Was Adolf Hitler a Zionist Stooge?

[JLAD Prove Me Wrong]

This is an interview Adam Green did with Christopher Jon Bjerknes on the subject of whether or not Hitler was a Zionist. After Adam Green posted this on his Facebook page, the page was removed. Even if you disagree with Adam and Christopher, I would hope you would at least agree that people shouldn't be deleted from social media for different opinions and historical revisionism. Their conclusion is that Hitler was a Zionist, because he worked with Zionists, and that the founder of Zionism, Theodore Herzl, said that anti-Jewish countries will be Zionist allies. I'm not fully persuaded of their conclusion, but I can see where they are coming from. Thoughts?

[Spect3r]

I do not think Hitler was a Zionist.
But for sure he was more than ok with the idea of all the jews leaving for Israel.

[Kretschmer]

This question is similar to the absurd claim among Marxists that Hitler was a "Capitalist" for receiving support from large private enterprise in that friendly connection does not necessarily equal ideological agreement. Big business in Germany supported Hitler and the NSDAP because he would permit the continued existence of private property in stark contrast to the platform of the KPD, not because he was a "corporate shill."

One of the primary purposes of the economic Third Position and class collaboration in the first place in fact is to restrain the power of private enterprise from infringing upon the collective good of the State, the opposite of Capitalism's goal of concentrating all financial and human capital into the hands of the individual for the good of only that individual and not for the good of the collective.

Similarly, Hitler's cooperation with Zionist movements in Mandatory Palestine had nothing to do with Hitler being a "Zionist," and everything to do with a congruency in objectives between the NSDAP and the Zionists in Palestine; Hitler wanted to cast all Jewry out of Europe, and so did the Zionists, hence their agreements signed into effect throughout the 1930's out of one another's independent considerations for a mutual cooperation.

[borjastick]

Hitler wanted to cast all Jewry out of Europe, and so did the Zionists, hence their agreements signed into effect throughout the 1930's out of one another's independent considerations for a mutual cooperation.

-Kretchmer

In fact according to the excellent book The Founding Myths of Modern Israel by Roger Garoudy even the zionist loons who were discussing agreements with Hitler's top team were not after ALL jews to go to Palestine. They only wanted those who could add value via money or skill, to make the place work. These zionist leaders knew that to get the leverage and sympathy needed they would require jewish blood on the pavements of europe. In other words they were most happy that jews would be killed and hopefully in public which would be currency to the new zionist state in Palestine they so wanted.

[Hektor]

This question is similar to the absurd claim among Marxists that Hitler was a "Capitalist" for receiving support from large private enterprise in that friendly connection does not necessarily equal ideological agreement. Big business in Germany supported Hitler and the NSDAP because he would permit the continued existence of private property in stark contrast to the platform of the KPD, not because he was a "corporate shill."
......

That's how I would read it as well. Besides that investors want first and foremost one thing: stability and policy certainty. There is of course various routes to achieve that, but the NSDAP with Hitler must have appeared to them as the most viable option at the time.

Here is another one on the "Who funded Hitler?" question:


A lot of it is of course conjecture in which Corbett fills in his own interpretation. I doubt he has taken the effort to read speeches, policy documents, etc. in German. That's the problem with conspiracy theories they sometimes ignore that a lot of things happening are due to opportunism of role players, who of course have vested interests as well.

[Mr Adler]

No, Hitler certainly was not a "zionist stooge", a Rothschild or anything like that. Bjerknes is a either just an idiot or a despicable liar who relies on his victims not knowing any better. Doug Thomas on Renegade Tribune has ripped his arguments apart.

http://www.renegadetribune.com/the-lies ... -bjerknes/
http://www.renegadetribune.com/the-lies ... es-part-2/
http://www.renegadetribune.com/the-lies ... 7167968750
http://www.renegadetribune.com/the-lies ... nist-dupe/

[Turpitz]

Hitler will always be everything, except right and righteous! It can be no other way, especially for those in the west who fought against him. Watching the west disintegrate under communism and Organised Jewry is causing incredible mental gymnastics amongst those who fought alongside communism, and Jewry, during the war. Like an amplified Stockholm Syndrome. But they don't have the character in the west to concede they might just have got it wrong, no matter how obvious, or bad it gets. The way it's going at the moment it's going to get very bad, black as sin!

I have a video from years ago concerning this very subject, the heros will have probably seen it, but I will still put it here so as Hitler can have his say in the matter.