'Holocaust Museum' Explains How Complete Lack of Physical Evidence Is Proof of 'Holocaust'

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 10305
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

'Holocaust Museum' Explains How Complete Lack of Physical Evidence Is Proof of 'Holocaust'

Postby Hannover » 3 months 1 day ago (Wed Dec 02, 2020 2:23 am)

The excuses made by Jew supremacists who profit big time have been truly pathetic, the excuses here are no different.

This Forum has covered all the locations mentioned below, as well as all alleged locations, period. Revisionists have simply debunked any & all alleged places, fantasies about them, and excuses given.

In spite of what the quoted Ephraim Kaye of the Yad Vashem Holocaust Theme Park says about the Germans magically & impossibly making those alleged vast remains disappear, the fact is that his very own "holocaust historians" (see examples) claim that the human remains of 'holocausted' Jews and 'others' do in fact exist today in known locations, including all the ones mentioned in this piece. The fact is that no such remains exist.

ex.:
The mass graves were opened and the corpses were taken out, to be consumed by the flames of huge pyres (the ‘roasts’). The bones were crushed and, together with the ashes, were reburied in the same graves.
- Israel Gutman (ed.), Encyclopedia of the Holocaust, 4 vols., Macmillan, New York 1990, vol. 4, p. 1481-87
and:
The camp command was confronted with the problem of disposing of the large piles of ash and bits of bone that remained… Ultimately it was decided to dump the ash and bits of bone into the ditches that had previously held the bodies and to cover them with a thick layer of sand and dirt…"
-from Yitzhak Arad, BELZEC, SOBIBOR, TREBLINKA - (chapter 23) - The Erasure of the Crimes

Were seeing here yet another example of liars who can't keep their lies straight.
Read on.

- Hannover
Holocaust Museum Head Explains How The Complete Lack of Physical Evidence Of The Holocaust Is Proof It Happened
https://christiansfortruth.com/holocaus ... -happened/

Here we have an interview with Ephraim Kaye, a director at Yad Vashem Holocaust Museum in Israel — using classic Orwellian double-think — in which he attempts to explain how the complete lack of physical evidence to support the official Holocaust narrative is actually proof that the Holocaust happened.

In essence, he’s admitting that Holocaust denial is completely rational — this complete lack of physical evidence requires a extraordinary leap of faith to believe it happened — and yet they have thrown many people in jail — and continue to do so — for not going along with Kaye’s implausible explanation as to why there is no evidence to support this event — which Kaye himself describes as “unbelievable“.

In Kaye’s own words:
Essentially, Holocaust denial is part and parcel of the history of the Holocaust itself — as the Nazis perpetrated against the Jews during World War II.

And what do I mean? I’m going to give you a few examples. The most glaring, blatant example is the largest death camp — Auschwitz-Birkenau — or Auschwitz II as the Germans called it — where — this is a death camp — that began its killing operations in March 1942 and to continue to murder people until November 1944 when the facility was closed down because the Russians were getting too close.

During that two and a half years, it’s anywhere between 1.2 and 1.4 million people were murdered — 90% were Jews — and the chilling fact is when you come back and you visit that facility today — having been there 18, 19 times with different groups — IDF officers — educators — and you walk around the camp, which geographically is a tremendous area — it had 60,000 permanent prisoners at any given time — and you walk around and you look for the physical evidence of the destruction of 1.2 to 1.4 million people — what’s distressing, and depressing is that you really don’t find it.

You don’t find the mountains of clothing of victims that arrived there. You don’t find mountains of ashes and bones — it was taken in trucks and dumped in the Vistula (River) or the swamp around Auschwitz. You don’t see the actual buildings of the crematoria or gas chambers — they were blown up by the Germans before they retreat in 1945.

And so you come to a death camp facility, and essentially you walk away to think something very sterile — you don’t actually see with your own eyes — hands, smell, touch — the actual destruction process.

If I go take you back to a place called Treblinka — one of the small death camps — where between the 22nd of July, 1942 and the 2nd of August 1943 — it’s estimated that 900,000 Jews were murdered in those 13 months at Treblinka. And you go back and visit this death camp — unbelievable — there is nothing there — well, there is something there today. In 1960, the Polish government created a very moving memorial of 17,000 stones that they dispersed in the entire area where the camp originally was. And on the stones they engraved the names of Jewish communities that were sent to Treblinka and destroyed there.

But when you look for physical evidence, there’s nothing there — because before that camp was closed down — by the way because of a Jewish prisoner revolt on the 2nd of August, 1943 — but in the Spring of 1943, there were no crematoria at Treblinka — there were gas chambers — bodies were buried in tremendous deep graves that were dug by steam shovels — at Treblinka. Himmler gave an order to dig everything up — destroy everything — and disperse it in the entire area — which was done — and Jewish prisoners had to do this work. And so a person visits today Treblinka and sees nothing. A person visits Belzec or Chelmno, or Sobibor and the same thing — hundreds and hundreds of thousands of Jews were murdered in those death camps, and you can’t see anything.

Beyond that, if I go back to places where shooting operations took place — not gassing operations — places like Babi Yar where we know there were 30,000 Jews were murdered there in the end of September, 1941 — all together close to 60.000 Jews in ’41 and ’42 were murdered in Babi Yar — and you go back there and you dig it up, you should find some physical evidence — bodies, bones, something — that doesn’t disappear — it’s not there because it was all dug up by a special, top secret operation commanded by SS Paul Blobel, called 1005 — personally created by Himmler in the Spring of 1942.

Think about that — the Germans at their height of military superiority in 1942, and they decide to go back and to clean up the mess they made. They went back to Babi Yar. They went back to the Rumbula Forest near Riga. They went back to the seventh and ninth fort near Kovna. They went back to Ponary near Vilna where tens of thousands of Jews had been murdered in ’41 and ’42. They dug it up — cleaned it out — disappeared.

As we have previously reported, at the alleged height of the killing operation in 1943 — the Jewish press published a cover story explaining why there would be no physical evidence of any mass murders of Jews at the end of the war.

In other words, the Jews had already to committed to the “Holocaust” narrative so as to justify the establishment of Israel — but because they made it all up — with the help of Academy Award-winning screenwriter, Ben Hecht — there wasn’t going to be any physical evidence to support such a far-fetched scenario.

Even leading Zionists like Rabbi Stephen Wise and Jewish Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter didn’t initially believe any of the Jewish-generated atrocity propaganda.

But they created a serious credibility problem — why would the uber-rational and efficient Germans at the height of their strength — believing that they would probably win the war and have nothing to hide — waste valuable man power and material support to hide the evidence of mass murder?

It makes no sense, and the Jews know it — but instead of admitting the obvious, they double down on this absurdity.

Both Auschwitz and Treblinka were built in swampy areas where the water table was very high — if you attempted to dig a mass grave, as Ephraim Kaye contends, it would immediately fill with water.

And if the Germans merely threw millions of tons of clothing into the Vistula River, that evidence could easily be dredged up today — but never has been because it isn’t there.

Just like they won’t dredge the Danube River for the alleged tens of thousands of shoes to confirm the mass murder of Jews in Hungary — because it never happened.

And there is no evidence of mass murder at Treblinka for a very simple reason — it was a transit camp, not a “death camp” with “gas chambers”.

According to these ridiculous Jewish “eye witnesses,” the Germans used a diesel-powered submarine engine from a Soviet submarine to gas the Jews at Treblinka — but they didn’t realize that diesel exhaust is not poisonous enough to kill people in “gas chambers” — or anywhere.

Watch the brilliant documentary “One-Third Of The Holocaust,” which completely dismantles and destroys any notion that Treblink, Belzec, and Sobibor were “death camps” with “gas chambers” — or that the Germans could have “cleaned up” the mess there.

There is no physical evidence of the Holocaust for a very simple, common sense reason — it didn’t happen.
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

User avatar
borjastick
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2816
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 5:52 am
Location: Europe

Re: 'Holocaust Museum' Explains How Complete Lack of Physical Evidence Is Proof of 'Holocaust'

Postby borjastick » 3 months 1 day ago (Wed Dec 02, 2020 4:21 am)

His own words would make him certifiably insane. He claims to have been to Auschwitz 17/18/19 times and see no evidence yet he chooses to believe the story. Why would any sane person do that? He describes Treblinka as a small death camp by the number of deaths which he claims were carried out there, yet once more he says when one goes to the place one sees no evidence at all. Rien, zero, de nada, nothing.

Then he talks of 30,000, no 60,000 killings at Babi Yar where according to him there is evidence a plenty. Yet in reality on planet earth it doesn't exist

At what point will this man realise he's been had, like every other jews on the planet. The holocaust as they want it to have happened, didn't.

The problem is for me the jews, every last single one of them born since 1945 have brainwashed themselves into believing this mythological event actually happened. Thus they have become purely and uniquely identified by the holocaust. Nothing else. They are not a religion anymore they are a belief system and a religion of mass murder. One could say their deity is Auschwitz itself.
'Of the four million Jews under Nazi control in WW2, six million died and alas only five million survived.'

'We don't need evidence, we have survivors' - israeli politician

User avatar
HMSendeavour
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 611
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2018 3:12 pm
Contact:

Re: 'Holocaust Museum' Explains How Complete Lack of Physical Evidence Is Proof of 'Holocaust'

Postby HMSendeavour » 3 months 1 day ago (Wed Dec 02, 2020 7:38 am)

borjastick wrote:The problem is for me the jews, every last single one of them born since 1945 have brainwashed themselves into believing this mythological event actually happened. Thus they have become purely and uniquely identified by the holocaust. Nothing else. They are not a religion anymore they are a belief system and a religion of mass murder. One could say their deity is Auschwitz itself.


You're pretty much on the money here.

The survey asked Jews whether each of nine attributes and activities is essential to what being Jewish means to them, is important but not essential, or is not an important part of what it means to be Jewish. In response, roughly seven-in-ten U.S. Jews (73%) say remembering the Holocaust is an essential part of what being Jewish means to them. [...] Remembering the Holocaust and leading an ethical and moral life are most frequently cited as essential by both Jews by religion and Jews of no religion. And both groups rank observing Jewish law and eating traditional Jewish foods near the bottom of what it means to be Jewish. [...] In both countries, majorities say remembering the Holocaust is essential to their Jewish identities (73% in U.S., 65% in Israel).

Sources: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/03/16/a-closer-look-at-jewish-identity-in-israel-and-the-u-s/ft_16-03-15_jewishidentity640px/, https://www.pewforum.org/2013/10/01/chapter-3-jewish-identity/#holocaust-jews


FT_16.03.15_JewishIdentity640px.png
jew-chp3-7.png
jew-chp3-8.png
Now what does it mean for the independent expert witness Van Pelt? In his eyes he had two possibilities. Either to confirm the Holocaust story, or to go insane. - Germar Rudolf, 13th IHR Conference.

User avatar
Lamprecht
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2355
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:32 pm

Re: 'Holocaust Museum' Explains How Complete Lack of Physical Evidence Is Proof of 'Holocaust'

Postby Lamprecht » 3 months 1 day ago (Wed Dec 02, 2020 9:31 am)

HMS brings up a Pew research poll, that is discussed here:

Most important part of being Jewish: Remembering the "Holocaust"
viewtopic.php?t=12425

As for physical remains, all of the guidelines on the archaeology of mass graves requires excavation. I have cited multiple sources here:

Mass grave excavation guidelines / The "Mass grave excavations don't produce photographed bodies" lie
viewtopic.php?t=12889

In another thread I wrote about an "Archeologist" that claims he has discovered huge mass graves at Treblinka, we get this gem:
The practice of Holocaust archaeology, uses desk-based archival research, satellite imagery, aerial photographs, remote sensing, topographic survey and geophysical techniques to identify destroyed camps, lost killing sites and hidden mass graves. Importantly, these techniques avoid excavation that would disturb human remains, a practice which is forbidden under Jewish Law. Staffordshire University’s Centre of Archaeology, of which I am a member, has worked at more than 40 sites across Europe.

Another Treblinka "Archaeologist"? William Mitchell claims to have "vital evidence to prove the deniers wrong"
viewtopic.php?t=13050

There you have it. There is "Archaeology" - the study of history by physically excavating sites and analyzing remains and artifacts ... and there is also "Holocaust archeology" which is a completely separate field of study. With "Holocaust archaeology" you use ground-penetrating radars and declare any soil disturbance to be a huge mass grave, no excavation required! With "Holocaust archeology" if you dig a hole and find a brick, you have just discovered the ruins of a homicidal gas chamber.

It is important that we invent completely new standards for studying science and history when it comes to the sacred H. The rules and regulations that have been used for decades and have worked perfectly fine for everything else must be thrown out the window for the holy H. :roll:

Also recommended:

"Jewish Burial Law" as excuse
viewtopic.php?t=8997

Cremated remains, bone ash, and water-solubility // the ash ponds
viewtopic.php?t=12278

[Video] Holocaust Stories vs Science - How Does Open Air Cremation Work // Treblinka Cremations debunked
viewtopic.php?t=12710
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance -- that principle is contempt prior to investigation."
— Herbert Spencer

User avatar
Lamprecht
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2355
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:32 pm

Re: 'Holocaust Museum' Explains How Complete Lack of Physical Evidence Is Proof of 'Holocaust'

Postby Lamprecht » 3 months 1 day ago (Wed Dec 02, 2020 9:42 am)

Hannover quotes Arad, a former Bolshevik partisan and IDF brigadier general, later to become the director of Yad Vashem:
The camp command was confronted with the problem of disposing of the large piles of ash and bits of bone that remained… Ultimately it was decided to dump the ash and bits of bone into the ditches that had previously held the bodies and to cover them with a thick layer of sand and dirt…"
-from Yitzhak Arad, BELZEC, SOBIBOR, TREBLINKA - (chapter 23) - The Erasure of the Crimes

There is more to it:
"The camp command was confronted with the problem of disposing of the large piles of ash and bits of bone that remained… Ultimately it was decided to dump the ash and bits of bone into the ditches that had previously held the bodies and to cover them with a thick layer of sand and dirt… [Treblinka Eyewitness] Abraham Goldfarb relates: …’we secretly placed in the walls of the graves whole skeletons and we wrote on scraps of paper what the Germans were doing at Treblinka. We put the scraps of paper into bottles, which we placed next to the skeletons. Our intention was that if one day someone looked for traces, they could indeed be found.’"

That, to me, sounds like they wanted to make sure that researchers in the future could go excavate and find the remains. Has anyone recovered one of these bottles? :roll:
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance -- that principle is contempt prior to investigation."
— Herbert Spencer

User avatar
HMSendeavour
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 611
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2018 3:12 pm
Contact:

Re: 'Holocaust Museum' Explains How Complete Lack of Physical Evidence Is Proof of 'Holocaust'

Postby HMSendeavour » 3 months 1 day ago (Wed Dec 02, 2020 10:35 am)

Lamprecht wrote:That, to me, sounds like they wanted to make sure that researchers in the future could go excavate and find the remains. Has anyone recovered one of these bottles? :roll:


This very simple, additional detail, is incredible. It just totally demolishes any possible argument that the Germans could've destroyed all the evidence. There's no excuse not to look for and find the evidence this Jew told everyone existed to help and prove the alleged atrocities. That this is totally ignored should speak volumes.

I haven't even heard this before. A very valuable addition to the Holocaust lore indeed.
Now what does it mean for the independent expert witness Van Pelt? In his eyes he had two possibilities. Either to confirm the Holocaust story, or to go insane. - Germar Rudolf, 13th IHR Conference.

User avatar
phdnm
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 3789
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2012 12:11 pm

Re: 'Holocaust Museum' Explains How Complete Lack of Physical Evidence Is Proof of 'Holocaust'

Postby phdnm » 2 months 4 weeks ago (Fri Dec 04, 2020 12:45 am)

Image

Image


An Expert on 'Eyewitness' Testimony Faces a Dilemma in the Demjanjuk Case

•WITNESS FOR THE DEFENSE by Elizabeth Loftus and Katherine Ketcham. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1991. Hardbound. 288 pages. Illustrations. ISBN: 0-312-05537-4.

Reviewed by John Cobden

Eyewitness testimony is the cornerstone of the Holocaust story. Much more than physical or documentary evidence, the accounts of "Holocaust survivors" have been crucial in convincing people that millions of European Jews were systematically exterminated in gas chambers during the Second World War.

What few realize is that such "eyewitness" testimony is notoriously inaccurate, biased and, in many cases, blatantly and demonstrably wrong. Jewish historian Samuel Gringauz, for example, once pointed out that:

... most of the memoirs and report [of "Holocaust survivors"] are full of preposterous verbosity, graphomanic exaggeration, dramatic effects, overestimated self-inflation, dilettante philosophizing, would-be lyricism, unchecked rumors, bias, partisan attacks and apologies.

The inaccuracy of Holocaust testimony is not unique, of course. Defective memory and false testimony occur in all aspects of life. It is to this fascinating subject that Dr. Elizabeth Loftus has dedicated her career. As she relates in Witness for the Defense, what began as a research project at Stanford University became her life-long calling


http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v11/v11p238_Cobden.html


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests