Jewish War on Free Speech - Semitic Controversies

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
User avatar
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2350
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:32 pm

Jewish War on Free Speech - Semitic Controversies

Postby Lamprecht » 1 year 6 months ago (Fri Aug 16, 2019 7:51 pm)

A few weeks ago, the Semitic Controversies blog was showing a "Blog has been removed" message. I had emailed Karl Radl about if he had backed up the articles, and then lo and behold he emailed me back a few days later informing me that Google had reinstated it and told him that it was "incorrectly deleted by an AI program" :roll:

The blog is updated regularly with well-researched articles, and a decent chunk of them are about the Holocaust. The following article seems to be the first of a new series that he will be posting. It details a number of recent events in which Jews have tried to censor free speech.
Jewish War on Free Speech

We begin this first edition of ‘Jewish War on Free Speech’ after jewish-owned Google deplatforming and deleting ‘Semitic Controversies’ out of hand with the news that jews have been shrieking that ‘anti-Semites’ ‘need to be stopped’. They aren’t looking to do this via debate and actually trying to – in their words – ‘counter the anti-Semitic narrative’ but rather simply by exercising the power that it is an ‘anti-Semitic canard’ to suggest they have and get so-called ‘anti-Semites’ deplatformed and for preference prosecuted and thrown into prison for nothing more than the ‘crime’ of noticing certain (((co-incidences))).

Michael Fromm – the Chairman of the ‘Jewish Council for Public Affairs’ – has called for a fresh ‘strategy for fighting anti-Semitism’ (1) which has been echoed by US Vice President and devoted Shabbos goy Mike Pence (2) as well as a ‘conference’ on the subject sponsored by the US Justice Department. (3) This has generated some of the more politically correct responses of demands to legally equate criticism of Israel as being the same thing as ‘anti-Semitism’ and thus the so-called ‘Holocaust’ (4) as well as the usual rhetorical claptrap spouted by histrionically paranoid jews (5) using their own massively broad definition of ‘anything jews take offence to is ipso facto anti-Semitism’ to inflate the numbers. (6)

It has also generated some demands from jews - such as Edward Beck at the ‘Times of Israel’, (7) Jonathan Tobin at the ‘Jewish Press’ (8) and Mike Evans at the ‘Jerusalem Post’ – (9) stopping a millimeter short of demanding the outright physical extermination of non-jews who criticize them.

What this would mean – as it is increasingly likely that something like this is going to be seriously proposed by Shabbos goyim working for the Israel lobby around the world but particularly in the West – is that any act of so-called ‘anti-Semitism’ would result in disproportionate and dare I say extreme retribution from international jewry.

After all only this week we have learned that according to jewry the following are ‘examples’ of anti-Semitism:

A) Sale of non-kosher books by Amazon. (10)

B) Inviting someone to speak that jews do not approve of. (11)

C) Having private views different to those prescribed by international jewry. (12)

D) Running through a ‘Holocaust Memorial’. (13)

E) Criticizing Israel. (14)

F) Saying something you didn’t say but jews imagine you did. (15)

G) Disagreeing with Israel occupying other people’s land. (16)

H) Offending a jew in any way, shape or form. (17)

In other words; international jewry is demanding it have dominion over you, your family and your friends to ascertain whether you are sufficiently philo-Semitic enough to live.

Men of the West… you have nothing left to lose but your chains!
Full article with references: ... peech.html or

"If freedom of speech is taken away, then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter."
- George Washington


Media bias, control, & censorship / quotes of note

Youtube censorship - the lights are going out

by Ron Unz: 'Banned by Amazon and Purged by the Neocons' / The Usual Enemies of Free Speech are desperate

Official list of Revisionist scholars persecuted / imprisoned for questioning the "Holocaust"

Jewish War on the 2nd Amendment
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance -- that principle is contempt prior to investigation."
— Herbert Spencer

User avatar
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2813
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 5:52 am
Location: Europe

Re: Jewish War on Free Speech - Semitic Controversies

Postby borjastick » 1 year 6 months ago (Sat Aug 17, 2019 11:27 am)

Or put very simply by Hannover -

An anti-semite is anyone or anything a jew doesn't like.
'Of the four million Jews under Nazi control in WW2, six million died and alas only five million survived.'

'We don't need evidence, we have survivors' - israeli politician

Posts: 21
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 5:31 pm

Re: Jewish War on Free Speech - Semitic Controversies

Postby Daniel » 1 year 6 months ago (Sat Aug 17, 2019 3:10 pm)

I noticed it down as well and glad to see it back up. It's always struck me as odd that Jewish-owned websites such as Blogger, which is owned by the Jewish-owned Google, will tolerate any anti-Jewish material. It's not as if "anti-semites" have any power, and so I'd think the fallout from censoring such people wouldn't be much of a factor. Could Blogger be sued by Karl Radl? They're hosting his site for free, to boot.

Google used to tolerate the website being ranked in the first 10 results to the search word "Jew". For years this website figured somewhere in the first 10 results. But a check of the first 10 Google results for "Jew" doesn't show The highest-ranked anti-Jewish website for "jew" is the Metapedia entry for jew on page 9. Sergey Brin discusses with an Israeli reporter [at 3:49]:

borjastick wrote:Or put very simply by Hannover -

An anti-semite is anyone or anything a jew doesn't like.

That's a good definition. Joe Sobran included that in Sobran's Cynosure.

Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests