Baddiel does make a few interesting statements in this report:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/arti ... enier.html
1. 'ignoring them has not worked'
So the method of ignoring the holocaust doubters has not worked. That's good to know.
2. "It doesn't mean that confronting them will work completely but I think it's a debate we have to have,...my personal feeling is that you have to try to take them on.' "
Thus, he is willing to debate. I commend him for that. But, he should learn to listen to peope, when he is debating instead of interrupting them constantly.
3. "'We have a policy on hate speech so direct attacks on Jewish people will come off the platform. But to make the wrong statement about the facts of the Holocaust – "I do not think the Holocaust happened", or "I think the Holocaust happened with this number of people dead or that number of people dead" – may be permitted on the platform,' he (facebook representative) said.
Baddiel argued back, insisting that Holocaust denial is: 'A direct way of saying Jews are liars, Jews have tricked the world for their own gain.
Jews are the most evil, pernicious race that exist. It is hate speech. There's no other conclusion.'"
That simply not true. I believe that Mr. Baddiel and most other Jews honestly believe in the holocaust because that's what they were taught. They believe in the holocaust in the same way christians believe in the resurrection of christ. So merely not believing in parts of the holocaust does not mean that all the jews are lying about the holocaust.
What is in fact happening here is that Mr. Baddiel is projecting his hatred for unbelievers onto the unbelievers in the holocaust. This is a common phenomenon among Jewish holocaust believers.
4. "He said: 'I sort of knew I wouldn't change his mind but I felt it was important for people to see the ludicrousness of this position.' "
That's why you chose to argue with Mr. Muldeen and not with one of the leading holocaust revisionists, the top 2 being Germar Rudolf and Carlo Mattogno.
I am pretty sure that Mr. Baddiel is well aware of CODOH, the most important online site for holocaust revisionism.
Next time you try to take on a "holocaust denier", why don't you take on one of their leading representatives? If you can refute them in an open debate then you will have done more against holocaut denial than all the censorship in the world combined!
My venture into doubting parts of the holocaust narrative really took off when I started reading Rudolf's and Mattogno's books. Thus, I am looking forward to watching a debate like that. We just want an Open Debate On the HOLOCAUST!
Why do people oppose open debate?
Think about it!
If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.