gentile woman, whether she be a child of three or an adult, whether married or unmarried, and even if he is a minor aged only nine years and one day, because he had wilful coitus with her, she must be killed, as is the case with a beast, because through her a Jew got into trouble.

The Jew, however, must be flogged, and if he is Kohen (member of the priestly caste) he must receive double the number of lashes, because he has committed a double offence: a Kohen must not have intercourse with a prostitute, and all Gentile women are presumed to be prostitutes’…

This does not imply that sexual intercourse between a Jewish man and a Gentile woman is permitted, quite the contrary. But the main punishment is inflicted on the Gentile woman; she must be executed, even if she was raped by the Jew.”
Preview: https://books.google.com/books?id=avh6d ... &q&f=false
Book: https://archive.is/I6sNz

Let's not forget about "metzitzah b'peh" (oral suction) - a part of the Jewish circumcision ritual in which a mohel (circumciser) personally sucks on the freshly mutilated penis. I won't post any images but, believe me, they are not hard to find. Google "jewish infant herpes circumcision" and you will find countless cases of herpes being passed on to infants. Undoubtedly, the vast majority of cases never make it to the news!



More from the Talmud (the most holy text of Judaism):
ImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImage
"There is a principal which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance -- that principal is contempt prior to investigation."
-- Herbert Spencer

flimflam
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 171
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2015 9:19 am
Contact:

Re: Al Jazeera caves in, pulls video claiming Holocaust was 'different from how the Jews tell it'

Postby flimflam » 3 months 1 day ago (Fri Jun 21, 2019 9:00 pm)

Lamprecht wrote:
Jewish historian, Israel Shahak, in his 1994 magnum opus 'Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years' claimed:
“According to the Talmudic Encyclopedia: ‘If a Jew has coitus with a Gentile woman, whether she be a child of three or an adult, whether married or unmarried, and even if he is a minor aged only nine years and one day, because he had wilful coitus with her, she must be killed, as is the case with a beast, because through her a Jew got into trouble.


This is from Maimondes' Mishneh Torah .. and is promoted by Chabad .... https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/960660/jewish/Issurei-Biah-Chapter-Twelve.htm

(Mishah Torah - Sefer Kedushah - Issurei Biah - Chapter Twelve)

10

If, by contrast, a Jewish male enters into relations with a gentile woman, when he does so intentionally, she should be executed.23 She is executed because she caused a Jew to be involved in an unseemly transgression, as [is the law with regard to] an animal.24 [This applies regardless of] whether the gentile women was a minor of three years of age,25 or an adult, whether she was single or married. And it applies even if [the Jew] was a minor of nine years old, [she is executed].26

This [punishment] is explicitly mentioned in the Torah, as [Numbers 31:16-17] states: Behold they were [involved] with the children of Israel according to the advice of Balaamו.27 Execute any woman fit to know a man through lying with a male.
[/quote]

A Chabad rabbi elucidates ...
https://www.bitchute.com/video/KEQax6wJI3qc/

See also the 2nd answer to https://www.quora.com/Has-Justice-Ginsburg-stated-that-the-age-of-consent-should-be-128

User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 9842
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Re: Al Jazeera caves in, pulls video claiming Holocaust was 'different from how the Jews tell it'

Postby Hannover » 3 months 1 day ago (Sat Jun 22, 2019 12:27 am)

Al Jazeera said:
"The Jews weren't the only targets of the Nazis, but also Gypsies [Roma], the disabled, homosexuals, and Arabs and Christians, too," the video's presenter, Muna Hawwa, said."

Complete nonsense without a shred of proof.

Arabs Throw Homosexual from Rooftop
http://www.breitbart.com/jerusalem/2017 ... y-rooftop/
Image

The German National Socialist policies and actions towards homosexuals were no different than other governments at the time, and in many cases less severe. There is absolutely no proof that they executed homosexuals, none. Equally, there is no proof for the empty claim about gypsies, Arabs, and Christians.

The 'homosexuals, gypsies, & 'others' canard is merely an attempt to buy votes for their laughable and impossible '6M & gas chambers'.

see:
The "Gassing" of Gypsies in Auschwitz on August 2, 1944, By Carlo Mattogno : https://codoh.com/library/document/1488/?lang=en
"Consequently, we can be certain that the story about the gassing of the gypsy-camp is not grounded in historical fact."

Gypsy Holocaust? The Gypsies under the National Socialist Regime, By Carlo Mattogno : https://codoh.com/library/document/3239/?lang=en

The Myth of a Nazi Extermination of Homosexuals, by Jack Wikoff
http://www.cwporter.com/homo.htm

Gypsies and Homosexuals in the Camps
http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=1894

homosexuals - Yad Vashem ...
http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=1930

- Hannover

No alleged human remains of millions to be seen in allegedly known locations, no 'holocaust'.
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests