Google - Air Photo moved from page 1 to 4

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
theTRUTH
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 195
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 9:50 pm

Google - Air Photo moved from page 1 to 4

Postby theTRUTH » 1 decade 6 years ago (Sun Jan 30, 2005 1:50 am)

With the Auschwitz publicity, Air Photo Evidence should be getting 3,000 hits a day, instead of 300. Wed, Feb 2nd, the BBC docu-drama will discuss the Auschwitz bombing topic, so I looked on Google for links.

Air Photo Evidence one year ago (Jan, 2004) had the following links:

Auschwitz+bombing: page 1 = 4 links, pg 2 = 3 links, pg 3 = 5 links
Auschwitz+bomb: (the same amount of links)

Now (Jan 2005) Google had the following links:

Auschwitz+bombing:
ihr = pg 1, no 8
fpp (Irving) = pg 3, no 39, and pg 5, no 50
Air Photo Evidence = pg 4, no 47,and pg 6, no 60
vho = pg 7, no 73

Auschwitz+bomb:
ihr = pg 1, no 5
fpp = pg 4, no 49
Air Photo Evidence = pg 5, no 56, and pg 8, no 81

Yahoo had the following links:

Auschwitz+bombing:
ihr = pg 1, no 1, and pg 9l, no 99
Air Photo Evidence = pg 1, no 6, and pg 4, no 44

Auschwitz+bomb:
ihr = pg 2, no 4, and pg 3, no 34
Air Photo Evidence = pg 5, no 54, and pg 8, no 88

Most searchers don't get past page 2 on Google or Yahoo. Is this just the large amount of links between the Holocaust Lobby sites, and what can Revisionists do to move their sites onto Google's or Yahoo's page one or two?

Carto's Cutlass Supreme
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2463
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 1:42 am
Location: Northern California

Postby Carto's Cutlass Supreme » 1 decade 6 years ago (Sun Jan 30, 2005 3:02 am)

I don't know how you came up with #47, as if the site is completely buried, I just tried what you did, and didn't get that at all.

auschwitz+bombing returns air-photo.com on the first page twice.

IHR returned number 7. So on page 1 there are 3 hits for revisionists, which is a very impressive count.

Perhaps you tried this some weeks ago, and what was being reflected was that your site was down when the google robot came to crawl the page.

air-photo uses frames, and frames are a big no no in the search engine world. The google robot can't follow them. They make the page look nice but return terribly in search engine results. Frames were created by the browser companies, but weren't something recommended by the W3 committee I believe, for that very reason.

The reason air-photo.com returns so well, is that page 1 doesn't have any frames.--Actually I just looked and it seems that the frame pages are being recorded by google too. So maybe it's fine.

User avatar
Haldan
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 1371
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 9:56 pm
Location: <secret>
Contact:

Postby Haldan » 1 decade 6 years ago (Sun Jan 30, 2005 9:28 am)

auschwitz+bombing is on the second page when I try it.

-haldan
<?php if ($Holocaust == false ) {deny_repeatedly(); } else { investigate(); } ?>
Homage to Catalin Haldan

theTRUTH
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 195
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 9:50 pm

Postby theTRUTH » 1 decade 6 years ago (Sun Jan 30, 2005 10:23 am)

On Google I used "Bombing+Auschwitz" to show number 47, and you used "Auschwitz+bombing" to show number 10. Millions are going to be introduced for the first time to the Auschwitz bombing controversy on Feb 2nd (Wed); we'll see how many link to Air Photo.

User avatar
TruthSeeker
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 165
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 3:45 pm
Location: Lebanon

Postby TruthSeeker » 1 decade 6 years ago (Sun Jan 30, 2005 11:51 am)

9th and 10th on page 1 for me. 26th (page 3) for FPP.

Richard Perle
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 647
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 9:45 am

Postby Richard Perle » 1 decade 6 years ago (Sun Jan 30, 2005 11:58 am)

It appears on the second page for me. I think the name 'air-photo' will attract people because it sounds like it might be an authoritative site. I just wish the site was better presented.


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests