WHY DID THE NAZIS FORGET TO COVERUP THE HOLOCAUST?

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
Messenger
Member
Member
Posts: 35
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 5:32 pm

WHY DID THE NAZIS FORGET TO COVERUP THE HOLOCAUST?

Postby Messenger » 1 decade 5 years ago (Thu Aug 26, 2004 7:17 pm)

THE HOLOCAUST. WHY NO COVER-UP?

We are told that the Germans transported millions of Jews, often for hundreds of miles, to Auschwitz, and other death camps in Poland. The transportation of so many, required thousands of individual train journeys, and tied up valuable rail resources, that were desperately needed to transport troops and munitions to supply the war effort. Why would people just interested in killing Jews do this? Why risk losing the war to kill Jews. Win the war first, kill the Jews second.

So why were the Jews not killed were they where?

We are told that the Germans transported the Jews, these hundreds of miles, in order to hide their crimes. At Auschwitz, they could cremate the bodies and leave no evidence of genocide. According to the holocaust legend, the Germans were willing to waste hundreds of thousands of tons of coal to cremate the bodies of these millions of Jews. This was coal that would otherwise have been been available for use in the gasification plant at Auschwitz III (Monowitz) for the production of gasoline, at a time when Germany was running desperately short of gasoline. As crazy as this sounds, we are told that the Germans were willing to lose the war, as long as they killed Jews.

So the Germans went to great expense to cover-up their killing of the Jews.

We are told that in order to cover-up, the Jews were transported hundreds of miles and mountains of coal were used to cremate their bodies. All this, to hide any evidence of genocide.

Now, if the Germans went to such lengths to cover-up, then:

Why did the Germans not destroy the concentration camp records?

For example, the Auschwitz death books were not destroyed, but found by the Soviets at Auschwitz, when they took control of the camp at the end of January 1945. Neither were the volumes that recorded deaths at the other concentration camps destroyed. In fact, they provide the truth about what happened at these camps.

Why did the Germans not make the concentration camps "just disappear"?

It would have been a simple task to torch the mainly wooden buildings and truck away the brick and stone that remained. In fact, if the Germans were guilty of genocide, they would have killed every last witness, every last prisoner, and had every camp totally obliterated, leaving only ashes.

We are meant to believe that the Germans went to huge expense to transport the Jews to Auschwitz where the killings could be covered up, but then later, forgot to shred the camp records and somehow forgot to remove the main evidence of wrong-doing, the prisoners of the camps, and the camps themselves.

With no starving prisoners, with no corpses from the epidemics that killed thousands, there would have been no atrocity photos to "prove" genocide in the eyes of the world. With no victims, no crime scene, very few witnesses, and tens of millions already missing due to the fighting, those killed would have been lost in the fog of war. It would have been difficult to establish those killed were not killed elsewhere, or just displaced, let alone that they had been killed in an act of genocide.

But with the photos from Bergen-Belsen (where no one any longer claims there were even gas chambers) the press was able to fraudulently "prove" mass killings and genocide. When it was conclusively established that there were no mass killings at Bergen-Belsen, the focus moved to Auschwitz, and other camps in the Soviet block, were verification of the various claims was impossible.

War crimes of the United States worse than those of the Germans.

It should be mentioned that the internment of the Jews, was little different than the internment of the Japanese and other foreign nationals by the United States (the United States interned foreign nationals before the Germans interned the Jews). War crimes were committed by both sides. Both sides bombed enemy cities full of civilians, although the Americans and British were master criminals in this regard.

It should also be noted that the Germans refused to use the lethal nerve gases Sarin and Tabun that they had developed before the war, even though this could have won the war for Germany. At the end of the war, the Germans had a stock-pile of some 12,500 tonnes (technically, enough to kill everyone on the planet a few thousand times over). By comparison, in 1997, the United States had stock-piled some 28,573 tonnes (31,496 tons) of lethal chemical weapons.

One has to contrast this against the action of the United States, which after developing nuclear weapons, immediately used them on civilian targets.

So from a German perspective, what they had done was no more evil, and arguably less evil, than what the United States itself had done.

In summary, the Germans made no attempt to cover-up their crimes, for the simple reason that they did not believe that they had committed any crime that necessitated a cover-up.

TRUTHATLAST
Member
Member
Posts: 76
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2004 10:05 pm
Location: LOST IN SPACE

Postby TRUTHATLAST » 1 decade 5 years ago (Sat Aug 28, 2004 9:24 am)

How do I top that!

Messenger
Member
Member
Posts: 35
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 5:32 pm

Postby Messenger » 1 decade 5 years ago (Fri Sep 03, 2004 8:49 pm)

TRUTHATLAST wrote:How do I top that!

I was quite impressed with this article as well.

Messenger
Member
Member
Posts: 35
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 5:32 pm

Postby Messenger » 1 decade 5 years ago (Tue Sep 14, 2004 8:24 pm)

I think that some people here should pretend to be Jews and come up with responses to the above questions.

User avatar
neocon
Member
Member
Posts: 84
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2004 5:49 pm
Location: Germany

Pretending...

Postby neocon » 1 decade 5 years ago (Wed Sep 15, 2004 4:02 am)

Pretending to be a jew/believer:

They dismantled Treblinka in a way you described like removing
every brick and stuff.

There are real fotos of Belzec where you can see the ripped-off
railway tracks.

The official death records of Auschwitz were not removed, because
only the official deaths were in them. The genocidal deaths were
not registered, but sent to the gas chamber directly.

The amount of coal needed for cremation has to be viewed
relative to the amount of coal <hrm> used by all 80 million
Germans to heat their homes during the winter. how much
coal does one person need to heat their home for 1 week and
is that amount sufficient to cremate that person. I guess it's not
such a war-deciding issue.

<believermode off>

Did I do well ? I Can't remember anything I said.

User avatar
ClaudiaRothenbach
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 569
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2004 2:16 pm

Krege

Postby ClaudiaRothenbach » 1 decade 5 years ago (Wed Sep 15, 2004 12:21 pm)

They dismantled Treblinka in a way you described like removing
every brick and stuff.


As Richard Krege proved via ground penetrating radar the Germans even put every grain of clay, silt, sand, and gravel of the 800,000 body mass grave into place again. They really put a lot of effort into giving revisionist arguments to insult wretched Jews.

Messenger
Member
Member
Posts: 35
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 5:32 pm

Re: Pretending...

Postby Messenger » 1 decade 5 years ago (Sat Sep 25, 2004 12:14 am)

neocon wrote:They dismantled Treblinka in a way you described like removing
every brick and stuff.

Actually, as far as can to ascertained, Treblinka never existed as a concentration camp.

War photographs show a small transit camp, but no large concentration camp.


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests