On the recent purges by big tech media companies

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
User avatar
borjastick
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2676
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 5:52 am
Location: Europe

Re: On the recent purges by big tech media companies

Postby borjastick » 2 months 3 weeks ago (Sun Jul 05, 2020 1:36 am)

Notice how Mathis interrupts all the time, wants to change the topic and generally disrupts. That is how these angry jews do it. The inveigle, they disrupt, they cause trouble. He is well known for being an angry and aggressive man. He cannot handle the reality of the holocaust as opposed to the fantasy holocaust he and his fellow angry jews want. They love the idea that 6m jews were killed. Forget de-monetisation these people would be de-legitimised as and when the truth about the holocaust is generally accepted.
'Of the four million Jews under Nazi control in WW2, six million died and alas only five million survived.'

'We don't need evidence, we have survivors' - israeli politician

User avatar
Lamprecht
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2030
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:32 pm

Re: On the recent purges by big tech media companies

Postby Lamprecht » 2 months 2 weeks ago (Sun Jul 05, 2020 5:09 pm)

French-born comedian Dieudonné Mbala Mbala had his YouTube account removed as well. http://archive.fo/Uw48N

Image

Dieudonné, pictured above, is a "Holocaust denier" which means he is a "white supremacist neo-nazi" that hates all non-Whites due to a personal distaste for their skin pigmentation levels.
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance -- that principle is contempt prior to investigation."
— Herbert Spencer

Breker
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 822
Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 5:39 pm
Location: Europa

Re: On the recent purges by big tech media companies

Postby Breker » 2 months 2 weeks ago (Sun Jul 05, 2020 6:14 pm)

Recall that this Mr. Mathis has been shown up at this forum on numerous occasions.
Communism must be his latest effort at making a fool of himself.
A glutton for punishment we guess.
B.
Revisionists are just the messengers, the impossibility of the "Holocaust" narrative is the message.

User avatar
Lamprecht
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2030
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:32 pm

Stefan Molyneux banned from Twitter one week after his YouTube ban // ADL's censorship, hate, extortion, and racketeerin

Postby Lamprecht » 2 months 2 weeks ago (Wed Jul 08, 2020 5:28 pm)

Stefan Molyneux has also been banned from Twitter. Here is the essay he was going to post: https://www.freedomain.com/2020/07/07/w ... -molyneux/

So about 1 week after Youtube banned Molyneux for "hate speech" he was banned from Twitter for the same reason. His YouTube channel (the biggest YouTube philosophy channel) had over 1 million subscribers and nearly 300 million views; all of this despite YouTube demonizing his account, suppressing his videos in the search results, and randomly unsubscribing users. His Twitter had nearly half a million subscribers just before the ban.

It's pretty straightforward; Molyneux is called a "racist" for claiming that there are median group differences in IQ [and other traits] due, at least partially, to variations in allele frequencies between races and ethnicites. His channel had a numerous interviews of experts as well as video debates on the subject. There is also a wealth of published information on this with experiments spanning over a century.

Molyneux does not publicly "Deny the Holocaust" - but he lives in Canada which has, in the past, had prosecuted people for such things, calling it "incitement to hatred" or "false news." I can't read his mind, but from his perspective he would have gained nothing for doing so if he did actually deny it. Molyneux claims to be an "Anarcho Capitalist" so a free market with pretty much no government. I don't think that could easily be obtained and if it did, it wouldn't last too long, but this can also a strategy to deflect the "neo-Nazi" and "White nationalist" labels. I'm sure he would be 100x more satisfied with just small government (Libertarian, Minarchism) over what we have now. He is of course totally in favor of free speech and would oppose any "hate speech" laws, including "Holocaust denial" - both on principle and because he would be targeted also. As for the Third Reich, he can use the "Holocaust" propaganda to justify his argument for small government, but he focuses mostly on atrocities committed by communists. He claims to not be Jewish, but one of his family members along time ago remarried a Jew. All-in-all it wouldn't help him push his message and it's just a very complex topic he wouldn't want to get tripped-up on.

What's really happening here is that the "hate speech" allegation means nothing more than that the accuser hates the person's arguments. And who is in charge of what constitutes "hate speech"? The primary driving force appears to be the ADL (Anti-Defamation League) and other [disproportionately Jewish] organizations supporting them.

The ADL is an unregistered Israeli espionage & hate group that illegally lobbies the US government on behalf of a foreign government.

The ADL is engaged in a criminal conspiracy of extortion against advertisers. Anyone that refuses to join the ADL will be labeled a "racism" supporter. It is obvious racketeering and blackmail linked to a foreign power, yet it is not investigated by any 3-letter government agencies.

Their goal is to get rid of free speech on the internet and prevent Trump's reelection. The US Second Amendment right to own firearms is also being attacked and has been for decades: that's because the two go hand-in-hand. Trump supports these liberties but his political opponents do not.

Recently, these subversives met with Facebook to demand they comply with their demands and ban everyone they dislike. Facebook refuses to ban 'Holocaust denial' (despite being owned by a Jew) although it bans virtually anything else considered 'hate speech'. It seems Facebook snubbed them, from CNN
Facebook ad boycott organizers met with Zuckerberg. It didn't go well
By Brian Fung, CNN Business
Wed July 8, 2020

Civil rights and activist groups blasted Facebook’s leadership on Tuesday after meeting with CEO Mark Zuckerberg and other executives to discuss the demands of a large advertiser boycott that now includes hundreds of brands.

“The meeting we just left was a disappointment,” said Rashad Robinson, the president of Color of Change. “[Facebook] showed up to the meeting expecting an ‘A’ for attendance.”
[...]
The meeting on Tuesday lasted for a little over an hour, and was conducted via Zoom, said Jonathan Greenblatt, CEO of the Anti-Defamation League. The meeting included Zuckerberg, COO Sheryl Sandberg, chief product officer Chris Cox, and members of the Facebook policy team, he said.
[...]
The protest came after Facebook decided not to take action on a series of controversial posts from President Donald Trump — including one during racial justice protests that said “looting” would lead to “shooting.” Facebook and Zuckerberg came under pressure from employees and politicians, but the ad boycott represented a more direct potential threat to the social network’s core business.
http://archive.fo/tPJ2R or http://web.archive.org/web/202007072249 ... index.html

This is just the beginning. What is going on now is that the ADL (as well as other Israeli/Jewish companies/organizations) are developing the infrastructure to find "hate speech" online using AI so that they can find it and demand its removal. Having Trump lose this election would help them achieve this goal more quickly, but only a fool would believe that it would end there. They want complete control on what ideas the masses are allowed to hear.

Honestly, I think it's 50/50 that Bitchute will even last the entire election cycle.
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance -- that principle is contempt prior to investigation."
— Herbert Spencer

User avatar
Lamprecht
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2030
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:32 pm

Big tech monopolies collude together to censor "hate speech"

Postby Lamprecht » 2 months 2 weeks ago (Wed Jul 08, 2020 6:08 pm)

The inventor of the World Wide Web, Tim Berners-Lee called for their regulation back in March 2018: http://archive.is/kDXS0

According to polls, most Americans agree: http://archive.is/29o4X and viewtopic.php?p=94112#p94112


These big tech monopolies collude together all the time in these "Hate speech" bannings. For example, Alex Jones:
Andrew Anglin & the Daily Stormer is another example: They have gone through so many domain names I think eventually they will have used every TDL. There was a graph that was posted before with the amount of time each TLD survived, I cannot find it though. This is more than a banning from a "private" website: but having your domain name taken from you.

VDare was also threatened to have their domain taken from them last month: http://archive.is/G4Bqb

It happened to Stormfront as well back in August 2017, but I guess they got it back.

It simply is not a coincidence that Google/Youtube, Twitter, Reddit, Facebook, Apple, Vimeo, and major web hosts just happened to have banned certain individuals and groups within hours of one another.

More:
Trump claims 'collusion' between big tech and Democrats, backs antitrust fines - Initially asked if he thought the tech giants should be broken up, Trump said, "Well, I can tell you they discriminate against me."
http://archive.is/r9vSv or http://web.archive.org/web/201906101642 ... s-n1015726
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance -- that principle is contempt prior to investigation."
— Herbert Spencer

User avatar
JLAD Prove Me Wrong
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 431
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2018 8:35 pm

Re: On the recent purges by big tech media companies

Postby JLAD Prove Me Wrong » 2 months 2 weeks ago (Wed Jul 08, 2020 6:58 pm)

Even if I dislike a person, banning them from Twitter or Facebook is wrong. They have just as much right to talk as you or I do.

In related news, Pastor Steven Anderson was banned. He made a revisionist film.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCq7Bdm ... XrwOgMhN5w

https://archive.org/details/PastorSteve ... allyHappen
If your beliefs cannot stand up to your own sincere scrutiny and skeptical evaluation, they are not worth having.

https://freespeechmonika.wordpress.com/ ... t-details/

User avatar
Lamprecht
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2030
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:32 pm

Re: On the recent purges by big tech media companies

Postby Lamprecht » 2 months 2 weeks ago (Wed Jul 08, 2020 7:35 pm)

Chinese-owned TikTok may also be completely banned after claims it was spreading "Holocaust denial" to teenagers, despite "Holocaust denial" banned from the platform months earlier. From:

TikTok: Chinese video-sharing app may be banned in USA after "study" claims "Holocaust deniers target" children
viewtopic.php?t=13360
Lamprecht wrote:8 July 2020 - Secretary of State Mike Pompeo:
"China experts expect TikTok ban 'by end of this week' as pressure mounts on Trump administration" https://foxnews.com/media/trump-adminis ... tiktok-ban or http://archive.is/n8LyB

8 July 2020 - VOA News:
"TikTok to Leave Hong Kong over New Security Law" http://archive.is/lrZov

29 June 2020 - Australian Jewish News:
"TikTok riddled with antisemitism and Holocaust denial: Report from researchers at Haifa University and Israel’s Institute for Counter Terrorism found the social media platform is abused for spreading hate." http://archive.is/58Ddj

26 June 2020 - Forbes:
"Apple Suddenly Catches TikTok Secretly Spying On Millions Of iPhone Users" http://archive.is/5YEgY

22 June 2020 - Times of Israel:
"Study: TikTok app used to aim anti-Semitism, Holocaust denial at youngsters" http://archive.is/lKIsR

23 June 2020 - Jewish Telegraphic Agency:
TikTok Social Media Platform Users Target Young People with anti-Semitism and Holocaust Denial, Study Finds http://archive.is/IPKvK

8 January 2020 - TikTok banned "Holocaust Denial" viewtopic.php?p=97349#p97349
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance -- that principle is contempt prior to investigation."
— Herbert Spencer

User avatar
Lamprecht
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2030
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:32 pm

Re: On the recent purges by big tech media companies

Postby Lamprecht » 2 months 1 week ago (Wed Jul 15, 2020 9:26 am)

Former pickup artist-turned Christian "Roosh" has been banned from YouTube despite no strikes or rule-breaking. He has declared that a partnership with the ADL is responsible for this.

His statement can be found on his blog:
https://rooshv.com/youtube-banned-me-now-what

On Monday, July 13, YouTube terminated both my main channel and Roosh Hour Clips channel, deleting all my videos even though I did not have any existing community strikes. They also deleted all my personal favorites and playlists.

Since I don’t glorify violence against any group, I presume I was banned for “encouraging hatred” (i.e. speaking the truth) about sodomites who groom children and those who worship in the synagogues of Satan. It seems that my coded means to discuss the current purveyors of evil was not enough to keep my account in good standing, and so I was banned like many other dissidents before me, including Alex Jones, Nick Fuentes, Owen Benjamin, E. Michael Jones, Rick Wiles (TruNews), Gavin McInnes, Stefan Molyneux, and David Icke.

Last night on DLive I discussed my thoughts about the banning

When I originally joined YouTube, I never had to self-censor myself. I could say whatever I wanted as long as I didn’t promote violence. Once YouTube started partnering with Jewish groups such as the ADL, speech for everyone on the platform was progressively curtailed. Who is to say that won’t happen to another platform that today advertises “free speech”? Chinese-owned DLive seems fine now, but no one can make any guarantees of its future direction. Therefore I will not spend several years building myself up on a site that will arbitrarily cancel me.

From this point on, I intend to take the path of an e-hermit. I will hunker down onto my own domain and forum and host as much content as I can, including videos. There are dozens of cloud providers for video self-hosting instead of the two or three video platforms. Even if I get banned from every cloud provider in existence, I will simply rent dedicated servers from one of hundreds of hosting companies and serve videos that way. It will be significantly harder for them to stop me now.

It’s clear to me that we are only at the beginning of an aggressive censorship campaign. While it proceeds, I will get cozy on my own domains and continue creating content. My audience will get smaller, and my influence will surely shrink, but for those who have ears to hear what I have to say, let them hear.

BitChute has been touted as an alternative but people are now complaining that they are censoring videos in certain countries if their government complains to them. There is no official statement about it and understandably they want to keep it quiet, since the whole point of BitChute is that it's supposed to be an alternative to YouTube without censorship of so called "hate speech" (speech the ADL hates).

BitChute is hosted on Cloudfare and [registered by] Epik, but both of them have previously banned people for "hate speech." Also, hosting so many videos must be extremely expensive for BitChute and I can't imagine how they could manage to maintain this indefinitely.

A big issue with any website that acknowledges the existence of "hate speech" is that nobody really knows what does or doesn't fall under the label. With YouTube it seems to be completely arbitrary with those being banned often confused about the reasons why. If they specified precisely what fell under that banner then a lot of content creators would probably self-censor so as to not cross that line. Without a specific list of ideas that constitute "hate" there will just be more random bannings that don't seem to have any connection beyond being hated by the ADL.
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance -- that principle is contempt prior to investigation."
— Herbert Spencer

david2923
Member
Member
Posts: 62
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2019 12:16 am

Re: On the recent purges by big tech media companies

Postby david2923 » 2 months 1 week ago (Wed Jul 15, 2020 11:27 pm)

Bit Chute this week took away the ability to post files to the comment section of a video
Water came down instead of the gas :drunken:

Breker
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 822
Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 5:39 pm
Location: Europa

Re: On the recent purges by big tech media companies

Postby Breker » 2 months 1 week ago (Thu Jul 16, 2020 1:40 am)

The brilliant Mr. Lamprecht said:
A big issue with any website that acknowledges the existence of "hate speech" is that nobody really knows what does or doesn't fall under the label. With YouTube it seems to be completely arbitrary with those being banned often confused about the reasons why. If they specified precisely what fell under that banner then a lot of content creators would probably self-censor so as to not cross that line. Without a specific list of ideas that constitute "hate" there will just be more random bannings that don't seem to have any connection beyond being hated by the ADL.

Whatever supremacist Jews such as the ADL consider to be "anti-semitic" or detrimental to their interests is a basic definition of "hate speech".
anti-semitic:
any thought or person that a Jew doesn't like
Holocaust, Hate Speech & Were the Germans so Stupid?
Text:
http://codoh.com/library/document/1530/
Video, while it lasts:

B.
Revisionists are just the messengers, the impossibility of the "Holocaust" narrative is the message.

david2923
Member
Member
Posts: 62
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2019 12:16 am

Re: On the recent purges by big tech media companies

Postby david2923 » 2 months 1 week ago (Sat Jul 18, 2020 3:45 am)

Even ZeroHedge is getting in on the censorship. I merely wrote the word "Jew" in the posting and it was deleted
Water came down instead of the gas :drunken:

User avatar
Archie
Member
Member
Posts: 106
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2020 12:44 am

Re: On the recent purges by big tech media companies

Postby Archie » 2 months 6 days ago (Sun Jul 19, 2020 11:50 pm)

Keith Woods recently interviewed Andrew Joyce on censorship. Joyce is an Irishman with a PhD in history. He writes primarily on "the JQ" with most of his writing appearing at Occidental Observer and Occidental Quarterly. He is trying to start up a podcast but he was banned from Spreaker before he even really started. He's also been banned from Twitter numerous times. He's going to be posting stuff to Bitchute for lack of other options even though that's not ideal as a podcast platform.



Also of interest is that Joyce makes a brief comment on the holocaust which strongly suggests he's a non-believer, although he doesn't detail his exact position. This is around 47:40 to around 49:15. He mentions the pogroms and says they were about "99% hoax." He follows up saying, "Then you have hoax number two, the Holocaust narrative being disseminated left, right, and center." Perhaps he's said something previously but this is the first time that I'm aware of. He has a very good essay on the Russian "pogroms" wherein he argues (relying on prestigious establishment sources) that the details of the pogroms were wildly exaggerated and mostly mythical and that Jews spread this misinformation intentionally for their own benefit, primarily to generate sympathy for Jews hoping to migrate to Western Europe and America. Yet he did not draw the obvious parallel to the holocaust. Kevin MacDonald (editor of Occidental Quarterly and Observer) never talks about it either and doesn't allow any holocaust revisionism in either publication. I remember one time hearing Luke Ford argue that the case for revisionism must not be very strong because a lot of the smartest right-wingers like MacDonald and Joyce aren't holocaust revisionists.

https://www.unz.com/article/myth-and-the-russian-pogroms/
https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2012/03/17/the-limerick-pogrom-creating-jewish-victimhood/

User avatar
Lamprecht
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2030
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:32 pm

Twitter bans 7,000 accounts and limits 150,000 others because of "QAnon"

Postby Lamprecht » 2 months 3 days ago (Wed Jul 22, 2020 4:35 pm)

More mass bannings by Twitter:

Twitter bans 7,000 QAnon accounts, limits 150,000 others as part of broad crackdown
http://archive.fo/uJZc9 or http://web.archive.org/web/202007220020 ... s-n1234541

It really is quite evident that this is about censoring Donald Trump supporters before the election. Three years were wasted trying to prove that Russians somehow got Trump elected, but the "Election meddling" is right here in plain sight, they're not even trying to hide it!

QAnon is an anonymous poster (or group) that has uses the name "Q" on anonymous message boards 4chan and/or 8chan, claiming to be someone in the government with access to classified information. They are pro-Trump and post supposed secret revelations about the deep state and other such things, sometimes accusing famous people of being part of a pedophile ring or whatever. This "Q" has posted all sorts of things, I don't really pay attention to it.

Naturally, QAnon is called a "Conspiracy theory" by the mass media, but it's hard to tell if the people that promote QAnon memes and such actually believe everything said by him/them or is just pretending to.

Image

I guess posting something like this on Twitter could get you banned. It's a benign image that plenty of average Trump supporters would post.

An official Tweet from "Twitter Safety" also stated that they will:
"Block URLs associated with QAnon from being shared on Twitter"
https://twitter.com/TwitterSafety/statu ... 9828897795

What does that even mean? Anything they want it to mean.
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance -- that principle is contempt prior to investigation."
— Herbert Spencer

User avatar
Lamprecht
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2030
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:32 pm

Google had a "technical issue" that removed results for conservative & alternative news sources

Postby Lamprecht » 2 months 3 days ago (Wed Jul 22, 2020 7:21 pm)

So Google, the #1 most accessed website in the world, accidentally had a "Glitch" for a few hours wherein multiple websites that they coincidentally disagree with on ideological grounds were removed from the search results. There is nothing to see here, it's all just a weird coincidence. There is no system at Google to turn off access to certain information, and this wasn't a test run to see if people would even notice. To even suggest that this is related to censorship would be a "Conspiracy theory" and all conspiracy theories are "hate speech."
And if something is declared "Hate speech" by the trustworthy people at Google, then you probably should not be allowed to hear it at all. Remember: Democracy does not work correctly unless we give wealthy and powerful elites the ability to decide which ideas we are allowed to hear. :roll:

Here's an article from RT describing this totally unpredictable and unexplainable glitch. Beware though, RT is owned by Russia, the same country that "Meddled" in the US election (the worst thing you can do apart from a Holocaust) so Donald Trump (1/2 Russian agent + 1/2 Hitler) could get elected:
Google excluded major conservative and alt-media outlets from its search results for hours, hiding hits for sites like Breitbart and RedState even in searches for the outlets’ names – only to mysteriously revert to normal later.

Conservative sites were in a panic Tuesday morning, reporting they seemed to have been blacklisted from Google. Articles and pages published by PJ Media, Daily Caller, The Blaze, and many other sites were absent even from searches for the publication name, replaced by links to Wikipedia and other sites talking about the outlet in question – usually negatively.

While most of the affected sites hailed from the right side of the political spectrum, leftist sites whose views don’t conform to prevailing orthodoxy also appeared to fall victim to the purge. Mediaite’s Charlie Nash posted a screenshot of a Google search for “MintPress News” that included no hits from the left-leaning antiwar outlet, while another commenter noted Occupy Democrats was MIA.

Perhaps realizing that simply returning the news sites to their rightful place in search results wouldn’t silence critics, Google later released a statement acknowledging “an issue that impacted some navigational and site: operator searches.” However, they denied any “particular sites or political ideologies” were targeted.

Project Veritas, one of the sites affected by the search blackout, interviewed a Google whistleblower last year who revealed the company has multiple “blacklists” for both YouTube and regular web search, one of which includes many of the sites that went missing on Tuesday.

As November’s elections loom, Google and other tech firms are likely scrambling to prevent a rerun of 2016. With 88 percent of US search engine market share, Google’s results will figure heavily in the information American voters can access in the next few months.
https://rt.com/news/495445-google-hides ... -alt-news/

That last paragraph is an example of the sort of hate speech that nobody should be allowed to hear. It's important for voters to have nice and trustworthy oligarchs in charge that can stifle the people asking inconvenient questions and thinking dangerous thoughts before such thoughts can spread to other people. What ocurred was just totally random, a hiccup, the sort of thing that happens for absolutely no reason at all. Just forget about it :P
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance -- that principle is contempt prior to investigation."
— Herbert Spencer

david2923
Member
Member
Posts: 62
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2019 12:16 am

Re: On the recent purges by big tech media companies

Postby david2923 » 2 months 3 days ago (Thu Jul 23, 2020 12:32 am)

just throwing this out there.
Yahoo News, which post items about the Hoax from time to time, has suspended the comments
Water came down instead of the gas :drunken:


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests