Lamprecht wrote:49 A.D. - Rome, Italy - Jews Expelled by Emperor Claudius for “always rioting” (E. Mary Smallwood, ‘The Jews Under Roman Rule: From Pompey To Diocletian’, p. 210)
This one is referenced in the book of Acts in the New Testament.
Acts 18: 2
And found a certain Jew named Aquila, born in Pontus, lately come from Italy, with his wife Priscilla; (because that Claudius had commanded all Jews to depart from Rome:) and came unto them.
What happened in Germany is really not so different than what has happened so many times in the past, the primary difference being that it occurred in the age of Jewish mass media.
Here is Hitler speaking on January 30, 1939. He explains the rationale for exiling them.
Do not reproach me on the grounds of your humanitarian concerns. The German Volk does not wish to be governed by another people; it does not wish others to determine its affairs in its place. France to the French; England to the English; America to the Americans, and Germany to the Germans! We are determined to undercut the efforts of a certain foreign people to nest here; a people whose members knew how to capture all leading positions. We will banish this people. We are willing to educate our own Volk to assume these leadership functions. We have hundreds of thousands of the most intelligent children of peasants and workers. We will have them educated, and we are already educating them. We are hoping that one day we can place them in all leading positions within the state along with others from our educated classes.
No longer shall these be occupied by members of a people alien to us.
Above all, as the literal meaning of the term already indicates, German culture is exclusively German; it is not Jewish. Hence we shall place the administration and the care for our culture in the hands of our Volk. Should the rest of the world be outraged and protest hypocritically against Germany’s barbarous expulsion of such an extraordinary, culturally valuable, irreplaceable element, then we can only be astonished at the consequences such a stance would imply.
I believe the earlier this problem is resolved, the better. For Europe cannot find peace before it has dealt properly with the Jewish question.
It is possible that the necessity of resolving this problem sooner or later should bring about agreement in Europe, even between nations which otherwise might not have reconciled themselves as readily with one another. There is more than enough room for settlement on this earth. All we need to do is put an end to the prevailing assumption that the Dear Lord chose the Jewish people to be the beneficiaries of a certain percentage of the productive capacities of other peoples’ bodies and their labors. Either the Jews will have to adjust to constructive, respectable activities, such as other people are already engaged in, or, sooner or later, they will succumb to a crisis of yet inconceivable proportions.
These are the same complaints you see in the middle ages and even earlier. The Jews form a specialized caste within a society and tend to dominate it for their own benefit and to the detriment of the general public. They live high on the hog while they are in power (often with the protection of their bought-and-paid-for elite Gentile collaborators), but things tend to shift against them suddenly and they find themselves on the outs.
Each of these events should also be understood as a "holocaust" from the Jewish perspective. Their history is one of perpetual holocausts. Jews of course scoff at the revisionist position that the final solution was "only" deportation. But just think if the United States were to exile Jews en masse and imagine the drama this would entail. "It's anudda shoah!" There is no question in my mind that Jews would react as though they were being exterminated.