gl0spana wrote:no i left cuz you guys kept 'disapproving' my posts
couldn't take the heat i presume
So I would like to dedicate this thread to Gl0spana, and give my final reply to him/her.
You claimed that we revisionists "couldn't take the heat". Now I understand that this comment is likely just bait, and not a particularly serious comment.
But you must realise, that in the future, anyone who desires to look at this forum will see your comments, they will see how you responded and how you refused to provide evidence because you were "too lazy":
gl0spana wrote:I don't know how to prove this to you, sorry there won't be answer here, too lazy unfortunately
Is this the kind of "heat" you're talking about?
From your comments in other threads this appears to be the case although you try and fail to parrot the revisionist position, and sprinkle in absurdities. Either out of ignorance, or mockery:
gl0spana wrote:The exterminationist argument is much simpler. Use the able bodied as productive labor, dispose of the rest, since they are a resource drain on the German war effort as it moves into its most critical and dangerous stage yet, and yet cannot be counted on for much production.
BTW I should say I am not an exterminationist. In my historiography - which I know I cannot prove right now - the Jews were never even put in the ghettos . . . .
You claim, in the same paragraph, as seen above, two contradictory standpoints. That you believe in the exterminationist position, and then claim to be a revisionist, but make an absurd claim about Jews not being put into ghettos, which you cannot and did not substantiate.
You claimed in another thread:
gl0spana wrote:I am just getting into revisionism so I'm not sure about the various strains of thought in this subject, but from what I've gathered there are two main ones.
So are you a revisionist who has a "historiography" or are you "just getting into revisionism"?
Whether you believe in the Holocaust narrative or not (and it's pretty obvious that you do), your actions on this forum have only gone to show that you're an incompetent liar. If you purpose was to try and make revisionists look "silly" then you have failed miserably, the only person who comes out of this looking silly, and worse, disingenuous, is you. You have also not done any service to the sceptical reader as to the legitimacy of the Holocaust narrative you believe in.
It would be hilarious to me if you were some sort of Jew, or at least philo-semite (which is probably the case) who thought you could, based on strawmanned preconceptions - wiggle your way into the revisionist fray in an attempt to challenge and try to breakdown what you considered to be a weak revisionist position that you really had no idea about. In your mind, as with most believers, Holocaust Revisionists believe a vast array of kooky nonsense, and the orthodox narrative being "true" is a much simpler and less convoluted explanation. This is of course, what you yourself have said The best example of this failed tactic is this thread: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=13317&p=96983#p96983 where you operate under the assumption, thinking we're stupid, that the Holocaust is some big elaborate wire pulling "conspiracy". Because moron believers think we're just "conspiracy theorists" - and this is something you believed, so you took on this line, thinking it would work and expose something about us that you could use to confirm how "crazy" we are. Needless to say, it failed miserably for you. So you tried another tactic:
gl0spana wrote:Perhaps I jump to conclusions in calling most of you white nationalists or Nazi sympathizers or anti-semites but come on lets be honest . . . look at your avatar lol
With this ridiculous attempt at muddying the waters, you attempted an appeal to conventional morality, you tried to invalidate anyone who may well identify as any of these things, by appealing to public sentiment that "Nazis Sympathizers, anti-semites and white nationalists" cannot be trusted. Because you know full well that anyone who is any of these things will not be taken seriously on the validity of their reasoning/evidence/arguments, but instead dismissed merely by virtue of their political position. Just because you find it abhorrent, or the general public finds it as such, is not a reason to dismiss it, or to not bother trying to understand why people like this, would think and act as they do. You were made a fool of, by using this ad hominem tactic: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=13317&start=15#p97400 which will, for future readers, address just this strawman argument to those who seek to understand more about revisionism. So really, you have done us a favour.
Here is another thread, where Gl0spana made erroneous implications: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=13315 particularly using the method of claiming what we revisionists just dismiss any document we don't like as "fraudulent".
Gl0spana never brought evidence to the table in any of his discussions. A cursory look through his posting history is enough to prove that much.
He never desired the truth, he never once presented an argument of his own, and never in good faith. Another lying scoundrel has made his way onto the forum underestimating the revisionist position. Gl0spana will not be memory holed, as he can potentially act as a warning to further rabble rousers who would like to do better than him. Although, anyone seeking to cause trouble sticks out like a sore thumb.
Better luck next time Gl0spana. You're welcome to comment and discuss with any of us, in any thread, at any time, and you will be treated fairly with dignity and respect as long as you do the same. When you no longer want to act surreptitiously, and present your views/evidence honestly, it will be received with open arms.