Germany cites Holocaust in new ethnic exemption to COVID entry restrictions: Jews can enter freely; others remain banned

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
User avatar
Sannhet
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 679
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 6:12 pm
Location: USA

Germany cites Holocaust in new ethnic exemption to COVID entry restrictions: Jews can enter freely; others remain banned

Postby Sannhet » 1 week 4 days ago (Sun Sep 13, 2020 1:07 am)

Those reading this in 2020 know well that worldwide travel has been highly disrupted this year. The six months up to this writing (March to September) have seen unprecedented disruptions to life, with travel bans introduced and still in force in many places. (Australia, in its winter season embracing the Panic hard now, introduced a bizarre "exit ban" set to last up to one year, reminiscent of communist regimes of old.)

Countries began pulling the Panic trigger over a flu virus in March. Once pulled, the Panic trigger turned into a Pandora trigger. Here we are. As of this writing, Americans remain banned from Germany in general. And to my knowledge, movement of people has never been this restricted in peacetime in the post-1945 world. The last time anything like these conditions prevailed in the West was...1945.

Something happened this past week which shows just how much the Holocaust is the controlling narrative in Germany. A concrete example to demonstrate the general truth; it is a case of the "Holocaust civic cult" shows itself stronger than the "Virus civic cult."

Here is the story. It is almost too surreal to believe. (I'd readily believe it a parody which anti-Semites came up with: "Germany, terrified of virus, bans 98% of the world outside the EU from entry! Green-lights entry by Jews only.")

COVID-19 | EU | Schengen | Germany
Jewish Immigrants Can Now Enter Germany Despite COVID-19 Entry Restrictions
September 7, 2020 | ShengenVisaInfo.com
Jewish immigrants who for months now have been unable to enter Germany due to the EU-wide entry ban on third-country nationals introduced amid the Coronavirus outbreak, will now be permitted to travel to the country under the travel ban exemption for humanitarian reasons.

On September 2, the Federal Minister of the Interior, Building and Home Affairs Horst Seehofer decided to remove entry restrictions for Jewish immigrants, who mainly come from Ukraine and Russia, enabling them to enter
“[...] the federal government has agreed to extend the exemption for immigrants for humanitarian reasons to include Jewish immigrants,” a press release of the Ministry reads.
[T]he decision has been taken due to...the background of historical responsibility for the crimes of National Socialism.
Of course!
The decision has been welcomed by the Central Council of Jews in Germany, which the point of contact for politics at the federal and state level for all issues that affect the Jewish community.

According to Josef Schuster, the President of the Council, many Jews from the Ukraine and Russia have asked the Council to notify the Federal Government of Germany on the difficulties they were facing to enter Germany, despite having taken all necessary steps to obtain the required visa.

“We are very relieved that the federal government reacted quickly and did not let the Jewish immigrants stand in front of the closed door,” President Cobbler said regarding the decision of the Ministry.
Since Germany started easing entry requirements for non-Germans and non-EU citizens, only a narrow list of categories of third-country citizens can enter the country
One of these select countries is Australia, an inclusion which must be someone in the German Foreign Ministry's idea of Galgenhumor: Australians are totally banned from leaving Australia now. Ukraine and Russia, countries named in this article as where Jews might be coming from, are NOT on the list, of course. So this is an explicit ethnic-religious exemption favoring Jews which cites the Holocaust as moral imperative.

User avatar
borjastick
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2676
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 5:52 am
Location: Europe

Re: Germany cites Holocaust in new ethnic exemption to COVID entry restrictions: Jews can enter freely; others remain ba

Postby borjastick » 1 week 4 days ago (Sun Sep 13, 2020 6:06 am)

Two questions; where would these jewish 'immigrants' be coming to Germany from and why?

The action just proves what a load of nonsense the covid thing is.
'Of the four million Jews under Nazi control in WW2, six million died and alas only five million survived.'

'We don't need evidence, we have survivors' - israeli politician

User avatar
Sannhet
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 679
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 6:12 pm
Location: USA

Re: Germany cites Holocaust in new ethnic exemption to COVID entry restrictions: Jews can enter freely; others remain ba

Postby Sannhet » 1 week 3 days ago (Mon Sep 14, 2020 11:36 pm)

borjastick wrote:The action just proves what a load of nonsense the covid thing is.

The overreaction that was "locking down" will (I believe) be remembered in shame as a public policy blunder for the ages, maybe as a form of mass delusion on global scale.

The pushers of the panic have scared the public so much that governments are stuck. Those countries that chose "all-out forever war against a flu virus," a fundamentally demagogic decision (direct appeal to emotion/fear, not to rational argument) know they can't do it for long. But they can't just re-open fully. They think any full re-opening and rejection of the virus-panic risks a domestic political crisis (Sweden had no such crisis and the epidemic there is long over). What to do? The only thing to do is start opening up piecemeal, maybe via a series of exceptions to the travel ban rules. That is where the Holocaust makes its surprising entry into the Covid story.

Inevitably the choices of who gets to be exceptions to the Covid rules are what we would call "political." The Jews suffered in the Holocaust therefore of course we have to let them in. It's a proposal that won't get major pushback in Germany, and it forms a small step towards re-normalizing society (even if normal in Germany may not be the most healthy to begin with).

As for being trapped in a situation wherein the state and culture must continue to go along with the idea that the virus is the major threat it was believed to be in early March before the data came in, clinging hard to the very-early narrative and suppressing alternative views: I see easy parallels here with the Holocaust, specifically with its staying power. "They" invested too heavily in the Holocaust (both in the 1940s and in the later incarnation of The Holocaust as we are used to it in our time) to back down just because the data is against them. I used to wonder why Revisionism never broke through despite being right, but this is the answer.

User avatar
Hektor
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 3558
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 7:59 am

Re: Germany cites Holocaust in new ethnic exemption to COVID entry restrictions: Jews can enter freely; others remain ba

Postby Hektor » 3 days 5 hours ago (Mon Sep 21, 2020 6:54 pm)

The lockdown wasn't an "overreaction" - It's far worse. There is virtually NO SCIENCE behind the whole "New Coronavirus Pandemic" thing.
To identify a new pathogen (like a virus), you need to isolate and test it on its pathogenic nature.
They didn't do that - or at least they don't want to show the results or replicate that.

A lockdown costs economies literally billions, if not trillions of dollars. Yet they can't run a simple test conducted by academics using equipment, the public is paying anyway?!

Sorry, not buying that thing.

The "Holocaust-is-a-justification-for-anything" in Germany is of course hilarious nevertheless. And they don't start thinking that there is something seriously wrong here?!

User avatar
stinky
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 211
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2018 10:59 pm

Re: Germany cites Holocaust in new ethnic exemption to COVID entry restrictions: Jews can enter freely; others remain ba

Postby stinky » 3 days 1 hour ago (Mon Sep 21, 2020 10:26 pm)

Hektor wrote:The lockdown wasn't an "overreaction" - It's far worse. There is virtually NO SCIENCE behind the whole "New Coronavirus Pandemic" thing.
To identify a new pathogen (like a virus), you need to isolate and test it on its pathogenic nature.
They didn't do that - or at least they don't want to show the results or replicate that.

Hektor has a more accurate reading of the situation.

The C-19 measures were not an 'overreaction' or a 'mistake'.
Some of the planning can be found here;

2001 Dark Winter Exercise
https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org ... about.html
On June 22-23, 2001, the Center for Strategic and International Studies, the Johns Hopkins Center for Civilian Biodefense Studies, the ANSER Institute for Homeland Security, and the Oklahoma City National Memorial Institute for the Prevention Terrorism, hosted a senior-level war game examining the national security, intergovernmental, and information challenges of a biological attack on the American homeland

2010 Rockafeller Foundation - Scenario For The Future of Technology And International Development : Scenario Narratives "Lock Step"
https://www.nommeraadio.ee/meedia/pdf/R ... dation.pdf
Scenario Narratives
A world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback

In 2012, the pandemic that the world had been anticipating for years finally hit. Unlike 2009’s H1N1, this new influenza strain — originating from wild geese — was extremely virulent and deadly. Even the most pandemic-prepared nations were quickly overwhelmed when the virus streaked around the world, infecting nearly 20 percent of the global population and killing 8 million in just seven months, the majority of them healthy young adults. The pandemic also had a deadly effect on economies: international mobility of both people and goods screeched to a halt, debilitating industries like tourism and breaking global supply chains. Even locally, normally bustling shops and office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers.

2019 EmergenSea Detour (As far as I can gather, the AUS Gov has not released the report to this exercise).
From the Guardian;
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-n ... ons-robust
A 2019 drill to practise dealing with a pandemic on a cruise ship coming into Sydney concluded that communication between government agencies was “robust and well-practised”, one year before the Ruby Princess debacle.

Was the handling of the Ruby Princess cruise ship "well-practised" or a "debacle"?
The desired "debacle" outcome eventuated, as planned I suspect.

The EmergenSea Detour exercise was conducted on;
1 May 2019 at the Department of Health in Canberra and involved the federal Department of Agriculture and Water Resources, NSW Health, Tasmanian Health and the Victorian Department of Health and Human services.

2019 Crimson Contagion
https://archive.org/details/crimson-con ... 9/mode/2up
from wiki;
Crimson Contagion was a joint exercise conducted from January to August 2019, in which numerous national, state and local, private and public organizations in the US participated, in order to test the capacity of the federal government and twelve states to respond to a severe pandemic of influenza originating in China.
The simulation, which was conducted months prior to the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, involves a scenario in which tourists returning from China spread a respiratory virus in the United States, beginning in Chicago. In less than two months the virus had infected 110 million Americans, killing more than half a million. The report issued at the conclusion of the exercise outlines the government's limited capacity to respond to a pandemic, with federal agencies lacking the funds, coordination, and resources to facilitate an effective response to the virus.

2019 Event 201
https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org ... nario.html
Event 201 was a 3.5-hour pandemic tabletop exercise that simulated a series of dramatic, scenario-based facilitated discussions, confronting difficult, true-to-life dilemmas associated with response to a hypothetical, but scientifically plausible, pandemic. 15 global business, government, and public health leaders were players in the simulation exercise that highlighted unresolved real-world policy and economic issues that could be solved with sufficient political will, financial investment, and attention now and in the future.

The exercise consisted of pre-recorded news broadcasts, live “staff” briefings, and moderated discussions on specific topics. These issues were carefully designed in a compelling narrative that educated the participants and the audience.

The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, World Economic Forum, and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation jointly propose these recommendations.

Event 201 simulates an outbreak of a novel zoonotic coronavirus transmitted from bats to pigs to people that eventually becomes efficiently transmissible from person to person, leading to a severe pandemic. The pathogen and the disease it causes are modeled largely on SARS, but it is more transmissible in the community setting by people with mild symptoms.

There is no possibility of a vaccine being available in the first year. There is a fictional antiviral drug that can help the sick but not significantly limit spread of the disease.
Since the whole human population is susceptible, during the initial months of the pandemic, the cumulative number of cases increases exponentially, doubling every week. And as the cases and deaths accumulate, the economic and societal consequences become increasingly severe.
The scenario ends at the 18-month point, with 65 million deaths. The pandemic is beginning to slow due to the decreasing number of susceptible people. The pandemic will continue at some rate until there is an effective vaccine or until 80-90 % of the global population has been exposed. From that point on, it is likely to be an endemic childhood disease.


2021 The Great Reset - World Economic Forum
https://www.weforum.org/great-reset/about
“The Great Reset” will be the theme of a unique twin summit in January 2021, convened by the World Economic Forum.
“The Great Reset” is a commitment to jointly and urgently build the foundations of our economic and social system for a more fair, sustainable and resilient future.
It requires a new social contract centred on human dignity, social justice and where societal progress does not fall behind economic development.
The global health crisis has laid bare longstanding ruptures in our economies and societies, and created a social crisis that urgently requires decent, meaningful jobs.
The twin summit will be both in-person and virtual, connecting key global governmental and business leaders in Davos with a global multistakeholder network in 400 cities around the world for a forward-oriented dialogue driven by the younger generation.


Problem. Reaction. Solution

Whitney Web covers the material I have highlighted comprehensively in her 'Engineering Contagion Series' here;
https://unlimitedhangout.com/engineering-contagion/
It's easier to fool someone than to convince them that they have been fooled

Turpitz
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 1003
Joined: Sun May 11, 2003 12:57 pm

Re: Germany cites Holocaust in new ethnic exemption to COVID entry restrictions: Jews can enter freely; others remain ba

Postby Turpitz » 1 day 7 hours ago (Wed Sep 23, 2020 4:29 pm)

All the Honkies are locked up in their post-war Zionist Gulag, but the immigrants can still flood in unhindered.

User avatar
stinky
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 211
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2018 10:59 pm

Re: Germany cites Holocaust in new ethnic exemption to COVID entry restrictions: Jews can enter freely; others remain ba

Postby stinky » 1 day 2 hours ago (Wed Sep 23, 2020 9:29 pm)

Since the economy is smashed because of the deadly, killer (99.8% survival rate) virus the only way to fix it is through increased immigration ya know.
It's easier to fool someone than to convince them that they have been fooled


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests