from Germar Rudolfs book , The Rudolf Report
RE:Leuchters Findings and what he reported at the trial
"All samples taken from the gas chambers supposedly used for mass human extermination exhibited either no or only negligible traces of cyanide, while the sample from the delousing chambers taken for use as control purposes exhibited enormously high cyanide concentrations."
since there WERE traces of cyanide found in some of the destroyed "genocidal gas chambers" does this not hurt the Revisonist position.?
If I were a judge, I would HAVE TO decide that the Leuchter report has reported their is some evidence of cyanide contamination. I would have to find Zundel's claims without justification.
what do you think?
===================================
If you were a judge, you would have to request other things along the way. Like forensic proof of any of the alleged mass grave / cremation sites. I would assume you may be talking about some judge in an American court or such as opposed to a Nuremberg judge? I mean, as the record shows, Nuremberg judges weren't concerned with such things.
One of the problems for any of the reports on cyanide traces including the Leuchter Report or the Krakow Report is no one tested for any background levels. Cyanide is to this day emitted into the atmosphere by numerous industrial processes and there was a lot more in those days. Coke producing plants would emit enormous amounts. First it would have to be established that any of the teeny weeny little traces found in any of the alleged chambers were not just background levels to see if it was unique to that installation. Then it would have to be shown any levels were the residuals of mass extermination. Then it would have to be shown why the levels wouldn't be higher as found in the fumigation chambers. Then the judge would have to hear why there are no traces of Prussian Blue.
Then, of course, if you tried to sell the (non-Nuremberg) judge on the idea of the traces coming from mass exterminations you would have to show how the stuff was introduced. If you say 'holes' in the roofs a real judge or defense attorney would require you to show that was the case.
The forensic information we have now shows there were only slight, teeny weeny little amounts found in association with the alleged gas chambers and lots of it at the fumigation facilities. So much so at the latter that you can actually see it on the walls as Prussian Blue.
Are you talking about a U.S. judge, in a U.S. court, under the court standards known for murder trials or are you talking about Nuremberg judges?
