Harris/Biden will "Establish a new Task Force on Online Harassment and Abuse" - will CODOH be targeted?

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
User avatar
Lamprecht
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2165
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:32 pm

Harris/Biden will "Establish a new Task Force on Online Harassment and Abuse" - will CODOH be targeted?

Postby Lamprecht » 2 weeks 4 days ago (Sat Nov 07, 2020 1:29 pm)

AP has declared that Biden is the new president elect. Trump has stated that he has won and that the democrats have engaged in election fraud. As of now we can't be certain what will happen, but in the case of a Harris/Biden presidency a "new Task Force" will be created to address "extremism" online. Although violence and harassment against revisionists greatly surpasses the opposite, there are cases that can link "Holocaust denial" to violent extremism. Back in 2009 James Wenneker von Brunn - declared a "Holocaust denier" - shot up the USHMM. More recently in Germany, on October 2019, Stephan Balliet attempted to shoot up a synagogue with improvised weapons and denied the H on video. He shot two random bystanders on the street.
The radical left can and probably will use these examples as 'proof' that revisionism is a form of extremism that promotes violence. How will CODOH (hosted in the USA) fare under a Harris/Biden administration?

From their website:
Establish a new Task Force on Online Harassment and Abuse to focus on the connection between mass shootings, online harassment, extremism, and violence against women. As President, Joe Biden will convene a national Task Force with federal agencies, state leaders, advocates, law enforcement, and technology experts to study rampant online sexual harassment, stalking, and threats, including revenge porn and deepfakes — and the connection between this harassment, mass shootings, extremism and violence against women. The Task Force will be charged with developing cutting-edge strategies and recommendations for how federal and state governments, social media companies, schools, and other public and private entities can tackle this unique challenge. The Task Force will consider platform accountability, transparent reporting requirements for incidents of harassment and response, and best practices.
https://joebiden.com/gunsafety/
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance -- that principle is contempt prior to investigation."
— Herbert Spencer

User avatar
Lamprecht
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2165
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:32 pm

Re: Harris/Biden will "Establish a new Task Force on Online Harassment and Abuse" - will CODOH be targeted?

Postby Lamprecht » 2 weeks 4 days ago (Sat Nov 07, 2020 1:45 pm)

White nationalists could have firearms taken under red flag law proposed by Kamala Harris
Image
http://archive.fo/erlNH | http://web.archive.org/web/201908141819 ... 009237001/
“We need to take action to keep guns out of the hands of dangerous people and stop violent, hate-fueled attacks before they happen,” Harris said. “By focusing on confronting these domestic terror threats, we can save lives.”

There is also a bill endorsed by Harris dedicated to using the FBI "to analyze and monitor domestic terrorist activity and require the Federal Government to take steps to prevent domestic terrorism.":
116th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. 894

To authorize dedicated domestic terrorism offices within the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Justice, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation to analyze and monitor domestic terrorist activity and require the Federal Government to take steps to prevent domestic terrorism.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

March 27, 2019

Mr. Durbin (for himself, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. Booker, Mr. Cardin, Mr. Coons, Ms. Duckworth, Ms. Harris, Mr. Kaine, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Markey, Mr. Whitehouse, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Schatz, and Mr. Reed) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To authorize dedicated domestic terrorism offices within the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Justice, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation to analyze and monitor domestic terrorist activity and require the Federal Government to take steps to prevent domestic terrorism.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. Short title.

This Act may be cited as the “Domestic Terrorism Prevention Act of 2019”.

SEC. 2. Findings.

Congress finds the following:

(1) White supremacists and other far-right-wing extremists are the most significant domestic terrorism threat facing the United States.

(2) On February 22, 2019, a Trump Administration United States Department of Justice official wrote in a New York Times op-ed that “white supremacy and far-right extremism are among the greatest domestic-security threats facing the United States. Regrettably, over the past 25 years, law enforcement, at both the Federal and State levels, has been slow to respond. … Killings committed by individuals and groups associated with far-right extremist groups have risen significantly.”.

(3) An April 2017 Government Accountability Office report on the significant, lethal threat posed by domestic violent extremists explained that “[s]ince September 12, 2001, the number of fatalities caused by domestic violent extremists has ranged from 1 to 49 in a given year.” The report noted: “[F]atalities resulting from attacks by far right wing violent extremists have exceeded those caused by radical Islamist violent extremists in 10 of the 15 years, and were the same in 3 of the years since September 12, 2001. Of the 85 violent extremist incidents that resulted in death since September 12, 2001, far right wing violent extremist groups were responsible for 62 (73 percent) while radical Islamist violent extremists were responsible for 23 (27 percent).”.

(4) An unclassified May 2017 joint intelligence bulletin from the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Department of Homeland Security found that “white supremacist extremism poses [a] persistent threat of lethal violence,” and that White supremacists “were responsible for 49 homicides in 26 attacks from 2000 to 2016 … more than any other domestic extremist movement”.

(5) Fatal terrorist attacks by far-right-wing extremists include—

(A) the August 5, 2012, mass shooting at a Sikh gurdwara in Oak Creek, Wisconsin, in which a White supremacist shot and killed 6 members of the gurdwara;

(B) the April 13, 2014, mass shooting at a Jewish community center and a Jewish assisted living facility in Overland Park, Kansas, in which a neo-Nazi shot and killed 3 civilians, including a 14-year-old teenager;

(C) the June 8, 2014, ambush in Las Vegas, Nevada, in which 2 supporters of the far-right-wing “patriot” movement shot and killed 2 police officers and a civilian;

(D) the June 17, 2015, mass shooting at the Emanuel AME Church in Charleston, South Carolina, in which a White supremacist shot and killed 9 members of the church;

(E) the November 27, 2015, mass shooting at a Planned Parenthood clinic in Colorado Springs, Colorado, in which an anti-abortion extremist shot and killed a police officer and 2 civilians;

(F) the March 20, 2017, murder of an African-American man in New York City, allegedly committed by a White supremacist who reportedly traveled to New York “for the purpose of killing black men”;

(G) the May 26, 2017, attack in Portland, Oregon, in which a White supremacist allegedly murdered 2 men and injured a third after the men defended 2 young women whom the individual had targeted with anti-Muslim hate speech;

(H) the August 12, 2017, attack in Charlottesville, Virginia, in which a White supremacist killed one and injured nineteen after driving his car through a crowd of individuals protesting a neo-Nazi rally, and of which former Attorney General Jeff Sessions said, “It does meet the definition of domestic terrorism in our statute.”;

(I) the July 2018 murder of an African-American woman from Kansas City, Missouri, allegedly committed by a White supremacist who reportedly bragged about being a member of the Ku Klux Klan;

(J) the October 24, 2018, shooting in Jeffersontown, Kentucky, in which a White man allegedly murdered 2 African Americans at a grocery store after first attempting to enter a church with a predominantly African-American congregation during a service; and

(K) the October 27, 2018, mass shooting at the Tree of Life Synagogue in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, in which a White nationalist allegedly shot and killed 11 members of the congregation.

(6) In November 2018, the Federal Bureau of Investigation released its annual hate crime incident report, which found that in 2017, hate crimes increased by approximately 17 percent, including a 23-percent increase in religion-based hate crimes, an 18-percent increase in race-based crimes, and a 5-percent increase in crimes directed against LGBT individuals. The total number of reported hate crimes rose for the third consecutive year. The previous year's report found that in 2016, hate crimes increased by almost 5 percent, including a 19-percent rise in hate crimes against American Muslims; additionally, of the hate crimes motivated by religious bias in 2016, 53 percent were anti-Semitic. Similarly, the report analyzing 2015 data found that hate crimes increased by 6 percent that year. Much of the 2015 increase came from a 66-percent rise in attacks on American Muslims and a 9-percent rise in attacks on American Jews. In all three reports, race-based crimes were most numerous, and those crimes most often targeted African Americans.

(7) On March 15, 2019, a White nationalist was arrested and charged with murder after allegedly killing 50 Muslim worshippers and injuring more than 40 in a massacre at the Al Noor Mosque and Linwood Mosque in Christchurch, New Zealand. The alleged shooter posted a hate-filled, xenophobic manifesto that detailed his White nationalist ideology before the massacre. Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern labeled the massacre a terrorist attack.

(8) In January 2017, a right-wing extremist who had expressed anti-Muslim views was charged with murder for allegedly killing 6 people and injuring 19 in a shooting rampage at a mosque in Quebec City, Canada. It was the first-ever mass shooting at a mosque in North America, and Prime Minister Trudeau labeled it a terrorist attack.

