I hope everyone will participate in the debate. If you look at the thread there isn't really much there, tired arguments using the supposed 'air photo evidence', the gas chamber cremation Himmler document from October 26th 1943 and of course, the bogus Hoess testimony. This person clearly hasn't heard of codoh or the Holocaust Handbooks (http://holocausthandbooks.com/) so I made a tweet letting them know of the existence of coherent revisionist material.
Here are some of the documents Twitter user Wyatt would have us believe debunk Holocaust Revisionism. Perhaps someone in the thread here could debunk them for us.
Krema 2 document.
Twitter user Wyatt typhus accusation.
Hmmm where have I seen this photograph before?
Finally! This random twitter user has let us know that the pitts in-fact do exist!! I've seen @Hannover ask for this evidence time and time again, perhaps Wyatt actually has it this time? Is it all over for Revisionism?
Holocaust deniers are just lazy! We have no evidence!
Even though Carlo Mattogno has uncovered more primary documents than any other Holocaust researcher, I guess he's just lazy?
Lastly, a "fun fact" is that more 60 of the citations in this index refer to documents in Carlo Mattogno's work. How odd that a guy who supposedly does nothing but tell lies for fun all day (as is apparently believed at HC) would earn such recognition as to be referenced so heavily in an index of Holocaust research. Maybe Revisionists can be respected historians, after all...
Another graphic. I remember making a post on this myself. https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=12399&p=91954#p91954
The ovens. I wonder if this has been debunked before?
2-5 bodies burning in one oven? Interesting....
See the first link to the entire thread. It's not much longer than these examples I posted here.
But it looks like we've been debunked boys. Time to pack it up.
But before that, I would like to invite this user to the forum to debate. But I think we all know how that will turn out, the confident Twitter user will not dare show their face on this forum. They trash talk revisionists so harshly, and are so certain of their victory and evidence yet what will happen? They'll refuse to come, they'll refuse debate and freeze like deer in headlights. They know they'd get obliterated on a forum like this but they're too 'brave' to say it. So, let's just sit back and wait for the shifting goal posts and excuses. I'll update this post if I get a reply with the inevitable answer.