Introducing CODOH's New Marketing Manager, Jacob Tyler.

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
User avatar
Moderator
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1816
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2002 9:23 am

Re: Introducing CODOH's New Marketing Manager, Jacob Tyler.

Postby Moderator » 2 months 14 hours ago (Sat Jan 02, 2021 8:16 pm)

ServantOfAhuraMazda tells us:
They've been told by the mainstream that we are just a bunch of right wing conspiracy theorists and what do they find on this forum? Threads discussing white genocide, 9/11 and other present day politics.

Holocaust hoax is crumbling regardless of this forum, but that doesn't mean it shouldn't be utilized to its maximum

* Really? Those who benefit and profit from the fraud will always say whatever about Revisionists. That's a sign of the benefactors weaknesses and resultant desperation. And you let that bother you?

* 9/11 debate is not a "right wing conspiracy". That's simply another attempted distraction. There is now a mainstream view that the narrative pushed by government is unscientific nonsense and quite laughable; see:
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth: https://www.ae911truth.org/
Don't want to discuss it? Then don't.
The discussion here is in it's own forum and not limited to those who reject the government's conspiracy theory. All views are welcomed.

* The notion that there is a war on 'whites' is hardly a new, unusual one, http://www.unz.com and many other sites cover it quite well.
And so what? I remind you of the favorite term of attempted derision, "neo-Nazi", which is used against whites, and is based upon the contrived "holocaust" narrative.

* This forum has one recent thread / topic which raises the issue that the "Holocaust" fraud is part of the obvious war on whites.
And given that there have been 2340+ views of that thread as I speak, it sure looks to be of interest to many.

* I remind you that the "holocaust" is used in many such ways and we are open to addressing them all.
It's curious that you have a problem with that.

* You're dreaming or perhaps curiously wishing that CODOH and this forum have not led the way in exposing the absurdity of the "holocaust" claims. Even CODOH's detractors and the "Holocaust Industry" itself admit it.

We eagerly await your "H" Revisionist site, which will no doubt, necessarily reference CODOH over & over again.

Cheers, M1
Only lies need to be shielded from debate, truth welcomes it.

User avatar
Lamprecht
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2355
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:32 pm

Re: Introducing CODOH's New Marketing Manager, Jacob Tyler.

Postby Lamprecht » 2 months 10 hours ago (Sun Jan 03, 2021 12:33 am)

Some might not remember or may have not been around 2 years ago when the 9/11 subforum was made.

Should The CODOH Revisionist Forum have a separate 9/11 discussion - debate forum?
viewtopic.php?t=12178

There was a discussion about it and the user, Callahan, that was most adamant about it has had his account disabled for some reason. I don't see an issue with its existence as you can ignore the forum if you aren't interested in the subject. This is just a website where you can register and make posts with text, images and links. There was one guy that joined just to post numerology stuff in the 9/11 forum. He made a bunch of threads but it was just ridiculous and trying to find hidden meaning in dates and numbers so it got deleted.
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance -- that principle is contempt prior to investigation."
— Herbert Spencer

User avatar
Archie
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 235
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2020 12:44 am

Re: Introducing CODOH's New Marketing Manager, Jacob Tyler.

Postby Archie » 2 months 58 minutes ago (Sun Jan 03, 2021 10:13 am)

DissentingOpinions wrote:But isn't this a short term plan, at best? Germar & Mattogno are the only revisionists actively making content at a consistent level, and Mattogno is getting older. Even if CODOH & Castle Hill manages to reach more people like us in the near future, that still doesn't change the fact that revisionism will inevitably die out entirely in about 20 years or so.


New research could slow down for a number of reasons and it doesn't necessarily indicate a lack of interest in revisionism. It might just be that much of the low hanging fruit has been picked at this point. Regardless, I think there's still a lot to be done to popularize the work that's already been done.

Between the early revisionist material, plus all the JHR archives, plus Holocaust Handbooks, plus Inconvenient History, etc, that's a lot of material that's already out there, very little of which has been adequately addressed by the believers. If anything, I can imagine that at some point in the future after the Holocaust myth has crumbled that people will marvel at how much ink was spilt on something so transparently bogus.

Although I personally like the historical aspects of revisionism, the battle ahead is primarily one of politics and marketing.

User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 10305
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Re: Introducing CODOH's New Marketing Manager, Jacob Tyler.

Postby Hannover » 1 month 4 weeks ago (Sun Jan 03, 2021 1:00 pm)

Archie wrote:Although I personally like the historical aspects of revisionism, the battle ahead is primarily one of politics and marketing.

Exactly, Archie. And I might add that the next battle involving politics and marketing will be legal.

Since Revisionist research has easily demolished the impossible narrative, the only recourse, other than an admission of fraudulence which The Usual Enemies of Free Speech are not about to partake in, is to silence free speech about it all together.

While censorship has already occurred at many levels, there is no doubt that an immense push to legally ban free speech in the US on the 'holocaust' is coming.

- Hannover

Only lies require censorship.
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

jtyler777
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2021 3:11 pm

Re: Introducing CODOH's New Marketing Manager, Jacob Tyler.

Postby jtyler777 » 1 month 4 weeks ago (Tue Jan 05, 2021 3:51 pm)

Thank you all for the warm welcome! I am thrilled and honored to be here. :D

It troubles me that I'm apparently off on the wrong foot with a few of you already. I apologize if there was anything in my introduction that offends anyone's sensibilities. I fully expect that many of you here do not share in my faith, but I'm reasonably certain that many do. Given that revisionism and ideological and academic insurgency draw free-thinking people of every stripe, I would like to think that knowing where the folks that we fellowship with in here stand can only open up newer and greater avenues for dialogue and mutual edification and enrichment.

I would respectfully point out to anyone who my introduction was vexatious to a few things though:

-Historically, it has been men of faith who paved the way for most if not all of the great advances in science and culture, so it's a bit obtuse and divisive to assert that religion is somehow the real enemy of our people and is incompatible with the scientific method. Or is something that cannot coexist with genuine scholasticism.
-One can choose to reject organized religion for whatever their reasons are, while still being intellectually honest enough to recognize the rather remarkable and timeless correlation AND causation between faith in a higher power and creator, discovery, and defense and preservation of that which has been discovered. One has to perform the mental gymnastics of an undefeated Olympic gold medalist to rationalize how Christianity is anything other than a central component of the development of the civilized world. One can choose not to be a Christian for any number of reasons. But attacking the entire structure is to attack vast portions of our own history. Which is a pretty schizophrenic tendency to nurture for anyone, but especially folks who pride themselves on their ability to understand real history and apply it to the present.
-I agree with the sentiment expressed that people professing a form of religion and governments and organizations who have weaponized the same have done as much damage as any throughout history. But to assert this while ignoring the inordinately greater amount of good that is done in the world, both by and for western civilization by the Christian faith is absurd in the highest degree.
-It is one thing to spurn faith in the God of the Bible on a personal level. But to sneer at the accomplishments of our countless ancestors who embraced that faith as the driving force behind all that they did for our people and civilizations throughout the millennia is the actual slight to them—however unintended said slight may be.

There is a great deal more I could say about his, but I would discuss matters such as this in a civil and productive manner, or not at all. I am not here to debate y'all. I'm here to serve you. If we can have some lively discourse and challenge each other's presuppositions and help each other learn new things along the way, I'm all for it. But I'm not here to clash with fellow laborers in the trenches, and I assumed going into this job that a great many here do not share my faith. I merely open up about it to all of you because I want all of you to know me a little, and in order to do so, you need to know that faith is (as it has been for so many of our people throughout the ages), a big part of my life and the central tenet of my worldview. I do not expect anyone here to feel obligated to affirm me on this. It's just who I am, and regardless of what we agree or disagree on, I welcome the opportunity to get to know any of you who would like to chat some time better.

Finally, let me issue the caveat here that my personal views are in no way a reflection of CODOH as an organization and the worldview of its key players any more than the same could be reasonably asserted of anyone working for any educational organization. I was hired because Germar and I have a good rapport and he has faith in me and feels confident that what I bring to the table will help CODOH. So if anyone here actually thinks that the late great Mr. Bradley Smith's legacy is being besmirched by my arrival on the scene, you need not worry. The sum is greater than its parts.

I look forward to getting to know all of you as time permits, and to being of service to you as well as we labor together in the trenches for the cause of truth and liberty.

Veritas vincit omnia.

jtyler777
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2021 3:11 pm

Re: Introducing CODOH's New Marketing Manager, Jacob Tyler.