(9) On February 15, 2019, Federal authorities arrested U.S. Coast Guard Lieutenant Christopher Paul Hasson, who was allegedly planning to kill a number of prominent journalists, professors, judges, and “leftists in general”. In court filings, prosecutors described Lieutenant Hasson as a “domestic terrorist” who in an email “identified himself as a White Nationalist for over 30 years and advocated for ‘focused violence’ in order to establish a white homeland.”.
https://www.congress.gov/116/bills/s894 ... s894is.xml
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance -- that principle is contempt prior to investigation."
— Herbert Spencer

User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 10182
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Re: Harris/Biden will "Establish a new Task Force on Online Harassment and Abuse" - will CODOH be targeted?

Postby Hannover » 2 weeks 4 days ago (Sat Nov 07, 2020 2:47 pm)

Note that we see a lot of "allegedly" in that list of "crimes by white supremacists".

Lamprecht posted:
Back in 2009 James Wenneker von Brunn - declared a "Holocaust denier" - shot up the USHMM. More recently in Germany, on October 2019, Stephan Balliet attempted to shoot up a synagogue with improvised weapons and denied the H on video. He shot two random bystanders on the street.
The radical left can and probably will use these examples as 'proof' that revisionism is a form of extremism that promotes violence. How will CODOH (hosted in the USA) fare under a Harris/Biden administration?

Hitler was a vegetarian. So using the left's own absurd logic, all vegetarians are threats.

BTW, "shootings" by whites are minisicule compared to the yearly mass murders of whites by blacks & browns that are ignored by the Zionist / neo-Marxist controlled 'media',

The Color of Crime: https://www.amren.com/the-color-of-crime/
exc:
- blacks are six times more likely than a non­-black to commit murder, and 12 times more likely to murder someone of another race than to be murdered by someone of another race.
- of interracial violence that involved blacks and whites, blacks were the perpetrators 85 percent of the time. This meant a black person was 27 times more likely to attack a white person than vice versa. A Hispanic was eight times more likely to attack a white person than vice versa.
- in New York City, a black was 31 times more likely than a white to be arrested for murder, and a Hispanic was 12.4 times more likely. For the crime of “shooting” — defined as firing a bullet that hits someone — a black was 98.4 times more likely than a white to be arrested, and a Hispanic was 23.6 times more likely.
- If New York City were all white, the murder rate would drop by 91 percent, the robbery rate by 81 percent, and the shootings rate by 97 percent.
- In an all­-white Chicago, murder would decline 90 percent, rape by 81 percent, and robbery by 90 percent.

plus:
Fake Hate Crimes: a database of hate crime hoaxes in the USA:
http://www.fakehatecrimes.org/

-Mural of Tina Turner is defaced with a red swastika outside a North Carolina record store .. Who benefits?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... store.html
- Jewish suspects arrested over swastika graffiti on synagogues: http://www.timesofisrael.com/jewish-sus ... ynagogues/
- Poorly Drawn Swastikas Spray-Painted On Monument In Milwaukee: https://www.prisonplanet.com/fake-hate- ... aukee.html
- Jew arrested for dozens of fake 'hate crimes': http://www.breitbart.com/big-government ... oax-spree/
- Man Caught Spray Painting Swastika On College Campus Is Black: http://dailycaller.com/2017/10/16/man-c ... port-says/
- Bomb threats to Jewish centers & schools were really a dark web moneymaking scheme by Jews : https://www.rt.com/usa/399027-bomb-jcc- ... -alphabay/
- Staged Jew bomb hoaxes: http://www.timesofisrael.com/israel-fil ... ion-fraud/
- another staged 'hate crime' / 'Neo-Nazi' Graffiti Found In Brooklyn Synagogue - Suspect is Black leftist: viewtopic.php?f=2&t=12101
- Fake Hate? ‘Trump Rules’ & Poorly Drawn Swastikas Spray-Painted On Monument In Milwaukee
https://www.prisonplanet.com/fake-hate- ... aukee.html
- Bomb threats to Jewish centers & schools were really a dark web moneymaking scheme by Jews
https://www.rt.com/usa/399027-bomb-jcc- ... -alphabay/
- Jewish suspects arrested over swastika graffiti on synagogues
http://www.timesofisrael.com/jewish-sus ... ynagogues/

and:
Overwhelming Evidence Exposes Democrat Party’s Ongoing Systemic Racism
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020 ... ic-racism/
Real numbers tell the truth that the Communists ignore and want you to never see
ex.:
"All these cities where black Americans are gunned down, where blacks claim they live under systemic racism… All of them are run by Democrats — all of them — and in most cases, have been for generations: Chicago, Minneapolis, Baltimore. St. Louis, Oakland, Los Angeles, New York, Dallas, Austin, Charlotte, Atlanta, Detroit, New Orleans, Flint, Memphis, Birmingham… and on and on and on…"
- "black Berkeley professor who must remain anonymous in order to protect his/her job:
The vast majority of violence visited on the black community is committed by black people. There are virtually no marches for these invisible victims, no public silences, no heartfelt letters from the UC regents, deans, and departmental heads. The message is clear: Black lives only matter when whites take them. Black violence is expected and insoluble, while white violence requires explanation and demands solution. Please look into your hearts and see how monstrously bigoted this formulation truly is."

- Hannover
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

Turpitz
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 1027
Joined: Sun May 11, 2003 12:57 pm

Re: Harris/Biden will "Establish a new Task Force on Online Harassment and Abuse" - will CODOH be targeted?

Postby Turpitz » 2 weeks 4 days ago (Sat Nov 07, 2020 3:21 pm)

Irving will be over the moon to see the commies disarm you, he's been baying for this moment for a long time. They will have you all under house arrest and totally atomised as a people, as well, what with the Covid bullshit. The question remains when are people going to draw a line in the sand?

User avatar
HMSendeavour
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 479
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2018 3:12 pm
Contact:

Re: Harris/Biden will "Establish a new Task Force on Online Harassment and Abuse" - will CODOH be targeted?

Postby HMSendeavour » 2 weeks 3 days ago (Sat Nov 07, 2020 9:24 pm)

Turpitz wrote:Irving will be over the moon to see the commies disarm you, he's been baying for this moment for a long time. They will have you all under house arrest and totally atomised as a people, as well, what with the Covid bullshit. The question remains when are people going to draw a line in the sand?


Why would Irving be "over the moon" for this?
Now what does it mean for the independent expert witness Van Pelt? In his eyes he had two possibilities. Either to confirm the Holocaust story, or to go insane. - Germar Rudolf, 13th IHR Conference

Turpitz
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 1027
Joined: Sun May 11, 2003 12:57 pm

Re: Harris/Biden will "Establish a new Task Force on Online Harassment and Abuse" - will CODOH be targeted?

Postby Turpitz » 2 weeks 3 days ago (Sun Nov 08, 2020 5:44 am)

Why would Irving be "over the moon" for this?


I don't know, maybe you should ask him! I personally think him senile. But it is an irrefutable fact that he has been championing the anti-gun movemnent and their desire to see Americans disarmed for many years. He has the same attitude towards the total disarmament of the British people, who are not even allowed to carry pen-knives today. This whilst the police become increasingly militarised and their ranks gradually fill with foreigners.

Remember November the 7th, 1917, in Russia? Coincedence, or not?



I personally think this panto is just to pave the way for that half-caste woman, who is married to that Jew, to become the first 'American' president. You'll all be able to crawl up and fawn at her feet as she takes America apart and feeds it to the U.N. and their Agenda-21.

User avatar
HMSendeavour
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 479
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2018 3:12 pm
Contact:

Re: Harris/Biden will "Establish a new Task Force on Online Harassment and Abuse" - will CODOH be targeted?

Postby HMSendeavour » 2 weeks 3 days ago (Sun Nov 08, 2020 7:56 am)

Turpitz wrote:
Why would Irving be "over the moon" for this?


I don't know, maybe you should ask him! I personally think him senile. But it is an irrefutable fact that he has been championing the anti-gun movemnent and their desire to see Americans disarmed for many years. He has the same attitude towards the total disarmament of the British people, who are not even allowed to carry pen-knives today. This whilst the police become increasingly militarised and their ranks gradually fill with foreigners.

Remember November the 7th, 1917, in Russia? Coincedence, or not?



I personally think this panto is just to pave the way for that half-caste woman, who is married to that Jew, to become the first 'American' president. You'll all be able to crawl up and fawn at her feet as she takes America apart and feeds it to the U.N. and their Agenda-21.


I've never heard about this. Frankly, if it's true I'm surprised. I always thought that Irving was a nationalist, the last thing i'd expect from a nationalist, because I am one myself, is to take away the ability for my people to defend themselves. Especially in times such as this where being white means having a target on your back. Having said that, I'd disagree that he's senile. He's a bit slow perhaps, as you are when you're older. But I don't think he's senile.

Not only are the British people not allowed to carry pen-knives, but they're not even allowed to buy cutlery, tea or table spoons, or even nails. So I've heard/seen from various news clippings.

As for Biden, I would agree that he is nothing more than a stand in for the "cappuccino" future of the United States, while other white countries are but a footstep behind. Jews having nothing to fear as per usual.

Tweet.jpg


Such is the game. You know, there was voter fraud, that much is obvious. It was rigged and we're yet to see what the outcome will be. Whether it will go to court or whatever. Not the point really, what's important to realise is that the entire system is rigged. Trump was useless, he didn't protect his base, he didn't fulfil his promises to the White Americans who desperately wanted a systematic way out of demographic exile and extermination. But they were never going to get it, and if Biden continues as President, and when he dies or whatever, the system will just go on unopposed. As will the Jews. As will their numerous willing lackey's. Whites, traditional societal norms that keep us alive will be further subjected to humiliation and attack until there's nothing left. We don't have a Hitler to save us from this mess.

These half caste brown women in step with Jews and their white ilk are going to be the subhumans who clamp the trap on the rest of us who have a stake in civilisation.
Mug-shots2.jpg
NINTCHDBPICT000613306505.jpg

These dysgenic, probably infertile and certainly mentally ill mugs have been handed the keys to the future. They're behind the wheel of civilisation and they have no intention of letting anyone survive once they crash it into the sea of discontent and misery. The only living thing to exist once they're done, will probably be some mystery meat population living inside the rubble of our former nations.

The Holocaust narrative is but one part of all this. The truth of that event only matters to an end. Because it symbolises much more than just the myth of gas chambers, it represents whether truth lives or dies in our modern age. As do many other things.
Now what does it mean for the independent expert witness Van Pelt? In his eyes he had two possibilities. Either to confirm the Holocaust story, or to go insane. - Germar Rudolf, 13th IHR Conference

Turpitz
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 1027
Joined: Sun May 11, 2003 12:57 pm

Re: Harris/Biden will "Establish a new Task Force on Online Harassment and Abuse" - will CODOH be targeted?

Postby Turpitz » 2 weeks 2 days ago (Mon Nov 09, 2020 3:09 pm)

Irving was backing that hardcore Marxist, Corbyn. And you think Irving a nationalist, come on!

There have been numerous posters, on this very forum, mentioning Irving's ant-gun rambles over the years, here's one mention of it here: viewtopic.php?f=2&t=9729

When they mention "anti-gun" you can be assured that what they really mean is: Goy-anti-gun.

User avatar
stinky
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 250
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2018 10:59 pm

Re: Harris/Biden will "Establish a new Task Force on Online Harassment and Abuse" - will CODOH be targeted?

Postby stinky » 2 weeks 2 days ago (Mon Nov 09, 2020 4:23 pm)

Turpitz wrote:When they mention "anti-gun" you can be assured that what they really mean is: Goy-anti-gun.


Unsurprisingly, it looks that way.
Unless you are a self-hating, white cheerleader for #BLM, you are a "white supremacist".
And they are coming for your guns, because;

Lamprecht wrote:

Congress finds the following:

(1) White supremacists and other far-right-wing extremists are the most significant domestic terrorism threat facing the United States.
https://www.congress.gov/116/bills/s894 ... s894is.xml
It's easier to fool someone than to convince them that they have been fooled

User avatar
HMSendeavour
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 479
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2018 3:12 pm
Contact:

Re: Harris/Biden will "Establish a new Task Force on Online Harassment and Abuse" - will CODOH be targeted?

Postby HMSendeavour » 2 weeks 1 day ago (Mon Nov 09, 2020 6:05 pm)

Turpitz wrote:Irving was backing that hardcore Marxist, Corbyn. And you think Irving a nationalist, come on!

There have been numerous posters, on this very forum, mentioning Irving's ant-gun rambles over the years, here's one mention of it here: viewtopic.php?f=2&t=9729


Very unfortunate. Thankfully the value in Irving isn't his own personal opinions. Nobody needs to adopt them.
Now what does it mean for the independent expert witness Van Pelt? In his eyes he had two possibilities. Either to confirm the Holocaust story, or to go insane. - Germar Rudolf, 13th IHR Conference

User avatar
Moderator
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1758
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2002 9:23 am

Re: Harris/Biden will "Establish a new Task Force on Online Harassment and Abuse" - will CODOH be targeted?

Postby Moderator » 2 weeks 1 day ago (Tue Nov 10, 2020 9:16 am)

All:
Let's get back on topic, and Turpitz, do watch the language.
Thanks, M1
Only lies need to be shielded from debate, truth welcomes it.

Merlin300
Member
Member
Posts: 83
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2017 2:21 pm

Re: Harris/Biden will "Establish a new Task Force on Online Harassment and Abuse" - will CODOH be targeted?

Postby Merlin300 » 2 weeks 22 hours ago (Tue Nov 10, 2020 6:32 pm)

Lamprecht wrote:
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

March 27, 2019

Mr. Durbin (for himself, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. Booker, Mr. Cardin, Mr. Coons, Ms. Duckworth, Ms. Harris, Mr. Kaine, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Markey, Mr. Whitehouse, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Schatz, and Mr. Reed) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To authorize dedicated domestic terrorism offices within the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Justice, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation to analyze and monitor domestic terrorist activity and require the Federal Government to take steps to prevent domestic terrorism.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. Short title.



This Act may be cited as the “Domestic Terrorism Prevention Act of 2019”.



Excuse me Lamprecht, but, but I thought the bill was directed at all those crazy Holocaust Believers attacking Revisionist scholars, McCalden, Butz, Cole, Zundel, Professor Robert Faurisson, burning the IHR.

User avatar
Lamprecht
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2165
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:32 pm

Re: Harris/Biden will "Establish a new Task Force on Online Harassment and Abuse" - will CODOH be targeted?

Postby Lamprecht » 2 weeks 20 hours ago (Tue Nov 10, 2020 8:51 pm)

Merlin300 wrote:Excuse me Lamprecht, but, but I thought the bill was directed at all those crazy Holocaust Believers attacking Revisionist scholars, McCalden, Butz, Cole, Zundel, Professor Robert Faurisson, burning the IHR.

You would think that, but we're dealing with the same people that think "Black Lives Matter" only applies to the fraction of a percent of Blacks shot by police rather than the >90% of homicides which are Black-on-Black.

A reminder, from: by Ron Unz: 'Banned by Amazon and Purged by the Neocons' / The Usual Enemies of Free Speech are desperate
Lamprecht wrote:The Biden family is an example of "conversion into Judasm"
Hunter Biden and Jewish wife have matching Hebrew tattoos http://archive.fo/1747Y

"All three of Biden’s children — Beau and Hunter, his sons with his first wife, Neilia Biden, and Ashley, his daughter with current wife Jill Jacobs biden — married members of the tribe" (Everything you need to know about Joe Biden’s Jewish relatives http://archive.fo/pn5nO)

Kamala Harris (Biden's VP pick) is also married to a Jew: Doug Emhoff. She uses her maiden name.
"My son is a wonderful guy, a wonderful son, and he’s brilliant... We’ve been sworn to secrecy. We were told not to talk to anybody... He was bar mitzvahed in New Jersey, I can tell you that... I really wish I could talk because I think he’s incredible. Just know he was a wonderful, bright student and a great kid. Maybe after they get to the White House, I’ll be more free. (To his friends, Doug Emhoff, poised to be Second Gentleman, is already “Second Mensch” http://archive.fo/BFkYU)
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance -- that principle is contempt prior to investigation."
— Herbert Spencer

User avatar
Lamprecht
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2165
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:32 pm

Re: Harris/Biden will "Establish a new Task Force on Online Harassment and Abuse" - will CODOH be targeted?

Postby Lamprecht » 5 days 7 hours ago (Fri Nov 20, 2020 9:32 am)

A member of Biden's "transition team" has called for "hate speech" laws that are more extreme than those of Europe and Canada.

https://twitter.com/larryelder/status/1 ... 6271976448
Image
http://archive.fo/zhqgf | https://thegrayzone.com/2020/11/11/rich ... agm-biden/

Richard Stengel, who is Jewish, claimed the First Amendment has "a design flaw" and that all forms of "disinformation" must be banned. He wrote an article in the Washington Post:
Why America needs a hate speech law

Oct. 29, 2019 at 12:20 p.m. UTC

When I was a journalist, I loved Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.’s assertion that the Constitution and the First Amendment are not just about protecting “free thought for those who agree with us but freedom for the thought that we hate.”

But as a government official traveling around the world championing the virtues of free speech, I came to see how our First Amendment standard is an outlier. Even the most sophisticated Arab diplomats that I dealt with did not understand why the First Amendment allows someone to burn a Koran. Why, they asked me, would you ever want to protect that?

It’s a fair question. Yes, the First Amendment protects the “thought that we hate,” but it should not protect hateful speech that can cause violence by one group against another. In an age when everyone has a megaphone, that seems like a design flaw.

It is important to remember that our First Amendment doesn’t just protect the good guys; our foremost liberty also protects any bad actors who hide behind it to weaken our society. In the weeks leading up to the 2016 election, Russia’s Internet Research Agency planted false stories hoping they would go viral. They did. Russian agents assumed fake identities, promulgated false narratives and spread lies on Twitter and Facebook, all protected by the First Amendment.

The Russians understood that our free press and its reflex toward balance and fairness would enable Moscow to slip its destructive ideas into our media ecosystem. When Putin said back in 2014 that there were no Russian troops in Crimea — an outright lie — he knew our media would report it, and we did.

That’s partly because the intellectual underpinning of the First Amendment was engineered for a simpler era. The amendment rests on the notion that the truth will win out in what Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas called “the marketplace of ideas.” This “marketplace” model has a long history going back to 17th-century English intellectual John Milton, but in all that time, no one ever quite explained how good ideas drive out bad ones, how truth triumphs over falsehood.

Milton, an early opponent of censorship, said truth would prevail in a “free and open encounter.” A century later, the framers believed that this marketplace was necessary for people to make informed choices in a democracy. Somehow, magically, truth would emerge. The presumption has always been that the marketplace would offer a level playing field. But in the age of social media, that landscape is neither level nor fair.

On the Internet, truth is not optimized. On the Web, it’s not enough to battle falsehood with truth; the truth doesn’t always win. In the age of social media, the marketplace model doesn’t work. A 2016 Stanford study showed that 82 percent of middle schoolers couldn’t distinguish between an ad labeled “sponsored content” and an actual news story. Only a quarter of high school students could tell the difference between an actual verified news site and one from a deceptive account designed to look like a real one.

Since World War II, many nations have passed laws to curb the incitement of racial and religious hatred. These laws started out as protections against the kinds of anti-Semitic bigotry that gave rise to the Holocaust. We call them hate speech laws, but there’s no agreed-upon definition of what hate speech actually is. In general, hate speech is speech that attacks and insults people on the basis of race, religion, ethnic origin and sexual orientation.

I think it’s time to consider these statutes.
The modern standard of dangerous speech comes from Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969) and holds that speech that directly incites “imminent lawless action” or is likely to do so can be restricted. Domestic terrorists such as Dylann Roof and Omar Mateen and the El Paso shooter were consumers of hate speech. Speech doesn’t pull the trigger, but does anyone seriously doubt that such hateful speech creates a climate where such acts are more likely?

Let the debate begin. Hate speech has a less violent, but nearly as damaging, impact in another way: It diminishes tolerance. It enables discrimination. Isn’t that, by definition, speech that undermines the values that the First Amendment was designed to protect: fairness, due process, equality before the law? Why shouldn’t the states experiment with their own version of hate speech statutes to penalize speech that deliberately insults people based on religion, race, ethnicity and sexual orientation?

All speech is not equal. And where truth cannot drive out lies, we must add new guardrails. I’m all for protecting “thought that we hate,” but not speech that incites hate. It undermines the very values of a fair marketplace of ideas that the First Amendment is designed to protect.
http://archive.fo/dPLbg | http://web.archive.org/web/201910300107 ... peech-law/
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance -- that principle is contempt prior to investigation."
— Herbert Spencer

User avatar
stinky
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 250
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2018 10:59 pm

Re: Harris/Biden will "Establish a new Task Force on Online Harassment and Abuse" - will CODOH be targeted?

Postby stinky » 4 days 23 hours ago (Fri Nov 20, 2020 5:46 pm)

Lamprecht wrote:A member of Biden's "transition team" has called for "hate speech" laws that are more extreme than those of Europe and Canada.
http://archive.fo/zhqgf | https://thegrayzone.com/2020/11/11/rich ... agm-biden/
Richard Stengel, who is Jewish

No way!
I'm so shocked
It's easier to fool someone than to convince them that they have been fooled


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests