On the recent purges by big tech media companies

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
User avatar
Lamprecht
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2031
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:32 pm

On the recent purges by big tech media companies

Postby Lamprecht » 2 months 3 weeks ago (Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:50 pm)

Over the past few days, various large YouTube accounts and subreddits have been banned, ostensibly for "Hate speech."
The primary motive here really appears to be an attempt to censor large online personalities that the election-meddlers believe helped Trump get elected. This will continue to spread, and it won't be only pro-Trump individuals, but anyone else whose opinions are declared "hate speech."



On YouTube they banned David Duke, American Renaissance, and even Stefan Molyneux. Molyneux had over 1 million subscribers and claimed to have the "Largest philosophy show in the world." Well, he had the largest YouTube account that labeled itself a "Philosophy" show. Curiously, a few days ago Stefan put up a YouTube post claiming that he was going to have an interview with Andrew Mathis. I commented about it, but the post is obviously gone now. I am not surprised that David Duke and Amren were removed (it was just a matter of time) but with Stefan, it's just shocking. I don't even think anyone has been able to point to any specific videos that were "hate speech" to justify the ban.

"YouTube and Reddit Put Their Foot Down, Ban Far-Right Content
...The video platform banned six accounts in total for hate speech on June 29... YouTube claims to have banned over 25,000 accounts for hate speech... Reddit also banned over 2,000 far-right and white-supremacist subreddits after implementing a hate speech policy on June 29..."

http://archive.is/JKtlH

YouTube's CEO is Jewish. I am not sure about Reddit, but one of the co-founders was Jewish and another recently stepped down, demanding to be replaced by someone Black. Like Twitter, I am sure that they allow the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) to define "Hate speech" for them.

The ADL, a hate group led by racist Jews, is currently leading a censorship campaign against Facebook and other big tech companies; it very likely played the decisive role in these coordinated bannings. In this "Stop hate for profit" campaign, the ADL is demanding that Facebook (owned by Jew Mark Zuckerberg) censor anyone deemed "racist" by the ADL. The ADL has been whining to Zuckerberg to ban all "Holocaust denial" (as was done on YouTube, Reddit's AskHistorians subreddit, and elsewhere) but Zuckerberg has refused, to his credit. I'm not quite sure if that will last much longer though...


25 June 2020:
"Anti-Defamation League sends letter to advertisers, urging them to boycott Facebook" http://archive.is/vcoAk

The 3-page letter: http://web.archive.org/web/202006302241 ... letter.pdf


Haaretz (25 June 2020):
"Ben & Jerry’s Joins ADL-led Campaign to Boycott Facebook Advertising. The campaign, which was announced last week, is being spearheaded by the Anti-Defamation League, NAACP and several other civil rights groups. http://archive.is/5slQr


Nick Statt (27 June 2020):
"Coca-Cola joins Facebook boycott with a pause on all social media advertising starting July 1st
Honda and Hershey also part of the growing backlash against Facebook and other platforms
The move is part of a broader boycott of Facebook and Instagram organized by the Anti-Defamation League, the NAACP, and other organizations called the “Stop Hate For Profit” campaign. Coca-Cola is going one step further than some of those companies and banning all ads globally on social media platforms, not just Facebook and Instagram. That would suggest the boycott will hit Twitter, YouTube, and other platforms as well."
http://archive.is/l0QRy

NPR (29 June 2020):
"Facebook Boycott Grows: Ford Joins Coca-Cola, Starbucks And Other Brands... Another major brand, Pepsi, is reportedly weighing a similar move, following Starbucks, Coca-Cola, Unilever and dozens of other brands shifting their ad dollars away from Facebook. The brands said they are standing up against hate speech." http://archive.is/iffz1
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance -- that principle is contempt prior to investigation."
— Herbert Spencer

User avatar
HMSendeavour
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 400
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2018 3:12 pm
Contact:

Re: On the recent purges by big tech media companies

Postby HMSendeavour » 2 months 3 weeks ago (Wed Jul 01, 2020 6:49 am)

A much larger picture is forming, hopefully in the minds of those who didn't see it coming before. All of this, and which I am about to post about, is no surprise to me. Nor should it be to anyone else who isn't totally oblivious to the anti-white agenda.

Academic journals have been pulling down articles, scholars have been "fired" for racism and anti-white genocidal maniacs promoted to professorships.

Noah Carl was fired from Cambridge over a year ago: https://archive.vn/CsaZ6

And only recently have Cambridge promoted a non-white whom called for the genocide of white people:
EbWirkNUcAEg3rL.jpg
promoted.PNG
antiwhite.PNG
(Archive: https://archive.vn/I9Ob9)

And of course, Cambridge themselves lied and stated that they "defend the right" of their academics "to express their own lawful opinions which others might find controversial" :
cambridge.PNG
https://archive.vn/MYdid

This is of course untrue, as they fired Noah Carl and took away the visiting fellowship of someone as milquetoast as Jordan Peterson: https://archive.vn/MYdid

Another academic, Steven Hsu was forced to resign from Michigan State University: https://archive.vn/aPHB1, https://archive.vn/alOWD, https://archive.vn/T5ba6 ,https://archive.vn/ptxzX https://archive.vn/BEYSH,

An academic paper which showed that religion has a negative impact on crime in low IQ countries was pulled: https://archive.vn/A2xXV, https://archive.vn/1uwAu

The academic paper "RUSHTON AND TEMPLER (2012): DO PIGMENTATION AND THE MELANOCORTIN SYSTEM MODULATE AGGRESSION AND SEXUALITY IN HUMANS AS THEY DO IN OTHER ANIMALS?" was also retracted due to pressure, here's an archive of it: https://sci-hub.tw/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.02.015

And social media giants such as twitter ban anything considered "right wing" while promoting, or at least, not prosecuting in the same way, left wingers who dox, call for violence, genocide etc. https://archive.vn/qHwku

And and internet register is threatening to ban websites which promote anti-immigration and or any kind of pro-white viewpoint: https://archive.vn/jFvBa

Academics with "PhD" in their bios, have no moral scruples in simply dismissing, not debating studies that do not fit their preconceived social agendas. Such people behave like Communists, if they aren't already Marxists explicitly, they are acting Marxists, whether they know it or not. Specifically because these studies are related to race differences, or even just biological difference between individual humans, these Lysenkoists demand censorship for such findings. They cannot fathom the possibility that they could be wrong, the evidence be DAMNED. They're not scientists, nor are they academic. Academica serves one purpose, to indoctrinate and disseminate politically filtered propaganda. These strongs words of mine cannot be denied, the evidence, which is available for all to see, sits uncomfortably right in front of your face:

Academic 1
1.PNG


Academic 2
2.PNG


These are only two examples. Many more can be found.

Continuing:

A twitter thread on the rubbish claim that tech giants can ban whoever they want because they're "private companies": https://archive.vn/CCTAz the short version, is that, no they cannot, everyone is forced to use or interact with these giant companies because they're monolithic, hence they cannot and should not be (if they are) be allowed to ban people or politically sabotage views they do not like.

A Major Washington Post editor exposes her hatred of white people: https://archive.vn/VjavT

The Governor of Kentucky want to insure healthcare for every black person in the state, no whites of course. Oregon is passing health regulations that will force white people to wear facemasks and allow non-whites not to wear them: https://archive.vn/A7Gep

The City of St.Louis will be trying to criminalize people who defend their property and their own physical wellbeing from the hordes of racial grievance mongers:

Ebw6l6xWoAEzI4J.jpg


And it goes on and on and on. I myself was actually banned on Bitchute. Nowhere is safe.

banned on bitchute.PNG


Not surprisingly to me, Adolf Hitler prophetically spoke out against these very same things, in such a way that you cannot help but draw countless parallels to our modern day.

Now what does it mean for the independent expert witness Van Pelt? In his eyes he had two possibilities. Either to confirm the Holocaust story, or to go insane. - Germar Rudolf, 13th IHR Conference

User avatar
Lamprecht
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2031
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:32 pm

Re: On the recent purges by big tech media companies

Postby Lamprecht » 2 months 3 weeks ago (Wed Jul 01, 2020 9:12 am)

HMS:
And it goes on and on and on. I myself was actually banned on Bitchute. Nowhere is safe.

If you don't mind me asking, doing what? I have seen stuff on Bitchute that would be considered "Hate speech" and banned just about anywhere else. I think it would have to be something illegal in the US. Was it copyrighted?

I noticed that you can backup bitchute videos on the wayback machine, as long as they aren't large enough.

For example, this recently posted video on CODOH's Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/video/7K7oVc6hHH6T/
I just submitted it to the archive, it may take a day or two to show up (some manual submissions have been doing this for a while, it's an issue they are trying to fix). You can easily get the full URL from a bitchute video. For this, the one I got was https://seed132.bitchute.com/lvlh76IW8F ... 6hHH6T.mp4

Just view the page source and search for <source src= - you will want this underlined part:
<source src="https://seed132.bitchute.com/lvlh76IW8FPZ/7K7oVc6hHH6T.mp4" type="video/mp4" />

You can archive that separately, although again: very large filesizes probably won't work. There are also many cloud platforms online where you can upload directly with a URL.

HMS:
Academic journals have been pulling down articles

Is there a list of the articles that have been pulled down for "hate speech"? They establisbhment has been pulling down / retracting things for a while, even things completely unrelated to "Hate speech" - for example:
Why Fish Oil Fails: A Comprehensive 21st Century Lipids-Based Physiologic Analysis
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3914521/

The real reason was that the author sold some health supplements on his website and that was seen as a "Conflicting interest" for someone and they can't write articles to be published about how Fish Oil is not a good supplement to take. Really, it's one of the top 5 most common taken supplements in the USA in general (although this may have changed recently from people upping certain other supplements responding to COVID) so there are strong financial interests, but it's not "bigotry" or "prejudice" or able to hurt 99.9% of people's feelings. They really are just gatekeepers. (More on "Fish Oil" for anyone interested, as it's an off-topic subject: https://functionalps.com/blog/2011/11/2 ... -toxicity/ )

Also:
"Most scientists 'can't replicate studies by their peers' ... Science is facing a 'reproducibility crisis' where more than two-thirds of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce another scientist's experiments, research suggests." http://archive.is/iOMZd

Holocaust Revisionists know all about that, but they are prevented from actually trying to replicate the studies (see: viewtopic.php?t=9171) whereas in this case the scientists have the tools but can't actually get the same results.

Also recommended:
[Video] The Authoritarian View of Knowledge: Peer Review
viewtopic.php?t=12612



I also have found this list of banned YouTube channels, From https://theredelephants.com/recent-yout ... find-them/
Here is a list of the top channels affected:

Banned and Where to Find Them

Stefan Molyneux
Jared Taylor
Iconoclast
Nick Fuentes
Red Ice TV
Brother Nathaneal
James Allsup
Gavin McInnes
Lift the Veil
Colin Flaherty
Owen Benjamin
The Ralph Retort
Patrick Slattery
Soph
Cultured Thug
Xurious
YouKipper
The Great Order
Varg
Radix Radio


Demonetized or Videos Deleted

Know More News
Andy Warski
Deep Fat Fried Podcast
Jesse Lee Peterson
Tailed Feature
Mister Metokur
Ford Fischer
Dan Dicks
Revenge Of The Cis
Martin Sellner
Steven Crowder
SinatraSays
Dr Shaym
Jake Morphonios of Blackstone Intel
The Red Elephants
E;R
Ryan Dawson
E Michael Jones
The Higherside Chats
Bre Faucheux
Count Dankula
Angelo John Gage
Milo
Black Pigeon Speaks
Drunken Peasants
Press For Truth
J.F Gariepy
Way of the World
CODOH is not on the list but I could try and see if it can be added.
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance -- that principle is contempt prior to investigation."
— Herbert Spencer

User avatar
HMSendeavour
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 400
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2018 3:12 pm
Contact:

Re: On the recent purges by big tech media companies

Postby HMSendeavour » 2 months 3 weeks ago (Wed Jul 01, 2020 9:54 am)

Lamprecht wrote:HMS:
And it goes on and on and on. I myself was actually banned on Bitchute. Nowhere is safe.

If you don't mind me asking, doing what? I have seen stuff on Bitchute that would be considered "Hate speech" and banned just about anywhere else. I think it would have to be something illegal in the US. Was it copyrighted?


If i'd done anything I shouldn't have, I wouldn't make a big deal about it, it's because I only ever uploaded content that was appropriate and already abundant that I am upset by it.

I uploaded much of the same content which is shared by multiple people on Bitchute, content that had many more views that mine. Documentaries, clips, those really well done rediting of Hitler speeches, content that I save from being obliterated by the youtube space from various content creators. Just good videos that I thought were worth archiving. Nothing copyrighted that I know of, nothing violent, nothing of that nature. I had a good couple hundred subscribers and about 500 videos or so. It was going very well. But then they deleted my channel and claimed that i'd receive an automatic email regarding the reasons why I'd been banned. I never received an email. Nor did I receive, even after repeated inquiry emails, a response from them or anyone from the bitchute team whatsoever. I even tweeted at them.

It's a sham. Anyway. Here's another video:



I cut this portion from this video:

Now what does it mean for the independent expert witness Van Pelt? In his eyes he had two possibilities. Either to confirm the Holocaust story, or to go insane. - Germar Rudolf, 13th IHR Conference

User avatar
Archie
Member
Member
Posts: 107
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2020 12:44 am

Re: On the recent purges by big tech media companies

Postby Archie » 2 months 3 weeks ago (Wed Jul 01, 2020 7:29 pm)

At first glance, it's odd that they are targeting Facebook. I mean, what's even left on Facebook to censor? All the serious right wing stuff got removed ages ago. I doubt Facebook will be hurt by this and my gut tells me Zuckerberg is probably in on the scheme. I suspect it's intended more as a threat to other platforms so they will be more compliant next time the ADL sends them a list of stuff to ban.

Revisionist stuff is always the very first to go. It's priority number 1 for them.

When will Archive.org and wayback machine be in their crosshairs?

User avatar
Lamprecht
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2031
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:32 pm

Re: On the recent purges by big tech media companies

Postby Lamprecht » 2 months 3 weeks ago (Wed Jul 01, 2020 7:57 pm)

Archie wrote:When will Archive.org and wayback machine be in their crosshairs?

It's on somebody's crosshairs...

Activists rally to save Internet Archive as lawsuit threatens site - The non-profit removed lending restrictions on over a million books during the COVID-19 crisis. Now it's being sued by publishers.
http://web.archive.org/web/2020/https:/ ... -threatens or http://archive.is/oh5ls
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance -- that principle is contempt prior to investigation."
— Herbert Spencer

User avatar
Lamprecht
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2031
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:32 pm

Re: On the recent purges by big tech media companies

Postby Lamprecht » 2 months 3 weeks ago (Wed Jul 01, 2020 10:08 pm)

Well this is something. The ADL is openly admitting their driving role...
How the ADL went from working with Facebook to leading a boycott against it.
Jewish Telegraphic Agency
1 July 2020 | By Ben Sales

(JTA) — It was when Mark Zuckerberg said he would allow Holocaust denial on his platform that the Anti-Defamation League realized its partnership with Facebook wasn’t working.

The social media giant and the Jewish civil rights group had been working together for years to curb hate speech online. In October 2017, Facebook headlined a new ADL initiative to start a Cyberhate Problem-Solving Lab in collaboration with Silicon Valley’s biggest companies.

Then, nine months later, Zuckerberg told the tech site Recode that while he personally found Holocaust denial “deeply offensive,” he said, “I don’t believe that our platform should take that down because I think there are things that different people get wrong.”

People who monitor anti-Semitism criticized Zuckerberg for what they saw as undeservedly giving anti-Semites the benefit of the doubt — as if they were making an innocent mistake rather than propagating a deliberate lie. That’s when the ADL realized that Facebook wasn’t going to change on its own and needed to be pressured.

“Holocaust denial is something that we’ve been talking to Facebook about for I think it’s 11 years at this point,” Daniel Kelley, associate director of the ADL’s Center for Technology and Society, told the Jewish Telegraphic Agency. “We’ve told them Holocaust denial is hate. It is not misinformation. And they have not only not changed, but in several instances doubled down on treating Holocaust denial as some form of misinformation.”

So the ADL has changed tacks as Facebook, according to ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblatt, “has allowed some of the worst elements of society into our homes and our lives.”
[...]

Full article: http://archive.is/ocIup or http://web.archive.org/web/100/https:// ... against-it

Facebook has already meddled in US elections with their biased news algorithms and "fact checking" silliness.

You can get banned for a lot of things, but not "Holocaust denial" which I have noticed is proliferating in any open debate group that will tolerate it. Possibly won't last much longer on there.

Not even TikTok will be safe:
TikTok riddled with antisemitism and Holocaust denial

Report from researchers at Haifa University and Israel’s Institute for Counter Terrorism found the social media platform is abused for spreading hate.

By JTA | June 29, 2020, 12:00 am

THE popular TikTok video-sharing service is being used for more than just awkward dances by users, according to a new study in Israel.

Antisemites, Holocaust deniers and other far-right extremists are going on the social media platform to reach young people, researchers from the University of Haifa and Israel’s Institute for Counter Terrorism found in a report titled “Spreading Hate on TikTok.”
[...]

http://archive.is/58Ddj or http://web.archive.org/web/2020/https:/ ... st-denial/
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance -- that principle is contempt prior to investigation."
— Herbert Spencer

User avatar
stinky
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 213
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2018 10:59 pm

Re: On the recent purges by big tech media companies

Postby stinky » 2 months 3 weeks ago (Thu Jul 02, 2020 7:34 am)

Facebook is engaged in the same game that Apple played with 'privacy'.
Facebook is in a very public conflict regarding pressure to limit certain content. In due course, as planned, Facebook will comply, giving the appearance that it resisted in the interests of it's users, until it fell under the increasing weight of opposition.
Just the same as the very public conflict some time ago where Apple appeared to be resisting (on behalf of it's customers) US authorities' request to attain back door access to Apple phones. Apple couldn't publicly say it allows backdoor access to the NSA, just the same as Facebook can't appear to capitulate to increasing demands to limit/remove certain content. But it will, as it already has. Just as YouTube & Amazon have incrementally banned/removed content. The screws will continue to be turned.
It's all a show.
It's easier to fool someone than to convince them that they have been fooled

User avatar
Lamprecht
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2031
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:32 pm

Re: On the recent purges by big tech media companies

Postby Lamprecht » 2 months 3 weeks ago (Thu Jul 02, 2020 9:28 am)

Another victim, this time all his Youtube videos removed but no ban. AltHype / Alternative Hypothesis / Ryan Faulk / People's Veto -- whatever you want to call him.

He has a Bitchute channel with all of his videos though: https://bitchute.com/channel/thealthype/

A lot of videos on AltCensored also: https://altcensored.com/channel/UC2w1CQ ... 4-PCg2UvJQ
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance -- that principle is contempt prior to investigation."
— Herbert Spencer

User avatar
Lamprecht
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2031
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:32 pm

Re: On the recent purges by big tech media companies

Postby Lamprecht » 2 months 3 weeks ago (Thu Jul 02, 2020 12:05 pm)

Zuckerberg says that Facebook isn't going to change its policies on so-called "hate speech." On Facebook, people get banned all the time for posting so-called "hate speech" - although there is no rule against "Holocaust denial" per se.

Image
http://archive.is/0ve8T



Another article showing the ADL's role in this recent mass-banning of subreddits:
Reddit Just Banned Every Anti-Capitalist, Pro-White Subreddit

June 30, 2020

On Monday, the news came down that Reddit had banned several prominent political communities, including /r/The_Donald and /r/ChapoTrapHouse.

/r/The_Donald has been one of the left’s top censorship targets for years- along with Stefan Molyneux’s YouTube channel, which was also axed Monday.

This latest round of web censorship reveals the lie that is a “terms of service violation”: no matter how thoroughly you moderate your community or temper your rhetoric, once you’re on the Anti-Defamation League’s hit list, it’s only a matter of time before your right to speak is snuffed out.

The ADL had /r/The_Donald’s number since at least 2016. Molyneux’s YouTube career was liquidated after being targeted by the ADL’s “Stop Hate For Profit” campaign. My YouTube channel was terminated just days after I was put on an ADL hit list.

And, of course, Reddit CEO Steve Huffman is on the board of the ADL’s Center For Technology and Society.

Reddit has done their best to keep the full list of censored subreddits a secret, only publishing the names of the ten most active communities banned.

/r/ChapoTrapHouse and /r/cumtown are included in the subreddits they admit to banning. Both are affiliated with anti-capitalist leftist podcasts.

Also included in the admitted ban list: /r/consumeproduct, a subreddit that satirized consumer culture and unchecked corporate power.

Image
The list of subreddits Reddit admitted to banning on Monday.

This list has been archived here.

We know from the targeted subreddits that the “Silicon Valley coastal elites and financiers” aren’t just interested in stopping OUR PRESIDENT DONALDUS J. TRUMP’s KAGA RE-ELECTION. They’re fine with nominally populist, anti-capitalist, or anti-elite sentiments so long as they control them. If there’s a risk of that populist, anti-capitalist, anti-elite sentiment being directed away from Red Team Blue Team partisan politics and towards a meaningful alternative, they will mobilize to shut it down.

This top ten list only tells part of the story. Huffman and his partners at the ADL aren’t going to give you the full list of the “2,000+” banned subreddits. Thankfully, Reddit users were able to identify many of the banned subreddits, which can be found here (and is archived here.)

In addition to the aforementioned subreddits, these political boards were also banned:

  • /r/The3rdPosition
  • /r/DebateAltRight
  • /r/ShitNeoconsSay
  • /r/CampusConservative
  • /r/WhichWayWesternMan
  • /r/shabbosgoys
  • /r/TheNewRight
  • /r/WhiteRightsUK

This probably isn’t shocking news to you- Reddit has routinely axed pro-white political communities for years. This round of bannings, however, went even further, targeting communities dedicated to sharing and compiling inconvenient information:

  • /r/HateCrimeHoaxes
  • /r/DiversityNews
  • /r/HBD
  • /r/polfacts
  • /r/blackcrimestatistics
  • /r/holocaustrevision
  • /r/ReallyWoodenDoors
  • /r/Holodomor
  • /r/WhitePillCafe

Banned meme & humor subreddits include:

  • /r/charlsworld
  • /r/basedyesguy
  • /r/WeWuzKangz
  • /r/rightwingcomics
  • /r/BalkanPeopleInternet
  • /r/topnotchshitposting
  • /r/wojak
  • /r/classic4chan
  • /r/OpieAndAnthony

In a move that should surprise no one familiar with the show’s subject material and origins, /r/BanBigMouth was also terminated.

Subreddits did not have to be political in order to get banned, either. Huffman, Reddit, and the ADL claim were “spreading hate” include:

  • /r/Traditionalist
  • /r/whitebeauty
  • /r/whitebeautyart

Suggesting that some white people are beautiful is a revolutionary act that makes you a Nazi. Exploiting economically insecure white women to create pornography is cool, though- just ask /r/CamGirls and their 43,500 members.

The biggest lesson to be learned here: censorship isn’t about breaking the guidelines, following the terms of service, or doing the right optics. It’s not about supporting or not supporting Trump, either.

Left, right, or radically moderate third positionist: if the ADL wants you gone, you’re gone.
http://archive.fo/FmnXS
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance -- that principle is contempt prior to investigation."
— Herbert Spencer

User avatar
Hektor
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 3558
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 7:59 am

Re: On the recent purges by big tech media companies

Postby Hektor » 2 months 3 weeks ago (Fri Jul 03, 2020 5:39 pm)

I see Steven Anderson has also been banned - or rather had most of his channel deleted:
https://www.youtube.com/user/sanderson1611/videos
This comes after he was preaching against the BLM-pogroms.

Here is why he's notable to this forum:
https://archive.org/details/PastorSteve ... allyHappen

EtienneSC
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 574
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2011 2:27 pm

Re: On the recent purges by big tech media companies

Postby EtienneSC » 2 months 3 weeks ago (Sat Jul 04, 2020 3:49 pm)

Lamprecht wrote:Over the past few days, various large YouTube accounts and subreddits have been banned, ostensibly for "Hate speech."

[.....] On YouTube they banned David Duke, American Renaissance, and even Stefan Molyneux. Molyneux had over 1 million subscribers and claimed to have the "Largest philosophy show in the world." Well, he had the largest YouTube account that labeled itself a "Philosophy" show. Curiously, a few days ago Stefan put up a YouTube post claiming that he was going to have an interview with Andrew Mathis. I commented about it, but the post is obviously gone now.

The Molyneux / Mathis debate happened on Bitchute:

There was nothing about the Holocaust in it, aside from an opening mention of Andrew Mathis as co-founder of the Holocaust Controversies blog and a couple of passing mentions of "the Nazis" (e.g. 1.34.00) as avatars of evil. Andrew Mathis argued that you couldn't get people to work under feudalism without feeding them well (45.00), which conflicts with the idea of the Germans "working people to death" in labour camps.

It was interesting to see Andrew Mathis in person. He came across as someone getting old and grey, but still passing his time preaching hippy ideals to youngsters on university campuses. He sat in front of empty bookshelves in a black T-shirt, called himself an "anarcho-syndicalist", disliked the British Empire and advocated reading Marx and Chomsky (who defended revisionist Robert Faurisson's right to publish). Marx would likely have called him a utopian socialist. He has begun to study history, having a background in English Literature, but apparently still more in the mode of memorising stirring stories, rather than in the way of critical investigation. He was not an ill-intentioned man, by his own lights, on my reading of him.

User avatar
Lamprecht
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2031
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:32 pm

JTA: ADL decided to turn against Facebook because Zuckerberg won't ban "Holocaust denial"

Postby Lamprecht » 2 months 3 weeks ago (Sat Jul 04, 2020 5:46 pm)

Mathis does appear to be a rabid marxist. It's unfortunate Stefan didn't ask him if he supports freedom of speech, such as on the Holocaust.

More news about the ongoing censorship & social media boycott -- ADL decided to turn against Facebook because Zuckerberg won't ban "Holocaust denial"
How the ADL went from working with Facebook to leading a boycott against it

By Ben Sales, JTA | July 1, 2020

It was when Mark Zuckerberg said he would allow Holocaust denial on his platform that the Anti-Defamation League realized its partnership with Facebook wasn’t working.

The social media giant and the Jewish civil rights group had been working together for years to curb hate speech online. In October 2017, Facebook headlined a new ADL initiative to start a Cyberhate Problem-Solving Lab in collaboration with Silicon Valley’s biggest companies.
...
http://archive.is/t7kSk
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance -- that principle is contempt prior to investigation."
— Herbert Spencer

User avatar
HMSendeavour
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 400
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2018 3:12 pm
Contact:

Re: On the recent purges by big tech media companies

Postby HMSendeavour » 2 months 3 weeks ago (Sat Jul 04, 2020 10:24 pm)

EtienneSC wrote:It was interesting to see Andrew Mathis in person. He came across as someone getting old and grey, but still passing his time preaching hippy ideals to youngsters on university campuses. He sat in front of empty bookshelves in a black T-shirt, called himself an "anarcho-syndicalist", disliked the British Empire and advocated reading Marx and Chomsky (who defended revisionist Robert Faurisson's right to publish). Marx would likely have called him a utopian socialist. He has begun to study history, having a background in English Literature, but apparently still more in the mode of memorising stirring stories, rather than in the way of critical investigation. He was not an ill-intentioned man, by his own lights, on my reading of him.


These people all manage to look like decrepit old fools, unshaven Communists, hypocritical and oblivious to their ideologies connection to mass slaughter. They fixation with the Holocaust is nothing more than for these Marxists to divert attention away from the crimes which have stemmed from Marx, to uphold the universal standard against the Germans. They would like to persecute revisionists and Nationalists on the basis that we somehow condone the Holocaust, because of course these people believe that we know it was "truth" but just deny it. All in an effort to avoid moral responsibility for the Marxist ideology they espouse, which they're more than happy to revise. These people cannot be taken seriously, either as historians or good faith actors.
Now what does it mean for the independent expert witness Van Pelt? In his eyes he had two possibilities. Either to confirm the Holocaust story, or to go insane. - Germar Rudolf, 13th IHR Conference

Atigun
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 500
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:13 am

Re: On the recent purges by big tech media companies

Postby Atigun » 2 months 3 weeks ago (Sun Jul 05, 2020 12:31 am)

I think that the recent banning/demonetization can be boiled down to the old and hackneyed Jew phrase, "Oy vey! The goyim know. Shut it down!" As with all stereotypes and sayings, it's based on fact.


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Daniel Briske and 5 guests