Postby jtyler777 » 1 month 4 weeks ago (Tue Jan 05, 2021 4:50 pm)

I'm seeing a lot of great observations being stated, and good questions being raised about the state of social media and the dissident intellectual community in general, so to give you an idea of what the agenda is, allow me to elaborate a bit.

While mainstream social media venues should be occupied by us for as long as is humanly possible, they are the epitome of a hostile environment for us. Unless Trump's administration really does something to crack down on big tech, it is only a matter of time before anyone and everyone to the right of Karl Marx is purged from mainstream social media by the left. Project Veritas has released at least two exposes now featuring Facebook employees with hidden camera footage of fellow employees bragging about how they refuse to enforce community guidelines when leftists are involved, but make it their mission to flag or even ban anyone they find who is even wearing a MAGA hat.
Consequently, Facebook has become a dystopian digital hellscape where leftists can post rambling, ranting diatribes about how every white person needs to be literally crucified in the streets—even the elderly, women and children—but THE Declaration of Independence and memes with John 3:16 in them get flagged for "violating community guidelines." There's no hyperbole there, by the way. Both of those are real examples.
Between that and Twitter engaging in brazen election interference, even normies are beginning to realize how corrupt and evil mainstream social media giants are now, and a lot of folks are flocking to alternative venues. Venues such as Parler, which I noticed someone was astute enough to mention in their comment, which is the latest alternative to Twitter and surged in membership by the hundreds of thousands when Twitter started censoring Trump's tweets, the press secretary and even the nation's oldest newspaper leading up to and on election day.

The MSM has completely abandoned any real pretense at objectivity as well, and is even being fact-checked by gaming channels on Youtube now. More and more, we are seeing people who aren't even right wing, but moderates at best openly acknowledging how the MSM—even cohen-servative outlets like Fox News—is little more than a social clique for partisan hacks, pathological liars and idiosyncratic ideologues.

Our "friends" over at the SPLC and ADL have been getting some criticism for awhile now, but at this rate, it's only a matter of time before this loss of faith in the mainstream information network bleeds into this realm as well, and watchdog, gatekeeper and educational institutions start imploding and collapsing under the weight of all their lies as well. We are seeing the beginning signs of this already, for it's not an uncommon talking point amongst the growing numbers of people who are disillusioned with the prevailing (yet apparently faltering) zeitgeist that mainstream academia is going right along with the insane narratives that folks are starting to push back against.

What's my point in all of this?

That we are witnessing a chain reaction. And that mainstream academia is overdue for its turn in this explosive turn of events. CODOH and organizations like it have a real opportunity to be a guiding light amidst the inevitable to ensue chaos and upheaval, and the draconian and dictatorial tactics of the left have exponentially increased the market for alternatives for people to turn to.

For this reason, while continuing to fight the infowar all that we can in the mainstream venues, our real play is to begin cultivating a serious presence for CODOH in places like Parler, Gab, VK, MeWe, Minds, and everywhere else we can. Yes, we thoroughly anticipate to be censored in even some of the alternative venues, but we don't want it any other way. The great danger in times of upheaval is for people to become complacent once they've found an alternative long before properly vetting that alternative to be sure that it's not just another opportunistic proprietor of a halfway house.
For some people, the ultimate proof that revisionists are over the target will be when they see people who are supposed to be on our side engaging in some of the same tactics and behaviors as the enemy. Some of the biggest holdouts against hardcore truth aren't from the left. They're from right wingers at the front of mutual admiration societies that both think they are, and are perceived to be cutting edge. The illusions that the celebrity right wingers who are very compromised in reality have some kind of corner on rational discourse and on what issues need to be discussed must be shattered before more widespread acceptance of Holocaust revisionism can come to pass. As this begins to happen, audiences will begin to outpace the luminaries they listen to, and when that happens, even if only grudgingly, those with larger outreach will have to start giving us the time of day.

It's an uphill slog to be sure, but every war is. And we're fighting a war of ideas.

User avatar
HMSendeavour
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 611
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2018 3:12 pm
Contact:

Re: Introducing CODOH's New Marketing Manager, Jacob Tyler.

Postby HMSendeavour » 1 month 3 weeks ago (Wed Jan 06, 2021 10:53 am)

jtyler777 wrote:So if anyone here actually thinks that the late great Mr. Bradley Smith's legacy is being besmirched by my arrival on the scene, you need not worry. The sum is greater than its parts.


Hello.

Sorry to be blunt, but if anyone is besmirching the legacy of CODOH it is Germar Rudolf. His recent comments about how the Germans during WWII committed Genocide is utterly repugnant and off the mark, I have lost respect for Germar because of this and so would any revisionist who understands the nature of the claims Jews have levelled at the German people and the German leadership during WWII who were doing their best in the interests of their people. You can see this thread on the topic: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=13667. I have already put my thoughts down there, nothing more needs to be said on this.

jtyler777 wrote:Thank you all for the warm welcome! I am thrilled and honored to be here. :D

It troubles me that I'm apparently off on the wrong foot with a few of you already. I apologize if there was anything in my introduction that offends anyone's sensibilities. I fully expect that many of you here do not share in my faith, but I'm reasonably certain that many do. Given that revisionism and ideological and academic insurgency draw free-thinking people of every stripe, I would like to think that knowing where the folks that we fellowship with in here stand can only open up newer and greater avenues for dialogue and mutual edification and enrichment.

I would respectfully point out to anyone who my introduction was vexatious to a few things though:

-Historically, it has been men of faith who paved the way for most if not all of the great advances in science and culture, so it's a bit obtuse and divisive to assert that religion is somehow the real enemy of our people and is incompatible with the scientific method. Or is something that cannot coexist with genuine scholasticism.
-One can choose to reject organized religion for whatever their reasons are, while still being intellectually honest enough to recognize the rather remarkable and timeless correlation AND causation between faith in a higher power and creator, discovery, and defense and preservation of that which has been discovered. One has to perform the mental gymnastics of an undefeated Olympic gold medalist to rationalize how Christianity is anything other than a central component of the development of the civilized world. One can choose not to be a Christian for any number of reasons. But attacking the entire structure is to attack vast portions of our own history. Which is a pretty schizophrenic tendency to nurture for anyone, but especially folks who pride themselves on their ability to understand real history and apply it to the present.


I don't really care that you're Christian, if you do a good job, then you do a good job. If you don't, then that's unfortunate but must be accepted all the same.

However, I don't at all think Christianity is a central component to development in the civilised world. Christianity as a faith has utterly failed to instil in Europeans a sense of racial pride and mission, if anything it has done the opposite. I myself have been fairly non-religious all my life, at one time I was a staunch Atheist before I realised that religion (generally) is not just the unfettered delusions of historical swindlers, but largely genetic, and has certainly been successful as far as group survival strategies go. I will concede that religion is also a general force for good to historically motivate certain accomplishments, some religions more than others. Islam for example has been utterly impotent in this regard and hasn't really changed whatsoever. Christianity has faired much better, but that's because it was put into the hands of Europeans. However the logical conclusion of a liberalised Christianity is what has brought the Western World to the brink of collapse. To deny this, would be to deny the current day political predicament we're in. You must be able to recognise the good, and the bad.

The real 'central component' is spiritualism in the service of ones people. It is fiercely opposing a nihilistic, materialistic Marxist conception of the world. Substituting it for the duty towards ones own people is the most important thing a civilisation founded on a common thread of crimson kinship can do.

I'm rather ambivalent towards Christianity, and have personally seen many who are Pagan (I do not consider myself Pagan) that do a better job perusing truth than a Christian who is stuck in his dogmas about "humanity" and "mankind" and "love" or what have you. For example, Jonathan Bowden was a much more intelligent and wise politically 'switched on' person, than E. Michael Jones is, who spends is time talking about Jews and denying the reality of race, and the importance of race, in favour of a blind spiritualism that ignores the temporal issues our civilization faces. If I were a Christian, I would say that denying the existence of races, and the importance of racial differences is to spurn God's creation. Yet I would still say this now, but substitute God for "evolution" which has nonetheless produced a diversity among mankind that ought not to be destroyed. You see, we can differ in our belief, but still align.

I will still stress that I'm not an Atheist, such people I believe to also be a great danger to civilisation, for they are often the nihilistic Marxists who feel that they're not obliged to follow any kind of social convention if it impedes on their licentious, hedonistic lifestyles. I am a believer in ones people, very much in the spirit of the Third Reich.

I would suggest, if you're interested in a light read, the book...
'God and Folk: Soldierly Affirmation'
(Gott und Volk: Soldatisches Bekenntnis)
njyp9d-front-shortedge-384.jpg
English: https://archive.org/details/god-and-folk-soldierly-affirmation
German Original: https://archive.org/details/GottUndVolk-SoldatischesBekenntnis

This book characterises my criticism of Christianity and my view of the necessary nature of spiritualism quite well. That one must be devoted to their people biologically, and metaphysically.

I don't think it's particularly wise to insinuate that people who have historical criticisms of Christianity are 'schizophrenic'. You'll not be doing yourself any favours.

I would say that it is a mark against 'real history' to be unwilling to evaluate negative aspects of the past, and recognise when ones people has walked too far from the trail they need to be on. History can never change, nor should we spurn the past necessarily, let alone feel guilty for it, but we should move forward having learned from it, and with the intention of doing better than before.

You have claimed that accomplishments of our ancestors has been scorned on the basis of those having accomplished them being Christian. I haven't seen anyone do this, nor do I think people here have a vendetta against 'accomplishments'. But they certainly have a criticism of the results certain paths of history have taken us down. For example, the Industrial Revolution was a wonderful accomplishment, but is having some very unfortunate results, especially in the hands of those who peruse what they call 'progress' for its own sake. I think Ted Kaczynski is a great critic in this regard, but personally, his own idealised future where everyone runs around in the nude foraging in the woods isn't the right path either.

If one is going to criticize history, or religion, it should be tempered and nuanced. It should be done while keeping in mind where we would like to go in the future, and what we would like to avoid.
Now what does it mean for the independent expert witness Van Pelt? In his eyes he had two possibilities. Either to confirm the Holocaust story, or to go insane. - Germar Rudolf, 13th IHR Conference.

User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 10305
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Re: Introducing CODOH's New Marketing Manager, Jacob Tyler.

Postby Hannover » 1 month 3 weeks ago (Wed Jan 06, 2021 12:13 pm)

HMSendeavour said:
Sorry to be blunt, but if anyone is besmirching the legacy of CODOH it is Germar Rudolf. His recent comments about how the Germans during WWII committed Genocide is utterly repugnant and off the mark
Really?

Where?

- Hannover
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

User avatar
Lamprecht
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2355
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:32 pm

Re: Introducing CODOH's New Marketing Manager, Jacob Tyler.

Postby Lamprecht » 1 month 3 weeks ago (Wed Jan 06, 2021 12:16 pm)

Hannover wrote:HMSendeavour said:
Sorry to be blunt, but if anyone is besmirching the legacy of CODOH it is Germar Rudolf. His recent comments about how the Germans during WWII committed Genocide is utterly repugnant and off the mark
Really?

Where?

- Hannover
See:

The Realist Report – John Friend with Germar Rudolf – Nov 5, 2020 — TRANSCRIPT
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=13667
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance -- that principle is contempt prior to investigation."
— Herbert Spencer

User avatar
HMSendeavour
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 611
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2018 3:12 pm
Contact:

Re: Introducing CODOH's New Marketing Manager, Jacob Tyler.

Postby HMSendeavour » 1 month 3 weeks ago (Wed Jan 06, 2021 12:26 pm)

Hannover wrote:Really?

Where?

- Hannover


I linked to the thread regarding it in the post:

HMSendeavour wrote:You can see this thread on the topic: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=13667. I have already put my thoughts down there, nothing more needs to be said on this.
Now what does it mean for the independent expert witness Van Pelt? In his eyes he had two possibilities. Either to confirm the Holocaust story, or to go insane. - Germar Rudolf, 13th IHR Conference.

User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 10305
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Re: Introducing CODOH's New Marketing Manager, Jacob Tyler.

Postby Hannover » 1 month 3 weeks ago (Wed Jan 06, 2021 12:59 pm)

HMS, that is a real yawner, a matter of tortured semantics and there is plenty to say on this.

'100,000 died at Auschwitz' is not the "genocide" as alleged by The Industry. I know it, you know it, Rudolf knows it.

I disagree with Rudolf's use of the term, but if anyone wants to claim that 100,000 mostly disease deaths is the so called 'holocaust', then I say welcome to Revisionism.

- Hannover
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

User avatar
HMSendeavour
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 611
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2018 3:12 pm
Contact:

Re: Introducing CODOH's New Marketing Manager, Jacob Tyler.

Postby HMSendeavour » 1 month 3 weeks ago (Wed Jan 06, 2021 1:19 pm)

Hannover wrote:HMS, that is a real yawner, a matter of tortured semantics and there is plenty to say on this.

'100,000 died at Auschwitz' is not the "genocide" as alleged by The Industry. I know it, you know it, Rudolf knows it.


You're right, I do know it, because I never questioned it.

I disagree that it's semantics, it is a serious charge to claim someone committed genocide, and there is a host of implications that go along with such an accusation, none of which can be applied to the German leadership in WW2.

Hannover wrote:I disagree with Rudolf's use of the term, but if anyone wants to claim that 100,000 mostly disease deaths is the so called 'holocaust', then I say welcome to Revisionism.

- Hannover


I don't disagree necessarily, it wouldn't be unwelcome if the conventional narrative were to accept such a figure. But in the end, the figures are simply one part of the narrative. The Holocaust as you know is a cultural weapon, not just a matter of figures. The associated guilt that goes along with any number of deaths, and an unchallenged charge of "genocide" makes the numbers, no matter how small, seem rather irrelevant in comparison. Now, I am not saying they are irrelevant. I am saying that the cultural weapon of the Holocaust isn't reduced in its potency even if you were to simply get the exterminationists to acquiesce on a lower figure.
Now what does it mean for the independent expert witness Van Pelt? In his eyes he had two possibilities. Either to confirm the Holocaust story, or to go insane. - Germar Rudolf, 13th IHR Conference.

User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 10305
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Re: Introducing CODOH's New Marketing Manager, Jacob Tyler.

Postby Hannover » 1 month 3 weeks ago (Wed Jan 06, 2021 2:01 pm)

HMSendeavour wrote:I disagree that it's semantics, it is a serious charge to claim someone committed genocide, and there is a host of implications that go along with such an accusation, none of which can be applied to the German leadership in WW2.

It's a "serious charge" only if one ignores the fact that there were no gas chambers involved, if one ignores the Allies responsibility in the deaths, if one ignores that claim of the original 4,000,000, and now 1,500,000.

In comparison it reveals the absolute fraudulence of the 'holocaust' narrative.


And of course, one can easily throw the deaths of Germans, Italians, Romanians, all Axis troops & peoples in the hands of the Allies right back at anyone who claims that this alleged "100,000" is 'genocidal' and 'holocaust-like' in nature.

HMSendeavour wrote:I don't disagree necessarily, it wouldn't be unwelcome if the conventional narrative were to accept such a figure. But in the end, the figures are simply one part of the narrative. The Holocaust as you know is a cultural weapon, not just a matter of figures. The associated guilt that goes along with any number of deaths, and an unchallenged charge of "genocide" makes the numbers, no matter how small, seem rather irrelevant in comparison. Now, I am not saying they are irrelevant. I am saying that the cultural weapon of the Holocaust isn't reduced in its potency even if you were to simply get the exterminationists to acquiesce on a lower figure.

Agreed, it is a cultural weapon, that is a primary reason that is was contrived,
Recall the Jew efforts at pushing their fake '6,000,000' going back to the early 19th century.

To believe "100,000" mostly disease deaths does not reduce the potency the 'holocaust' is refuted by the fact that such a number and the cause of death is fought tooth & nail by the lying "Holocaust Industry".

We probably need to discuss this at the thread mentioned above: viewtopic.php?f=2&t=13667

Regards, Hannover
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 10305
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Re: Introducing CODOH's New Marketing Manager, Jacob Tyler.

Postby Hannover » 1 month 3 weeks ago (Wed Jan 06, 2021 4:30 pm)

Email response from Germar Rudolf:
There is not a single major nation involved in WWII that did not commit genocide."

- Hannover
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

User avatar
Sannhet
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 835
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 6:12 pm
Location: USA

Re: Introducing CODOH's New Marketing Manager, Jacob Tyler.

Postby Sannhet » 1 month 3 weeks ago (Tue Jan 12, 2021 6:21 am)

HMSendeavour wrote:Talking about 9/11 is too many steps removed from the Holocaust to justify it's discussion here in my opinion

Agree.


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests