Archie wrote:They say it was a "partial reconstruction" based on blueprints AND eyewitness testimony. But the key point I think is the Zyklon holes and the existence of those is based on witness stories, not any blueprints or documents. And according to their own version of events, the blueprints they used are from before it was made into a gas chamber.
Too true. If they were to just say "eyewitnesses" it would fail to impress people, and they wouldn't be taken seriously. "Blue prints and eye witnesses", in that order, is definitely not a mistake. It's intentional. Most people would just assume that the holes and columns for the pellets were apart of these blue prints and think nothing more of it. But like you said, this just isn't the case. The blue prints are the partial truth in a giant lie, used to give credence to it.
It doesn't help that the common perception of "gas chambers" is that they're a highly engineered, highly efficient mechanical structure. Built for the purposes of killing people. Which just isn't true. But this helps the Holocaust narrative because then any mention of alleged "blue prints" will be taken to mean "proof of homicidal gas chambers". Hence why you need to explain to people that when you see 'Gaskammer'
on a document, it's not in reference to a "fake shower" room used to kill 6 million Jews.