Coronavirus as a public health comparison to those of Germany in Eastern territories in 1940s

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
EtienneSC
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 573
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2011 2:27 pm

Coronavirus as a public health comparison to those of Germany in Eastern territories in 1940s

Postby EtienneSC » 5 months 4 weeks ago (Fri Mar 27, 2020 1:55 pm)

Many of us will not have lived through a public health emergency of the sort currently arising from Covid-19 (coronavirus). Hence it may be of interest to compare the scenarios considered by governments with those of Germany in the Eastern territories in the 1940s. In the case of the UK, there has been scenario planning involving mortality of over half a million people. This is from the BBC:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-51915302
Change course or a quarter of a million people will die in a "catastrophic epidemic" of coronavirus - warnings do not come much starker than that. [.....] scientists [...] whose advice is heavily influential in government [...] assessed three strategies:
    Suppression - break chains of transmission, effectively trying to stop the epidemic in its tracks, and bring cases down as low as possible, as China has done
    Mitigation - accept you cannot stop the coronavirus so slow its spread and prevent a massive peak in cases that would overwhelm the NHS while trying to protect those most at risk of severe disease, which appeared to be the UK strategy last week
    Do nothing - and let the virus rip through the population
[...] The modelling projected that if the UK did nothing, 81% of people would be infected and 510,000 would die from coronavirus by August. The mitigation strategy is better, but would still result in about 250,000 deaths and completely overwhelm intensive care in the NHS (National health Service).

(My highlighting)
So cases considered include 510,000 deaths and around half that number. This is for a population of around 60 million, so a little under 1%, but with heightened mortality after that. There are also plans for potential food shortages, as the UK imports a lot of its food.

One can see from this that disaster scenario planning is not a sign of malign intent on the part of the authorities, but rather the reverse: it is a prudent measure to avert or mitigate catastrophes. No doubt people can be found who make mean or cynical remarks about who should live and who should die. I have seen remarks and reports of this nature cited in histories of WW2.

As per the other thread on this: Keep safe everyone.

User avatar
borjastick
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2676
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 5:52 am
Location: Europe

Re: Coronavirus as a public health comparison to those of Germany in Eastern territories in 1940s

Postby borjastick » 5 months 4 weeks ago (Sat Mar 28, 2020 4:45 am)

I have just been watching the news on this virus and how it has affected Germany and as I listened to the report I said to myself 'this shows the holocaust couldn't have happened'. The reason is Germany is totally in control of their virus outbreak. More testing, more planning, more systems to understand it and control things.

Thus I was feeling that this Germanic attitude to thinking ahead and planning isn't something they started last Tuesday. This is how they do things. Thus if the holocaust of six million had happened it would have been planned within an inch of its life. A system, rules and protocols, fuel supplies and systems in place to dispose of bodies etc.

I am very pleased that Germany isn't suffering too much from Coronavirus but it shows us the truth about other things...
'Of the four million Jews under Nazi control in WW2, six million died and alas only five million survived.'

'We don't need evidence, we have survivors' - israeli politician

User avatar
Sannhet
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 679
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 6:12 pm
Location: USA

Re: Coronavirus as a public health comparison to those of Germany in Eastern territories in 1940s

Postby Sannhet » 5 months 4 weeks ago (Sat Mar 28, 2020 9:41 am)

I think you are right to look for possible comparisons between this Corona Crisis and the Holocaust. I would go further still.

When the smoke clears from the present crisis, which to me bears all the hallmarks of a social panic (this may not be a popular opinion, but I submit it in good faith), there will be a lot of indirect lessons relevant to Holocaust studies / revisionism.

1.) How Do We Know What We Know. Partial data, projected data, anecdotes (someone's friend's grandmother was a victim), single pictures (people in hazmat suits), use of Big Numbers without context, and various kinds of fuzzy math. These can be selectively applied towards the creation of a narrative which is easily digestible by a popular audience.

A numbers-oriented person or another sort of skeptic, observing the same phenomena, will generally have lots of "but what abouts," which are looked upon as cruel to bring up in the face of human deaths.

2.) The role of dissenters. There are many very serious experts who question the worst-case scenarios, often revising them down drastically given fresh analyses of data. You are unlikely to have seen (m)any of these, as such experts do not control the narrative-shaping media (and what a great story this is to keep at the forefront; the ratings are great!), and are as scattered voices of dissent.

The Holocaust analogy here is that free inquiry is generally not welcome. Maybe it will return to fashion by April or May 2020, or by late year, or by next year. It's hard to say. But certainly throughout March, most media are actively waging a campaign against Corona Deniers, which inconveniently includes many top experts, such as Stanford's Dr. John Ioannidis. Other publications are actively suppressing dissident writing; Google itself is doing so. I have tested this out using various keywords in Google vs. DuckDuckGo, with the very different sorts of results.

(Incidentally, many of the top "Corona Deniers," or doomsday-skeptics warning against drastically overreacting, are themselves German public-health experts, such as Dr. Karin Mölling and Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, a public health official and SPD political figure, who is featuring in a Coronavirus-Revisionism documentary being produced in Germany now.)

3.) Actors and Reactions. I am interested in the observable roles of different groups during this crisis and the analogous groups in the early 1940s in Europe and the Holocaust. I am thinking of the roles of:

  • quasi-state-backed information services or media (today, generally all major media which is referred to as "MSM," including the influential US cable news channels, can be viewed as part of the government apparatuses of their respective countries);
  • social media (which is a digital age equivalent of the rumor mills of old, the origin point of the original gassing stories);
  • individuals' reactions separated "off social media," or what is called IRL (in the real world);
  • (theoretically) neutral international organizations;
  • national or regional governments acting formally with edicts, orders, and other policies.

A comparative analysis of reactions by each of the above, both in terms of immediate reactions to ongoing events/reports and to "narrative construction and maintenance," might be very illuminating for general lessons and new insights-by-analogy.

EtienneSC
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 573
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2011 2:27 pm

Re: Coronavirus as a public health comparison to those of Germany in Eastern territories in 1940s

Postby EtienneSC » 4 months 3 weeks ago (Wed Apr 29, 2020 12:53 pm)

Another aspect is the difficulty of mass cremation in modern crematoria. The following story is about Bergamo, Italy, from 19 March 2020:
https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-italian-army-called-in-to-carry-away-corpses-as-citys-crematorium-is-overwhelmed-11959994
The wealthy city, northeast of Milan in Italy's Lombardy region, has recorded at least 93 coronavirus-related deaths as cases continue to grow relentlessly.
The mayor of Bergamo, Giorgio Gori, said the true number of related deaths could be higher as many people with COVID-19 symptoms had died before being tested. "The crematorium of Bergamo, working at full capacity, 24 hours a day, can cremate 25 dead", said a spokesperson for the local authority. It is clear that it could not stand up to the numbers of the past few days."

Bergamo has a population of around 122,000.
https://www.euronews.com/2020/03/24/non-stop-work-and-no-protection-bergamo-s-funeral-houses-say-enough
As far as I can tell, there is more than one oven (muffle, presumably). There are usually 115 cremations per month (equivalent to around 4 per day), but in March 2020, 800 deaths in March up to around 24 March, making the crematorium three weeks behind, with bodies sent elsewhere. Bergamo is the epicentre of the infection in Lombardy, Italy.

User avatar
Hektor
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 3558
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 7:59 am

Re: Coronavirus as a public health comparison to those of Germany in Eastern territories in 1940s

Postby Hektor » 4 months 3 weeks ago (Sat May 02, 2020 10:12 pm)

Auschwitz-Birkenau was, among other things, a quarantine camp.

I think there is quite some material on this on maps and other documents.

User avatar
stinky
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 211
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2018 10:59 pm

Re: Coronavirus as a public health comparison to those of Germany in Eastern territories in 1940s

Postby stinky » 4 months 3 weeks ago (Sun May 03, 2020 6:40 am)

Great post Sannhet.
Casting a skeptical eye over the fear porn C-19 coverage by the MSM should be second nature to anyone who has already smashed through the holohoax narrative.
Similar to the fakery involved in the holohoax (goosed statistics, "witness" testimony, (kosher approved) expert opinion) we are being fed more BS, using the same old techniques.
We are expected (most do) to disengage all critical thinking when bombarded with scary looking graphs, completely contextless statistics, gross distortions and lies by omission.
It's largely manipulation through emotion - fear (look, they are burying people on hart island in NY - gasp!) which inhibits peoples ability to think logically.
For everyone here, some of which must have spent many years researching the hoax, it only takes a small amount of independent research to punch holes in the C-19 narrative.
To anyone interested, some of the best sources I have come across on this topic are;
OffGuardian https://off-guardian.org/
Swiss Propaganda Research https://swprs.org/2020/04/25/covid19-update-3/
John Rappoport https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/
Whitney Webb https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com ... tney-webb/
William Engdahl http://www.williamengdahl.com/index.php
James Corbett https://www.youtube.com/user/corbettreport/videos
And some good articles by;
Vigilant Citizen
https://vigilantcitizen.com/latestnews/ ... ter-china/
Michael Hoffman
https://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/ ... -john.html
Vanessa Beeley
https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/who-co ... 9-part-one
It's easier to fool someone than to convince them that they have been fooled

User avatar
Hektor
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 3558
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 7:59 am

Re: Coronavirus as a public health comparison to those of Germany in Eastern territories in 1940s

Postby Hektor » 4 months 4 days ago (Thu May 21, 2020 8:00 pm)

stinky wrote:Great post Sannhet.
Casting a skeptical eye over the fear porn C-19 coverage by the MSM should be second nature to anyone who has already smashed through the holohoax narrative.
Similar to the fakery involved in the holohoax (goosed statistics, "witness" testimony, (kosher approved) expert opinion) we are being fed more BS, using the same old techniques.
....

Turn it around a bit. When people are realising that they've been led astray by their governments, the "experts" and the media, they may be also more perceptive for the idea that those institutions have lied to them big time before. There is of course several things to look into:
- The change in the Coronavirus-narrative from "This isn't too bad" / "Hug a chinaman" to "This is the pandemic of the century" / "We will all die, if we don't have lockdowns!"
- The government overreach with the lockdown measures.
- The pushing for forced vaccinations (that are probably a rather sloppy product by that).
- The whole Coronoia.
- The issue that experts are obviously twitching data in an institutional way
- The salami tactics to extend lockdowns
- The name calling of Lockdown-critiques as "conpiracy theorists".

I'm sure there is more. But I sense that confidence in government and academic institutions will be shattered after the dust settles.

There is still a lot I need to make sense of. But to me it seems that some globalitarians also so an opportunity with this PANdemIC to push for issues not related to public health. Examples are forced vaccination, extended government control and the "We need a central Health Authority for this world". I don't know whether this was a naturally occurring virus, a bio-weapon or simply a new wave of diseases that aren't even viral. But I suspect there is a lot of dirty underhandedness at play. Greed, lust for power and delusions of grandeur seem to play a major role. People in that field seem to have seen a golden opportunity in this and forced a lot of measures down people's throat. The whole insanity of the nanny-state becomes visible to many. Obviously the story didn't age as well as some had hoped. The threat is far smaller than the usual suspects made it out to be (fortunately). And those responsible will have to have to do a lot of explaining for the month and years ahead. On a side note, the prosperity preachers have put the ball completely miss as well there, exposing them as the pious frauds they are. Then the stories of miracle cures discovered by Jews add some flavor to it. Global ID with vaccination records and control are spicy as well. Once the hype is gone, my guess is the economic and financial consequences will be a big issue through the middle of the decade. Things may go in a faster intervention spiral that may cause economic disasters in large part of the world. I also heard about 5G and crowd control, while 5G being blamed for the disease is suggested as well. I don't know about that I can't see that there is a connection between 5G and Covid symptoms. I suspect that danger might be overstated. What I think has merit is of course that global presence of communication networks opens whole new avenues for globalitarian governments. It will make a cashless society a possibility and cashless means government+banks will be able to control people's economic life's. Any critiques, "hate groups", "conspiracy theorists", "religious nutters" can then be shut down easily. Excluding them from most means of transacting and communicating, while the sheeple will be allowed to enjoy the "recovering economy". That will be a delusion of freedom, since many moral restraints are removed, but I suspect a lot of people will not care as long as they can enjoy pleasure they desire.

A computerized global economy will seemingly solve the problem of the socialist calculation problem. Finally this would be a synthesis of Socialism and Capitalism with a global nanny state. What's still missing from the equation is a globalist religion that can integrate the existing ones and even integrate atheists, agnostics and people that are otherwise secular. Don't know how they'll do that, but sure that's a possibility to think about. Those working in that direction may have their plans set back by the present fiasco for years to come. We will see how things work out.

User avatar
stinky
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 211
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2018 10:59 pm

Re: Coronavirus as a public health comparison to those of Germany in Eastern territories in 1940s

Postby stinky » 3 months 3 weeks ago (Tue Jun 02, 2020 8:05 am)

Remember "flatten the curve"? We had to reduce the spread of the virus to keep hospitals from being overwhelmed.
Long after this is even remotely an issue, we are slowly starting to return to normal. But not the old normal. A "new normal" with "contact tracing", forced vaccines (wait for it) increased surveillance, a smashed economy (which was well on it's way to collapse - but now with a patsy cause) mass unemployment & austerity.
But who is responsible? Nobody. C19 done it!
The economy has collapsed, because C19
We must accept austerity, because C19
Compulsory vaccines, because C19
We have to do away with cash, because C19
Avoid all physical contact, because C19
We must listen to authority & the kosher approved experts, because C19
No International travel until........... because C19
We have to shut down dangerous "fake news", because C19
and on & on........

And just about every response to the "crisis" is what our overlords have been working towards for decades.
What a cohencidence!

Those who do not see the scam now have well & truly had their critical thinking overwhelmed by the fear porn.
The cold & flu routinely kills 500,000+ globally EVERY YEAR!
What is the average age of victims again? Similar to cold & flu?
Remind me, what is the mortality rate? In the range of cold & flu?
It's easier to fool someone than to convince them that they have been fooled

User avatar
Lamprecht
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2030
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:32 pm

Re: Coronavirus as a public health comparison to those of Germany in Eastern territories in 1940s

Postby Lamprecht » 3 months 3 weeks ago (Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:51 am)

Really a pointless topic to be dwelling on now, at this point

"In Reality, The Virus No Longer Clinically Exists in Italy"
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-heal ... SKBN2370OQ

"Spain on Monday reported no official deaths from the new coronavirus in a 24-hour period for the first time since March."
https://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory ... h-70998591

Useful, albeit slightly dated resource: http://archive.is/dC0UX

Hopefully we can get back to real issues, soon. There are plenty of them
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance -- that principle is contempt prior to investigation."
— Herbert Spencer

forasanerworld
Member
Member
Posts: 118
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2019 11:37 am

Re: Coronavirus as a public health comparison to those of Germany in Eastern territories in 1940s

Postby forasanerworld » 3 months 3 weeks ago (Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:30 pm)

Lamprecht wrote:Really a pointless topic to be dwelling on now, at this point

"In Reality, The Virus No Longer Clinically Exists in Italy"
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-heal ... SKBN2370OQ

"Spain on Monday reported no official deaths from the new coronavirus in a 24-hour period for the first time since March."
https://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory ... h-70998591

Useful, albeit slightly dated resource: http://archive.is/dC0UX

Hopefully we can get back to real issues, soon. There are plenty of them


"Really a pointless topic"

I'm not sure what that meant, but my take on this "nobody knows anyone that had it but if they do they were ill anyway" virus is that it's the same "holocaust" mechanism at work and by the same players, even Bill Gates is one of what Henry Ford disclosed as referred to as one of the "millions with which we surround ourselves" which may or may not have been a conspiratorial Pof the E of Z but certainly has rela world paralllels so perhaps no conspiracy required. Numerous centres speak of the draconian control measures implicit in the current situation which could bury the main topic of this site for centuries or the same threat could result in a groundswell that sweeps the whole lot into the dustbin, neither are an easy path to follow but I know which I would prefer.

User avatar
stinky
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 211
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2018 10:59 pm

Re: Coronavirus as a public health comparison to those of Germany in Eastern territories in 1940s

Postby stinky » 3 months 3 weeks ago (Wed Jun 03, 2020 1:22 am)

Hi Lamprecht, regarding your comment that it is a pointless topic to dwell on, whether we like it of not, we may suffer some of the consequences for the rest of our lives as measures implemented in response to C19 will become permanent, not to mention the disastrous consequences from the controlled demolition of the economy - which was perhaps the main reason behind this scam.
It's easier to fool someone than to convince them that they have been fooled

User avatar
Lamprecht
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2030
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:32 pm

Re: Coronavirus as a public health comparison to those of Germany in Eastern territories in 1940s

Postby Lamprecht » 3 months 3 weeks ago (Wed Jun 03, 2020 11:46 am)

forasanerworld wrote:"Really a pointless topic"

I'm not sure what that meant

This is in response to both you and Stinky: yes, I understand that there is a massive hysteria over this virus and it has impacted all of us. That was not what I meant when I said it is a "pointless topic."

When I said it's a "pointless topic" I say it in a more general sense, regardless of people's reactions to and behavior in response to it. I don't know if either of you are American, and because of the legality of "Holocaust denial" in certain areas I am not going to ask either of you to reveal whether you live in the United States, it's besides the point. I will state that yes, I do personally live in the USA, and that is my focus in this post. If you do not live in the USA I will only ask that you pretend for a moment that you do, for the sake of my point, and if you are unfamiliar with something I bring up there's plenty of information if you Google it. I think non-Americans will find my overall message applies just as much to them as it does to those in the USA.

Dwelling on pointless topics/subjects/issues while ignoring important topics/subjects/issues is what the government and media have been doing in ideological lockstep for a very long time. That itself is an important topic/subject/issue all on its own, but I consider it a completely separate /topic/subject/issue. I will bring up a very specific illustrative example that any American here probably remembers, and others may know something about: The Trayvon Martin case. "Briefly" some 17yo Black American was shot and killed in a physical altercation with a "White hispanic" civilian. This happened in the state of Florida, and that is relevant here because the laws regarding self defense and gun rights vary considerably by US state. In the state of Florida, we have what is called a "stand your ground" self-defense law, which you can go research more into if you want but its name is straight-forward and descriptive enough for you to understand what it means.

The controlled mass media created a massive spectacle about this event to the point that every American who wasn't living under a rock knew about it. People rioted over it, friendships were probably severed in many instances. What is also of note in regards to this sooting is that the victim, Trayvon Martin, was legally a "child", despite being 17 years old and fully grown at the time, an athlete even -- in comparison to the man who shot him, middle-aged, chubby/out of shape, etc. In the USA, a "child" is just someone under the age of 18, this number is arbitrarily chosen and certainly varies considerably through time and space.
Anyway, the photographs presented of Martin on the TV screen showed a young child -- probably because the most recent photos revealed a physically matured adult male, emulating gangsta-rap thugs which routinely glorify criminal behavior in their song lyrics. It was also reported that he was walking around with skittles, a candy that is typically associated with children. Although any adult can go to the store and buy it most adults feel no compulsion to do such a thing but probably have vague memories of a strong preference for sugary candy while younger, and now consider it just tasteless junk, probably a bit too sweet to even enjoy.

What happened was the soon-to-be shooter, George Zimmerman, spotted Martin engaging in what he perceived to be a plot to engage in illegal activity (robbery). So, Zimmerman (who was armed) followed Martin (after making a phone call to the police) and somehow this resulted in a physical altercation: Zimmerman was attacked by Martin and then shot and killed him.

Now, I am not saying a life being taken is no big deal, but the USA is a very large place with a second Amendment saying we have the right to own firearms, and in this country over 300 people per day are shot. So in this context, we have an individual physically attacking someone who was armed with a gun with the end result being that he was shot and killed by the armed target. The death in this case was not unlawful: if you're attacked -- at least in the state of Florida, and some others -- you can use deadly force. There is another similar case in Georgia that is more recent, and the Black man was actually caught on camera physically attacking another civilian who was visibly armed with a gun. The Trayvon Martin case was not video recorded.

The Wikipedia page is exceptionally lengthy, sporting over 400 citations, and has images showing the bloody face of the shooter, confirming that he was indeed in a violent confrontation (with someone far more athletic/agile than himself who could easily have fled) prior to his use of the firearm:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shooting_ ... von_Martin

There was trial to determine if the homicide was itself illegal -- again, the law in Florida stipulates that you can kill in self defense if there threat of death or great bodily harm, you have no duty to flee or lay there and take it - which in some places, as perverse as it sounds, that is what would be considered the only lawful behavior in this instance.

This trial, which had an obvious verdict from the outset, was televised on many news TV stations. This is an extraordinarily rare occurrence in general, and especially for such a clear-cut self-defense case. And after the trial verdict came out and it was determined that, yes, it was a case of legitimate self defense and there was no crime committed in the process of Trayvon Martin being shot and killed, additional riots took place. and the mass media didn't shut up about it for weeks after. The president at the time - Barrack Obama, who is half-Black - declared publicly "If I had a son, he'd look like Trayvon"

So no crime was committed, it was a simple case of "man with a gun is attacked, uses it and lawfully kills his attacker in self defense."
Period, end of story. What more is there to talk about? This was determined within hours of the shooting. But the story dragged on forever and it was a central subject of focus in the mainstream news media for a very long time.

I think i dwelled on this specific (off-topic) example more than enough to illustrated my point. Ordinary things which happen all the time, or things which should not be treated as national news headlines, are treated as such: and THAT is the salient issue here. Buried deep in this completely inane event there is an important lesson: the media does use emotional exploitation in order to convince the public to expend time and energy on things that otherwise are rather objectively "pointless" to dwell on.

There is an aphorism: Man bites dog. What this means is that an unusual event (in this case, a man biting a dog, in stark contrast to the reverse: a dog biting a man) will be considered more newsworthy than something usual, ordinary, average, not especially meaningful. This remains true even if two events have comparable significance or impact on our lives.

Do you pay to read mainstream news articles? Do you pay to go on YouTube or wherever and watch the mainstream news channels tell you what supposedly is taking place? Probably not, it's free. It is "free" for all of us to use despite the massive quantity of resources being poured into providing it. That alone should indicate that the product here is you: your mind, your beliefs, ideas, passions, dreams and concerns. Do you want legal or medical advice? Go pay a lawyer or doctor for their time, even if you have medical insurance the doctor is getting paid for his time spent with you. But the mainstream news? That's completely free for the most part.

And it becomes quite obvious in a democratic society why so much effort and resources would be poured into elevating the perceived significance of non-issues in the general public while simultaneously ignoring other things which are actually more important. I will let you decide for yourself what is more important than the things we are told to worry about. However, I would myself offer the idea that this entire system in which a small number of individuals are able to determine what millions of people deem to be significant is exceptionally exploitable under any and all circumstances conceivable. Also, the particular nature and motives of these arbiters of public opinion in the real world is incredibly important as well. And that should be discussed at length, with extremely careful consideration given into deciding (assuming such power exists) who exactly is chosen to make these decisions. Of course, that it not happening for the most obvious reason imaginable.

I will just wrap this up by sharing this video where someone else explains it much more succinctly than I could ever hope to:



This subject has been understood and deliberated long before you or I were ever born. It's very important but most people don't think about it in this way. This novel coronavirus is probably nothing you should personally worry about in regards to your own health - and if you are one of hte few who should worry about it, then there are many other additional things you should also be worried about that wouldn't matter to most people However, if the media or the government decide to use "Coronavirus" as an excuse to implement policies you find disagreeable, then yes that is something to worry about. But their ability to take non-issues and beat you over the head with them and force you to do things you wouldn't otherwise do is a completely separate issue from the particular non-issue they have used as a prop.

I hope that's clear enough :)
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance -- that principle is contempt prior to investigation."
— Herbert Spencer

User avatar
stinky
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 211
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2018 10:59 pm

Re: Coronavirus as a public health comparison to those of Germany in Eastern territories in 1940s

Postby stinky » 3 months 3 weeks ago (Thu Jun 04, 2020 2:44 am)

Thanks for taking the time to write a comprehensive, detailed response Lamprecht.
I understand the concept of the major media (and let's not forget, it's really the (((media))) shaping people's reality.
Hyping nonsense or "pointless topics" to get people arguing with each other and/or shift public opinion.
Telling people what they should be sympathetic to & what to be outraged by, cultivating a particular narrative for ulterior motives.
And by omission, rendering issues of significance 'non events'.

Getting back to the C19 specifically, here's what it's consequences may look like, if people like Alan Dershowitz have any say;

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_cont ... e=emb_logo
It's easier to fool someone than to convince them that they have been fooled

User avatar
Lamprecht
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2030
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:32 pm

Re: Coronavirus as a public health comparison to those of Germany in Eastern territories in 1940s

Postby Lamprecht » 2 months 4 weeks ago (Sat Jun 27, 2020 9:34 pm)

Edit: This "John 'not remotely jewish' Ziegler" guy really doesn't like this "Dr. Levin" for some reason... :lol:


In case it gets deleted: https://youtube.com/watch?v=L98OyepXgHE or https://bitchute.com/video/L98OyepXgHE/



Hey guys, make sure you don't engage in "Coronavirus Anti-Semitism" which I guess is a real thing now.

Image

THE FAR-RIGHT NETWORK BEHIND CORONAVIRUS ANTI-SEMITISM
http://archive.fo/Y1OjF or https://web.archive.org/web/20200627050 ... ission.pdf


Cleveland Jewish News:
"Far-right activists and white supremacists have used the coronavirus pandemic to spread anti-Semitic rhetoric and conspiracy theories, according to a report released this month by the American Jewish Congress." http://archive.fo/QPugI

Times of Israel:
"As the infectious disease — with no vaccine or specific cure — has spread across the globe, a new conspiracy theory has been brewing on the fringes of society: The Jews are behind it. According to Alex Friedfeld, a researcher with the Anti-Defamation League’s (ADL) Center on Extremism, extremists began promulgating the notion in January that the coronavirus was created by a cabal of Jews, around the time the virus was first being detected." http://archive.fo/s0xFm

Jewish Press:
"Everyone – and with good reason – is preoccupied with the Wuhan virus, aka coronavirus, aka the 'Kung Flu,' perhaps the most serious pandemic in the lives of most contemporary Americans. However, another significant international infectious pandemic – one for which, sadly, no effective vaccine has ever been developed – has received little attention: anti-Semitism. Not surprisingly, anti-Semites have begun to crawl out of their mudholes spreading their latest conspiracy theory: that 'the Jews' spread the Wuhan virus for personal financial gain." http://archive.fo/35mln

Jewish News Syndicate:
"Rise of Coronavirus Correlates to Rise in Antisemitism, Especially in Heavily Jewish Areas of New York and New Jersey ... 'Since the beginning of March 2020, we have been receiving disturbing information on accusations on Jews, Zionists and Israelis, as individuals and as a collective, for causing and spreading the coronavirus,' noted a report on global antisemitism issued Monday by the Kantor Center for the Study of Contemporary European Jewry at Tel Aviv University and the European Jewish Congress." http://archive.fo/qJbwh

The Yeshiva World:
"Strasbourg, France: A Majority Of Jewish Community Of 20K Infected, Anti-Semitism Rising, Chief Rabbi Says" http://archive.fo/hX7nk

Jerusalem Post (April 29, 2020):
"A bipartisan group of 28 US senators on Monday sent a letter to the Senate Appropriations Committee’s Subcommittee on State, Foreign Operations and Related Programs, and asked to increase funding for the State Department’s Office of the Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Antisemitism." http://archive.fo/ID6Nn

Jewish Journal:
"U.N. Rapporteur 'Extremely Concerned' About Rising Anti-Semitism During Coronavirus Pandemic" http://archive.fo/y1zlu

Haaretz:
"'Jews Control Chinese Labs That Created Coronavirus': White Supremacists’ Dangerous New Conspiracy Theory. Far right theories on a Jewish-Chinese COVID-19 cabal are breaking out of the infamously anti-Semitic dark web – with real-world consequences" http://archive.fo/2WEbx

Memri:
"Hitler's Propaganda Minister Goebbels Would 'Like' Today's Social Media – And Would Use It To Blame The Jews For The Coronavirus" http://archive.fo/S8RC1

WSJ:
"Coronavirus Sparks Rise in Anti-Semitic Sentiment... far-right groups, ultraconservative Christian circles, Islamists and the far left have sought to link Jews to Covid-19." http://archive.fo/I72sP

Jerusalem Post:
"The Holocaust and the coronavirus ... the corona era appears to have spawned a new wave of global antisemitism, and we need to be vigilant against blood libels blaming Jews for the current plague, as well as to prevent attacks against Jewish institutions." http://archive.fo/6FHiW

Richard Silverstein:
"Israel Is Militarizing and Monetizing the COVID-19 Pandemic. Coronavirus is ravaging the globe right now. It’s a perfect time for the Israeli state to figure out how to expand its already vast surveillance powers." http://archive.fo/rX8oN

Open Democracy:
"An anti-Semitic wave may hit the world in the aftermath of the pandemic ... A search on Twitter for the words “Jewish” and “coronavirus” from March 20th to April 3rd 2020 revealed the existence of ten different types of anti-Semitic conspiracy theories that have been associating the COVID19 with the Jewish community." http://archive.fo/XIW4G

Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs:
"Stopping the Viral Epidemic of Anti-Semitism in the United States. Scientists and doctors are working feverishly to fight the COVID-19 plague around the world. Their tools include quarantines, intubation, and the search for a vaccine. But flourishing simultaneously is another dangerous virus – a social one — called anti-Semitism. If history is an indicator, the financial and economic disasters that await the world are the ideal Petri dishes for that virus’ exponential growth." http://archive.fo/1czrs
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance -- that principle is contempt prior to investigation."
— Herbert Spencer

User avatar
stinky
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 211
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2018 10:59 pm

Re: Coronavirus as a public health comparison to those of Germany in Eastern territories in 1940s

Postby stinky » 2 months 3 weeks ago (Sun Jun 28, 2020 7:22 am)

Great clip :lol:

Regarding the theme of the links you posted, It follows the same old pattern - (((they))) never let an (invented) crisis go to waste
It's easier to fool someone than to convince them that they have been fooled


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Lamprecht and 9 guests